INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith

[SuzieC]

I still luvs Judge Tanya, even if Susie does not any more.

WTF? Me bad for inartfully stating my LOVE for Judge Chutkan. I read the opinion with glee and gratitude that we have Obama, Clinton, and Biden judges on the bench.

[Kriselda Gray]

I could not possibly love Judge Tonya Chutkan any more.

Hmm, there's an ambiguous bit of grammar! I'll go with the approval interpretation

reminds me of a facebook group I've seen around "The last thing I want to do is hurt you ...but it's on the list"

[Ben-Prime]

Off Topic

I could not possibly love Judge Tonya Chutkan any more.

Hmm, there's an ambiguous bit of grammar! I'll go with the approval interpretation

reminds me of a facebook group I've seen around "The last thing I want to do is hurt you ...but it's on the list"

A friend of mine who went through a very bad divorce once put up a sign that said "I still miss my ex-wife, but my aim is improving."

He's since read the room of his circle of friends -- none of whom actually liked her, though we tried, but none of which actually want even the mental image of him harming her -- and taken it down.

[much ado]

Off Topic

A friend of mine who went through a very bad divorce once put up a sign that said "I still miss my ex-wife, but my aim is improving."

He's since read the room of his circle of friends -- none of whom actually liked her, though we tried, but none of which actually want even the mental image of him harming her -- and taken it down.

I've been rewatching all of the James Bond movies. That joke is explicit in "The World Is Not Enough" (1999) where Bond (Pierce Brosnan) shoots bad girl Elektra King (Sophie Marceau), who he originally thought was a very good girl. In this short scene Bond frees "M" (Judi Dench), his boss, and confronts Elektra, with unfortunate consequences. "I never miss."

[June bug]

I still luvs Judge Tanya, even if Susie does not any more.

WTF? Me bad for inartfully stating my LOVE for Judge Chutkan. I read the opinion with glee and gratitude that we have Obama, Clinton, and Biden judges on the bench.

You said it perfectly, SusieC. Per Grammarly:

“Just remember: If you’re talking about a quantity of something, use ANY MORE. If you’re talking about time, use ANYMORE.”

[Sam the Centipede]

You said it perfectly, SusieC. Per Grammarly:

“Just remember: If you’re talking about a quantity of something, use ANY MORE. If you’re talking about time, use ANYMORE.”

to Grammarly: there is no difference between the two in speech. In spelling yes, in pronunciation, no. The lexical space is not phonetically realized in connected speech. Or am I being unfair in expecting accuracy from pedants?

[Gene Kooper]

I could not possibly love Judge Tonya Chutkan any more.

I still luvs Judge Tanya, even if Susie does not any more.

WTF? Me bad for inartfully stating my LOVE for Judge Chutkan. I read the opinion with glee and gratitude that we have Obama, Clinton, and Biden judges on the bench.

I know I'm just a silly geologist, but neonzx's comment isn't about grammar. It's about SuzieC's misspelling of Tanya, which was probably an autocorrect issue.

[northland10]

reminds me of a facebook group I've seen around "The last thing I want to do is hurt you ...but it's on the list"

[June bug]

You said it perfectly, SusieC. Per Grammarly:

“Just remember: If you’re talking about a quantity of something, use ANY MORE. If you’re talking about time, use ANYMORE.”

to Grammarly: there is no difference between the two in speech. In spelling yes, in pronunciation, no. The lexical space is not phonetically realized in connected speech. Or am I being unfair in expecting accuracy from pedants?

But SusieC was writing, not speaking.

[bill_g]

Tell that to the voices in my head that read the writing out loud.

[Foggy]

Chutkan good, orange man bad.

[Uninformed]

Judge Chutkan rules tfg does not have absolute immunity:

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sh ... cr0257-171

[raison de arizona]

Busy morning.
https://twitter.com/highbrow_nobrow/sta ... 07231?s=20

On the morning of January 6, 2021, former President Donald Trump spoke with:

1. Stephen Bannon
2. Rudy Giuliani
3. Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH)
4. Senator Joshua Hawley (R-MO)

► Show Spoiler

[raison de arizona]

THREAD:

In 9-page court filing, Special Counsel Jack Smith details some of the evidence he'll introduce at Trump's election conspiracy criminal trial here in Washington

Including the allegation a Trump campaign employee encouraged "rioting" in Detroit, in Nov. 2020

More ====>

New Jack Smith court filing: "To ensure the destabilizing impact of his widespread election fraud claims in the run-up to the 2020 election.. defendant repeatedly refused to commit to a peaceful transition of presidential power if he lost the election. The Govt will offer proof"

[Dr. Ken]

Here's the filing
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .176.0.pdf

[Maybenaut]

The filing is notice required by Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) of other crimes, wrongs, or acts. Sometimes referred to as “uncharged misconduct,” this sort of evidence is usually offered by the prosecution, not to show that the defendant is a bad guy (which isn’t ordinarily allowed **), but to show that the defendant knew what he was doing when he did what he did. It helps, supposedly, to paint a more complete picture.

** Don’t get me started on Federal/Military Rules of Evidence 413 and 414, which only apply in sex assault cases, and do allow the prosecution to present evidence of similar crimes - even baseless rumors - as character evidence to show that the defendant had the propensity to engage in acts of sexual assault. I really think those particular rules promote convictions based on the likelihood of fire among all this smoke, jury instructions on reasonable doubt notwithstanding. But that’s just me. No military appellate court ever agreed with me.

[raison de arizona]

Trump has moved to stop any further proceedings in his DC prosecution while he appeals Judge Chutkan's rulings against him. My favorite bit is where his lawyers say they'll assume everything is stayed unless they hear back to the contrary. Oh to be the judge who gets to respond!

[raison de arizona]

https://x.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/173 ... 27454?s=20

No surprise. But noteworthy.

Trump is appealing Judge Tanya Chutkan’s denial of his claim of “Presidential immunity” in his election conspiracy criminal case in DC.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

[raison de arizona]

Gee, wouldn't it be nice if we could just make this all go away until after the election?
PRESIDENT TRUMP'S OPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL

[Greatgrey]

She wants briefs.

[keith]

Chutkan left off the part that it is further ORDERED that Judge Chutkan will issue the deny the motion at 08:30 on Wednesday...

[Reality Check]

Trump has moved to stop any further proceedings in his DC prosecution while he appeals Judge Chutkan's rulings against him. My favorite bit is where his lawyers say they'll assume everything is stayed unless they hear back to the contrary. Oh to be the judge who gets to respond!

IANAL but Trump's motion cites Coinbase, Inc. v Bielski. That was an arbitration case and concerned section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act. It had nothing to do with appeals in criminal cases.

[Greatgrey]

What has the Trump circus been missing?

SovCit, SovCit, SovCit… we got ‘em now! (pg 187)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 80.0_2.pdf

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

Oh, it's included because it's part of the docket.

[realist]

Oh, it's included because it's part of the docket.

And permission to file was denied.