Gielow has appeared in the comments to his "article." Some jerk* is trying to draw out from Gielow what he expects the AGoVA, exactly, to do.northland10 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 04, 2022 2:31 pmI do believe it was their favorite founder dude John Jay who, as SCOTUS CJ, told Pres Washington, "we don't do advisory opinions."Harold Gielow (to AGoVA) wrote wrote: Respectfully request you seek a U.S. Supreme Court decision defining, once and for all, the meaning of this US Constitutional eligibility requirement.
Gielow frames the issue as if the local election officials are violating the law (by not investigating candidates), which suggests Gielow believes the AGoVA should sue all the local election officials. But perhaps some jerk has put more thought into this than Gielow.
*