trump (convicted felon, defamer, insurrectionist, contemnor, and rapist - $537M)

[Volkonski]

[bob]

Are there really any lawyers out there who would take this on?

Oh, sure: Giuliani, Klayman, Powell, Taitz, etc.

[Kendra]

https://www.axios.com/trump-lawsuit-fac ... umplawsuit

Former President Donald Trump, who has complained about censorship by social media giants, plans to announce class action lawsuits today against Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, sources tell Axios.

[Greatgrey]

Just starting to read…

Southern District of Florida

525756B8-EF0A-4094-83F0-0775233D84C3.jpeg (281.21 KiB) Viewed 1805 times

[Volkonski]

[Jim]

Just starting to read…

Southern District of Florida

525756B8-EF0A-4094-83F0-0775233D84C3.jpeg

IANAL and not sure how to access...could you provide the links if it's not asking too much?

[bob]

There's a bevy of lawyers who signed this.

Two causes of action: Violation of the First Amendment, and declaratory relief (saying section 230 is unconstitutional).

A well-dressed loser.

[RTH10260]

https:// twitter.com/sarafischer/status/1412768013275865089

Sara Fischer @sarafischer
Scoop: Trump plans to announce class action lawsuits today against Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, sources tell Axios.
Trump to sue Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter's Jack Dorsey, Google's Sundar Pichai
He's expected to file a class action lawsuit to represent broader complaints about social media policies.
axios.com
3:38 PM · Jul 7, 2021

What class would that be? All Republicans kicked off the platforms, poli-tick-ians kicked off the plattforms, everyone kicked off the plattforms?

[RTH10260]

PS. that crazy lady who chained herself to the Twitter HQ, can she also chain herself to this complaint ?

[Jim]

PS. that crazy lady who chained herself to the Twitter HQ, can she also chain herself to this complaint ?

No, but she can chain herself to Mar-A-Lago until Trump adds her to the class-action suits.

[bob]

Here's the proposed class for the Twitter suit:

All Twitter platform Members who reside in the United States, and between June 1, 2018, and today, had their access to their social media accounts wrongly restricted or curtailed by these Defendants and who were damaged thereby.

[Greatgrey]

Ummm…. Foreign?

195A4E17-535C-44FE-91AC-BE7159B80D12.jpeg (176.1 KiB) Viewed 1759 times

Cuz I see them incorporated in Delaware. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data ... 1dex31.htm

[RTH10260]

Here's the proposed class for the Twitter suit:

All Twitter platform Members who reside in the United States, and between June 1, 2018, and today, had their access to their social media accounts wrongly restricted or curtailed by these Defendants and who were damaged thereby.

How will they prove the "wrongly" part ? Depositions to the thousands?

[bob]

"Foreign corporation" just means a company doing business in a jurisdiction other than where it was incorporated.

[Dr. Ken]

So both twitter and facebook have TOS clauses about venues for any cause for actions against the companies. Florida is not the proper venue.

[Volkonski]

[Dr. Ken]

Isn't Coale Greta van Susteran's husband?

[neonzx]

Mike Dunford@questauthority

OK. So this isn't actually a lawsuit. It's a tweet with a filing fee. This is immediately apparent to any minimally competent attorney who so much as glances at the caption and causes of action.

That doesn't mean this is apparent to @IBOLLC
and the other clowns who signed this.
11:58 AM · Jul 7, 2021·Twitter Web App

https://twitter.com/questauthority/stat ... 3130353678

[Kendra]

Thanks all for posting these.

[dan1100]

Ummm…. Foreign?

195A4E17-535C-44FE-91AC-BE7159B80D12.jpeg

Cuz I see them incorporated in Delaware. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data ... 1dex31.htm

Foreign as in not from Florida.

That's the same boilerplate they use here.

[Uninformed]

I assume, possibly completely wrongly, that this is some sort of attempt to get Section 230 before the SCOTUS. I am often amazed at the convolutions of legal decisions.

[Volkonski]

IANAL but even I can see that these lawsuits are laughable.

[Dr. Ken]

[bob]

I assume, possibly completely wrongly, that this is some sort of attempt to get Section 230 before the SCOTUS.

That shirley will be the expressed motivation.

I assume this is a grift. It is basically a supersized version of the Loomer/Klayman failsuit.

[Dr. Ken]