Wait, I thought that they were coming here, collecting welfare, voting illegally and committing crimes while not having any jobs.raison de arizona wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2024 4:18 pm The casual racism continues.
Acyn @Acyn wrote: Trump: They’re taking the Black jobs…
x4
The MAGA nuts would wiling give them to him.....
Yep.
Uh... where are their daughters being dragged off to? And When?
Ya, complete fucking nonsense attracts me. Falsehoods unchallenged only fester and grow, remember that?
The General @GeneralMCNews wrote: BREAKING: President Putin says he takes Donald Trump's plan to end the war with Ukraine very seriously and Russia supports it.
Um. I have gone over all that crap with a magnifying glass and at no point did you actually say where, and how, or where "they" are coming for your daughters, right now or ever. All you put out there were bullshit distractions and gish galloping. Therefore, I have to conclude that you were blowing out your ass.sugar magnolia wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 1:08 pm Several points to make about that.
You aren't American, but slim cognito is, so I took "coming for your daughters" as I'm fairly certain it was intended, based on the context, as they'll be doing stupid shit and making stupid laws that only apply to the womenfolk, because they're too inept to think for themselves. You're the only one who mentioned dragging anyone anywhere. I'm sure she'll correct me if I took it (not in the literal, physical sense of taking) wrong.
You're a male, so you have no actual experience of what women deal with daily simply because of our gender. Legal, financial, employment, etc. It pervades our lives and women and POC are the fist to feel the pinch of any stupid shit they want to rain down on us. Man or bear isn't just a meme.
You have no children so what makes you feel you can speak for those who have daughters and sons who will be affected directly by stupid laws? Empathy in the abstract is one thing, but it just hits (not in the literal, physical sense of being hit) different when you are considering your own child. They absolutely are "coming for our daughters" already. Can you think of one single law that applies only to men?
As for the rest of it.....
Biden-Harris HQ @BidenHQ wrote: Trump salutes while playing an alternative national anthem at his rally, featuring violent January 6 insurrectionists: Please rise for the unfairly treated January 6 hostages
Biden-Harris HQ @BidenHQ wrote: Trump says he “wants to be able” to override the Constitution to “pick” when elections are held
Everything Sugar said - Yes!sugar magnolia wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:56 pm I'm going to assume that you are clueless about the many ways they have come for our daughters already because you are not a mother or a daughter or an American living with, or trying find a work around for their stupid laws.
No, you can't have an abortion because we said so.
No, you can't take that drug for your condition because it might have a different effect on another condition.
No, we won't charge him with sexual assault because you were wearing a low-cut blouse.
No, we still won't charge him with sexual assault because he's young and it'll ruin his life.
No, it's not sexual assault when it's just boys being boys.
No, we won't hire you to perform this job unless you sue us in Federal court and force us to.
No, we won't pay you what a man makes for the same job.
So, to answer your disingenuous question about how they are coming for our daughters, the ways are myriad and still accumulating. That list was just a few off the top of my head. It covers corporate, military, legal and healthcare.....there are many more.
As for insults aimed at you, they are in your imagination. Just because someone makes or rebuts a comment doesn't make it an insult or even necessarily directed at you. It's not surprising that you take them so personally though, since even a cursory glance at your posts will show your tendency to somehow just know what are people are thinking or what their motivations are for saying or doing a particular thing. If your feelings are hurt by people disagreeing with you then that is on you, not them.
x4 I think I'll vote for the candidate who won't need immunity from prosecution for breaking laws while performing official acts.
50 U.S.C. §3802sugar magnolia wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 1:08 pm Can you think of one single law that applies only to men?
Thank you.sugar magnolia wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:56 pm I'm going to assume that you are clueless about the many ways they have come for our daughters already because you are not a mother or a daughter or an American living with, or trying find a work around for their stupid laws.
No, you can't have an abortion because we said so.
No, you can't take that drug for your condition because it might have a different effect on another condition.
No, we won't charge him with sexual assault because you were wearing a low-cut blouse.
No, we still won't charge him with sexual assault because he's young and it'll ruin his life.
No, it's not sexual assault when it's just boys being boys.
No, we won't hire you to perform this job unless you sue us in Federal court and force us to.
No, we won't pay you what a man makes for the same job.
So, to answer your disingenuous question about how they are coming for our daughters, the ways are myriad and still accumulating. That list was just a few off the top of my head. It covers corporate, military, legal and healthcare.....there are many more.
As for insults aimed at you, they are in your imagination. Just because someone makes or rebuts a comment doesn't make it an insult or even necessarily directed at you. It's not surprising that you take them so personally though, since even a cursory glance at your posts will show your tendency to somehow just know what are people are thinking or what their motivations are for saying or doing a particular thing. If your feelings are hurt by people disagreeing with you then that is on you, not them.
I was just going to post that. I recall a conversation with a young woman a long time ago. She said it was the duty of every American woman to advance the feminist agenda. I asked her whether she had attempted to register for selective service, and whether she planned to file a lawsuit if her registration was denied. She was like, why would I do that?Res Ipsa wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:26 am50 U.S.C. §3802sugar magnolia wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 1:08 pm Can you think of one single law that applies only to men?
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter it shall be the duty of every male citizen of the United States, and every other male person residing in the United States, who, on the day or days fixed for the first or any subsequent registration, is between the ages of eighteen and twenty-six, to present himself for and submit to registration at such time or times and place or places, and in such manner, as shall be determined by proclamation of the President and by rules and regulations prescribed hereunder.
I guess growing up in an America where the government literally did come for my neighbor's sons makes that an easy question.
