https://twitter.com/stephen_richer/stat ... 4909052171
Stephen Richer—MaricopaCountyRecorder (prsnl acct) @stephen_richer wrote: Strange that there’s a publicly available United States Supreme Court case from 2013 requiring exactly this because of FEDERAL LAW, not Arizona law.
Arizona v ITCA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v ... prov=sfti1#
Here’s the first part of that entry:
“Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., 570 U.S. 1 (2013), is a 2012-term United States Supreme Court case revolving around Arizona's unique voter registration requirements, including the necessity of providing documentary proof of citizenship. In a 7–2 decision, the Supreme Court held that Arizona's registration requirements were unlawful because they were preempted by federal voting laws.”Elon Musk @elonmusk wrote: Another “conspiracy theory” turns out to be true.
Strange that Arizona requires proof of citizenship for state, but not federal elections x.com/jmichaelwaller…