Peter Navarro's defense attorney is openly questioning in court why Navarro is being prosecuted, yet Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino are not
Defense alleges feds have animosity toward Navarro
US v Peter Navarro
- Volkonski
- Posts: 12500
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
- Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
- Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
- Verified: ✅
Re: US v Peter Navarro
“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
Re: US v Peter Navarro
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Doesn't look like Pete is gonna be legally allowed to own firearms pretty soon.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
Re: US v Peter Navarro
and I am so totally here for that.
Go ahead, Pete, jump.
Go ahead, Pete, jump.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
- Foggy
- Dick Tater
- Posts: 11466
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
- Location: Fogbow HQ
- Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
- Verified: grumpy ol' geezer
- roadscholar
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:17 am
- Location: Baltimore
- Occupation: Renaissance Mechanic
- Contact:
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Simple retort to that allegation:
“Why yes, Mr.Navarro, you are correct. We do have animosity toward people we believe broke the laws of the United States.”
“Why yes, Mr.Navarro, you are correct. We do have animosity toward people we believe broke the laws of the United States.”
The bitterest truth is more wholesome than the sweetest lie.
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Peter Navarro has rejected the government’s plea offer that he serve no more than 30 days in jail if he agrees to honor his subpoena. Let’s see what he says after his best pal Steve Bannon goes to trial next week.
- Foggy
- Dick Tater
- Posts: 11466
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
- Location: Fogbow HQ
- Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
- Verified: grumpy ol' geezer
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Hahaha, 30 days, he's looking at an unbelievable nightmare. Sadly (hahaha) he's just not tough enough for jail. They don't feed you great food in jail. The maid doesn't put a chocolate on your pillow at bedtime. They order you around and make you wear bad clothes. They treat you with no respect whatsoever. They're mean to you, and there isn't a goddamned thing you can do about it.
Jail isn't for spoiled babies, pal.
THIRTY DAYS.
Jail isn't for spoiled babies, pal.
THIRTY DAYS.
Re: US v Peter Navarro
I didn't originally post this link here, since in theory it wasn't about the Navarro contempt charges, but for anyone who might have missed this, I think Petey's might have more troubles coming down the pike. Unless maybe he didn't know what his aide was doing?
Re: US v Peter Navarro
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 8e41324172
NEW YORK (AP) — The Justice Department filed suit Wednesday against Peter Navarro, claiming the former adviser to Donald Trump used an unofficial email account while working in the White House and wrongfully retained presidential records.
The lawsuit in federal court in Washington claims Navarro used at least one “non-official" email account — a ProtonMail account — to send and receive emails. The legal action comes just weeks after Navarro was indicted on criminal charges after refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.
The civil cases alleges that by using the unofficial email account, Navarro failed to turn over presidential records to the National Archives and Records Administration.
The Justice Department is asking a federal judge for an order “authorizing the recovery of any Presidential records in the possession, custody, and/or control of Mr. Navarro.” The suit also seeks unspecified damages.
“Mr. Navarro is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration,” the suit states.
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
Re: US v Peter Navarro
"I accidently wiped my phone... honest, Your Honor."
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
Re: US v Peter Navarro
I so hope one of the news stations can find some old video of Navarro complaining about Hillary's emails
So much cray-cray this week and it's only Wednesday. Lots of material of Acosta's block on CNN Saturday afternoon, but how will the prime time lineup on Fox spin all this stuff?
So much cray-cray this week and it's only Wednesday. Lots of material of Acosta's block on CNN Saturday afternoon, but how will the prime time lineup on Fox spin all this stuff?
- northland10
- Posts: 6682
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
- Location: Northeast Illinois
- Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
- Verified: ✅ I'm me.
Re: US v Peter Navarro
After all the Hilary screaming, you'd think these folks would have been more careful about things like email and records.
101010
- Phoenix520
- Posts: 4152
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
- Verified: ✅
Re: US v Peter Navarro
It feels like Karma has reached our sector on her millennial rounds. Here’s hoping she hangs around for a while.Kendra wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:35 pm I so hope one of the news stations can find some old video of Navarro complaining about Hillary's emails
So much cray-cray this week and it's only Wednesday. Lots of material of Acosta's block on CNN Saturday afternoon, but how will the prime time lineup on Fox spin all this stuff?
- Tiredretiredlawyer
- Posts: 8182
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:07 pm
- Location: Rescue Pets Land
- Occupation: 21st Century Suffragist
- Verified: ✅🐴🐎🦄🌻5000 posts and counting
Re: US v Peter Navarro
The rules don't apply to them, only to everyone else.northland10 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 pm After all the Hilary screaming, you'd think these folks would have been more careful about things like email and records.
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Peter Navarro trashes Jared Kushner, saying he is lying about thyroid cancer in his book for sympathy, and cost Trump re-election: “Mismanagement of the campaign .. the pandemic .. the guy was just a one-man wrecking crew. His only qualification was he was the boss’s son-in-law.”
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Well, he hired you, so that tends to support your thesis.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17395
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Back to jail 5pm
- Ben-Prime
- Posts: 3150
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:29 pm
- Location: Worldwide Availability
- Occupation: Managing People Who Manage Machines
- Verified: ✅MamaSaysI'mBonaFide
Re: US v Peter Navarro
But the sunshine aye shall light the sky,
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.
- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.
- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Not here, I haven't found anyone live tweeting, dangit.
- Luke
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
- Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Here's what Petey filed on August 4th now that he has counsel (44 pages). He had plenty of money for lawyers, it was his choice to not be represented. Lots of whining, "I didn't knows" & complaining. Sample footnote:
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... compel.pdf
3 / Dr. Navarro, a layman who at the time was not represented by counsel, understood President
Trump’s instructions to be equivalent to an assertion of testimonial immunity. He advised the
Coronavirus Subcommittee that he could not comply with its subpoena and suggested that it
resolve the privilege issues directly with President Trump. The Subcommittee did not pursue the
matter, which confirmed to Dr. Navarro his understanding that, in the absence of agreement
between the Executive and Legislative branches, he was not obligated to comply with the
subpoena.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... compel.pdf
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Peter Navarro claims that he has “circumstantial evidence” that Liz Cheney is going to try and steal her election tomorrow with fraudulent absentee ballots.