![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
OHhhh... FFS.johnpcapitalist wrote: ↑Fri Apr 21, 2023 10:52 amRegarding the "A=432" business, there has been a movement for a while to change the common tuning standard for musical instruments from the current A=440 hertz to this slightly different number. Some music theorists believe things sound better that way. I am not musical and I can't hear the difference between the two tones. IIRC, A=432 is a function of some other note (maybe C in the octave below) being 256 hertz, an exact power of two.orlylicious wrote: ↑Fri Apr 21, 2023 1:32 am Think Foggy would buy this documentary for us all to watch?
Released today: Flight of the Brunson Brothers!
What the heck does this mean??? "ALL GOOD LION FILMS & VOICE NARRATION ARE TUNED TO 432 HZ THIS MAKES DIFFICULT INFORMATION EASIER TO DIGEST"
This fight is not about reinstating Donald Trump, it's about taking America back!
Where this gets creepy (and why this TV channel is pushing the idea) is that some people believe that A=432 is somehow magically found in nature and thus A=432 music has mystical healing properties. Another component of the conspiracy is that Goebbels mandated A=440 in Germany to subjugate the population because it made them more nervous. A good article debunking a lot of the conspiracy nonsense is here: https://jakubmarian.com/the-432-hz-vs-4 ... cy-theory/.
And:Fred Muggs wrote:As others have asked why are you only suing these three justices? We know that none of the nine justices were in favor of certifying your petition because no one filed a dissent to the dismissal. So again I ask why these three? BTW the letter writing is a waste of time. No court has ever ruled based on how many letters they received much less the Supreme Court. This is just stupid.
Patrick E. Craig wrote:I see that a troll called "Fred Mugs" has slipped in. Check out his page on FB. No friends (ZERO), a few anti-Trump posts, no info or history... definitely a troll. If he comments on your comment, just delete him, or hide the post.
It always has been Plan G (for Grift).
"For completeness":Alread have Plan E planned for when this Plan D fails. Which will be soon.
Loy Arlan Brunson has a pending lawsuit in the District of Utah, and he has filed an “Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus” seeking (1) the recusal of Chief Judge Robert J. Shelby and Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero, and (2) an order directing that his motion for leave to file a third amended complaint be granted and that service be made on the defendants. He also seeks both an award of $500 for the fee he paid to file his petition and a 2.9 billion dollar damages award against the judges. His petition is denied.
Just a weeeee bit egotistical and threat-y.Raland Brunson wrote:My neighbors and I are now preparing and sending letters to my Judge. I want him to know that this is more than just about me. It's about America. It's about We The People and the protection of our US Constitution.
I want him to give my defendants a chance to explain why it was important that they denied my petition to save America. I want a ton of letters to show up at his office. Boxes of letters. I want him to be thinking about this case before he sleeps, and the first thing he wakes up is how to deal with the thousands and thousands of letters that are piling up in his office. I want to remind him that his job depends on it. That his freedom depends on it. I want him to have the courage to do what he knows is the right thing.
Right now he's getting pressure from my defendants to dismiss this case but we, my brothers and I have given him the legal authority to allow this case to go forward. I want him to feel the pressure that his conscious will bear upon him as a result of our voice.
Join with me. Click on this link and you will see the letter that I want the judge to get from you. Click on the next link and the letter will be automatically sent for and on your behalf. Have the courage to do this. Your voice will echo with my voice into the heart and mind of this judge, this judge of mine who has the power to set this whole thing straight, and clean up America with one simple swipe of his pen. God bless you for your courage.
Which is just Jurisdictionary aka "Dr." Frederick Graves aka the person who sold Laity his degree.
Oh, the Lies You'll Tell!
The appear to be using the form letter from that enough is enough site. At least one lady was smart enough to actually copy the text and format it in a normal letter. Some have ended up in a docket entry.bob wrote: ↑Mon Apr 24, 2023 6:03 pmJust a weeeee bit egotistical and threat-y.Raland Brunson wrote:My neighbors and I are now preparing and sending letters to my Judge. I want him to know that this is more than just about me. It's about America. It's about We The People and the protection of our US Constitution.
I want him to give my defendants a chance to explain why it was important that they denied my petition to save America. I want a ton of letters to show up at his office. Boxes of letters. I want him to be thinking about this case before he sleeps, and the first thing he wakes up is how to deal with the thousands and thousands of letters that are piling up in his office. I want to remind him that his job depends on it. That his freedom depends on it. I want him to have the courage to do what he knows is the right thing.
Right now he's getting pressure from my defendants to dismiss this case but we, my brothers and I have given him the legal authority to allow this case to go forward. I want him to feel the pressure that his conscious will bear upon him as a result of our voice.
Join with me. Click on this link and you will see the letter that I want the judge to get from you. Click on the next link and the letter will be automatically sent for and on your behalf. Have the courage to do this. Your voice will echo with my voice into the heart and mind of this judge, this judge of mine who has the power to set this whole thing straight, and clean up America with one simple swipe of his pen. God bless you for your courage.
And I guess this legal scholar doesn't know federal judges have lifetime tenure.
Interesting move by the court. Usually such letters are bounced.orlylicious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 9:38 amThere are four letters and four envelopes. Most of the handwriting looks very shaky. Wonder if they knew their names and addresses would end up in a docket?
I was quite shocked to see the return addresses, then looked up the docket and realized that it was the court that failed to redact.bob wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:43 amInteresting move by the court. Usually such letters are bounced.orlylicious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 9:38 amThere are four letters and four envelopes. Most of the handwriting looks very shaky. Wonder if they knew their names and addresses would end up in a docket?
My WAG is the judge signaling that he's not persuaded by these form letters. And your (alleged) return address will be part of the public docket.
Is it the job of the court to redact info from a sender that includes information about the sender/filer? I would think that the filer/sender should request that. Orly managed to not redact her own credit card number on a docket, multiple times. The court did not see a need to do her work for her.W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:59 amI was quite shocked to see the return addresses, then looked up the docket and realized that it was the court that failed to redact.bob wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:43 amInteresting move by the court. Usually such letters are bounced.orlylicious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 9:38 amThere are four letters and four envelopes. Most of the handwriting looks very shaky. Wonder if they knew their names and addresses would end up in a docket?
My WAG is the judge signaling that he's not persuaded by these form letters. And your (alleged) return address will be part of the public docket.![]()
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.asp ... -1028.htmlNo. 22-1028
Title: Loy Arlan Brunson, Petitioner
v.
Alma S. Adams, et al.
Docketed: April 24, 2023
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Case Numbers: (23-4042)
DATE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS
Apr 19 2023 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 24, 2023)
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
Attorneys for Petitioner
Loy A. Brunson
Counsel of Record 55 North Merchant St.
#1631
American Fork, UT 84003
(801) 375-3278
Party name: Loy A. Brunson
Attorneys for Respondents
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Counsel of Record Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
202-514-2217
Party name: Alma S. Adams, et al.
The appeal opening brief has not even been filed yet, nor has he even paid the fee (or filed for IFP).orlylicious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 1:36 pm The grifting insanity continues. SCOTUS. This must be the "Rule 11" nonsense. The Petition isn't live yet. Added this to the Protopage.com/birther page.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.asp ... -1028.htmlNo. 22-1028
Title: Loy Arlan Brunson, Petitioner
v.
Alma S. Adams, et al.
Docketed: April 24, 2023
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Case Numbers: (23-4042)
DATE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS
Apr 19 2023 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 24, 2023)
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
Attorneys for Petitioner
Loy A. Brunson
Counsel of Record 55 North Merchant St.
#1631
American Fork, UT 84003
(801) 375-3278
Party name: Loy A. Brunson
Attorneys for Respondents
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Counsel of Record Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
202-514-2217
Party name: Alma S. Adams, et al.
There is no doc on the SCOTUS docket for the Writ, and I would have thought an application would have been necessary to jump over the appeals court directly to SCOTUS, but the Brunsons are special.10th Circuit Docket wrote:04/05/2023 Open Document [10989017] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/04/2023 Notice of appearance due on 04/19/2023 for all Appellees. Notice of appearance and fee or ifp forms due on 05/05/2023 for Loy Arlan Brunson. [23-4042] [Entered: 04/05/2023 09:48 AM]
04/11/2023 [10990427] Entry of appearance submitted by Anne E. Rice, Nathan H. Jack for Appellees Alma S. Adams, et al. for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 04/11/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-4042]--[Edited 04/11/2023 by AT to remove PDF as pleading was filed on 4/11/2023] --[Edited 04/12/2023 by SLS to condense docket text.] AER [Entered: 04/11/2023 10:03 AM]
04/11/2023 Open Document [10990535] Entry of appearance filed by Nathan Jack and Anne E. Rice for Appellees Alma S. Adams, et al. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y (The party listed is or was counsel of record). Served on 04/11/2023. Manner of Service: US mail [23-4042] --[Edited 04/12/2023 by SLS to condense docket text.] [Entered: 04/11/2023 12:15 PM]
No; yes.northland10 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 1:35 pm Is it the job of the court to redact info from a sender that includes information about the sender/filer? I would think that the filer/sender should request that.
A "Rule 11 cert. petition."
The feds, at most, will (again) waive a response.Raland Brunson wrote:Update on Plan D:
Our brother Loy's Petition made it to the US Supreme Court Docket! #22-1028 Yay!
We bypassed the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals using the Rule 11 (national emergency rule) and the US Supreme Court accepted it. We are now waiting for the Solicitor General to respond.
My dude: It is you who will be appealing all the way to SCOTUS.Update on Plan E:
As a result of the Court Order which was issued by my Federal Court Judge to the three Justices (that if they don't respond to my lawsuit against them, they would be removed from office) they lawyered up, complied with the order and filed a motion asking the judge to not let my case go forward on grounds that they are just too important to be sued, that they should be immune to such things, and that (in so many words) are above the Law. Well, this gives us the opportunity to file an opposition to this motion, and oppose it we will! They are submitting to the decision of my judge, which they can appeal all the way up to the US Supreme Court! What do I say about this? Ha ha, bring it on baby!
That is a creative way to interpret a boilerplate proposed scheduled order by a magistrate judge. There are no other orders in the federal case.bob wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 3:45 pmMy dude: It is you who will be appealing all the way to SCOTUS.Update on Plan E:
As a result of the Court Order which was issued by my Federal Court Judge to the three Justices (that if they don't respond to my lawsuit against them, they would be removed from office) they lawyered up, complied with the order and filed a motion asking the judge to not let my case go forward on grounds that they are just too important to be sued, that they should be immune to such things, and that (in so many words) are above the Law. Well, this gives us the opportunity to file an opposition to this motion, and oppose it we will! They are submitting to the decision of my judge, which they can appeal all the way up to the US Supreme Court! What do I say about this? Ha ha, bring it on baby!
![]()
There was another batch filed the same day. And some more on Monday.northland10 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 25, 2023 9:22 amThe appear to be using the form letter from that enough is enough site. At least one lady was smart enough to actually copy the text and format it in a normal letter. Some have ended up in a docket entry.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 26.8.0.pdf