US v Peter Navarro
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Every time I land on this thread, "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime," comes into my head.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
- Phoenix520
- Posts: 4152
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
- Verified: ✅
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Eggsackly, Andy!
And too also, if you weren’t such an unpleasant fellow to deal with you might have been treated with more respect. As it is, sir, you got the respect you deserve. Asshat.
And too also, if you weren’t such an unpleasant fellow to deal with you might have been treated with more respect. As it is, sir, you got the respect you deserve. Asshat.
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Didn't we already see this bullshite on The Roger Stone Show?
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
Re: US v Peter Navarro
He could have paid $5k and spent an afternoon playing "I don't recall" and "Plead the 5th" and been done with it. What really burns me about it is he is a wealthy man more or less, he has a decent income from book royalties and I'm betting he pulls down as much as the rubes make a week for doing an appearance on Fox News etc... Half the suckers he's begging money from probably don't have squat saved are are still counting on Social Security. I dunno about you, but if I was gonna have to figure out how to get by on $1400 a month when I retired I wouldn't be giving it away to an asshole who didn't just ask to be where he ended up, he got down on his knees and begged.raison de arizona wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 3:22 pm To put a couple numbers to it, Navarro is worth ~$5M, he is soliciting people to buy his latest book (he has many published) in order to fund his defense, which he estimates will cost $300-400k. IANAL, but based on what I've learned here and elsewhere, that estimate is probably fair for what he has in mind.
TL;DR Phuck him
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Yeah, that's why it's hard for me to garner any sympathy. He didn't HAVE to tell them crap, but he HAD to appear. He had months upon months just get it done, and instead he played stupid games and now he's winning stupid prizes. I only wish Meadows was a winner too.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- keith
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:23 pm
- Location: The Swamp in Victorian Oz
- Occupation: Retired Computer Systems Analyst Project Manager Super Coder
- Verified: ✅lunatic
Re: US v Peter Navarro
And what else would the arresting officers do with a fugitive that attempting to escape apprehension and with obvious means to escape jurisdiction.
Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls Would scarcely get your feet wet
- MN-Skeptic
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
- Location: Twin Cities
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Tim Walz’ Golden Rule: Mind your own damn business!
Re: US v Peter Navarro
DC Judge cracks back at Peter Navarro:
"In the last 2 days, Defendant has twice communicated with the court by emailing the courtroom deputy, without copying government counsel. This is not proper. Defendant is not permitted to have ex-parte communications with the court"
- Reality Check
- Posts: 2557
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:46 pm
- Verified: ✅ Curmudgeon
- Contact:
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Navarro is the perfect example of the kind of morons Trump attracts like flies to
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Speaking of dumb assed economists, tfg is quoting Art Laffer as proof of how bad Biden's inflation is, "These inflation numbers are catastrophic!" Laffer says.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Off Topic
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/ ... 4dc14403d/The other major plan was proposed by President Reagan, who made tax reform the cornerstone of his second term, similar to the way he made tax reduction the cornerstone of his first term. Remember that? It was back when everybody was talking about supply-side economics, which was based on the Laffer Curve, which is this mysterious curve that became famous when an economist named Arthur Laffer drew it, at a party, on a napkin belonging to Rep. Jack Kemp. I'm not making this up.
...
What the Laffer Curve allegedly showed, when you held it in a certain light, was that if the government reduced everybody's taxes, it would make MORE MONEY, and the federal budget deficit would go away. I admit that, as I look back on it, this theory seems even stupider than throwing beverages into Boston Harbor, but, at the time, it had a very strong appeal. Kemp started showing his napkin around Washington, and soon many people were excited about supply-side economics. It was similar to those stories you sometimes see in the newspaper about how some Third World village gets all riled up when a peasant woman discovers a yam shaped exactly like the Virgin Mary.
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Everyone remember the biggest tax cut in history in 81, but everyone forgets that Reagan proposed the biggest tax hike in history in 82.
Hic sunt dracones
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Peter Navarro's arraignment in Contempt of Congress criminal case is set for Friday
Re: US v Peter Navarro
In new court filing, Peter Navarro has complaints about day of his arrest, saying he "spent several hours in that jail cell out of communication w/ anyone & was surprised when just minutes before his appearance before a magistrate, he was told he could meet w/ a public defender"
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17395
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Worked for a government and totally ignorant on judicial procedures?
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
Re: US v Peter Navarro
tek wrote: ↑Sun Jun 12, 2022 7:45 amOff Topichttps://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/ ... 4dc14403d/The other major plan was proposed by President Reagan, who made tax reform the cornerstone of his second term, similar to the way he made tax reduction the cornerstone of his first term. Remember that? It was back when everybody was talking about supply-side economics, which was based on the Laffer Curve, which is this mysterious curve that became famous when an economist named Arthur Laffer drew it, at a party, on a napkin belonging to Rep. Jack Kemp. I'm not making this up.
...
What the Laffer Curve allegedly showed, when you held it in a certain light, was that if the government reduced everybody's taxes, it would make MORE MONEY, and the federal budget deficit would go away. I admit that, as I look back on it, this theory seems even stupider than throwing beverages into Boston Harbor, but, at the time, it had a very strong appeal. Kemp started showing his napkin around Washington, and soon many people were excited about supply-side economics. It was similar to those stories you sometimes see in the newspaper about how some Third World village gets all riled up when a peasant woman discovers a yam shaped exactly like the Virgin Mary.
Start showing Republicans a plan where they can convince the rubes to let them cut taxes for the rich and they get so many boners that Viagra sales fall off a cliff.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Black kids who survive getting pulled over for expired tags get a free phone and press agent when they get arrested as well as access to the finest legal talent in the jurisdiction. They are freed immediately and spend days in consultation with their legal team before araignment,
Don't they?
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
Re: US v Peter Navarro
JUST IN: DOJ says it does not have any video of Navarro’s arrest on the jetway of Reagan National Airport
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Translation "Go bug the airport if you want video recordings, Navarro. Some of us have actual work to do, beanbag-head"
Hic sunt dracones
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17395
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
Re: US v Peter Navarro
A bit unusual that police would not wear body cams. Was it perhaps the Marshal law Service that put him in handcuffs?
- raison de arizona
- Posts: 20219
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
- Location: Nothing, Arizona
- Occupation: bit twiddler
- Verified: ✔️ he/him/his
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Federal agents are required to wear body cams when making pre-planned arrests.
https://www.npr.org/2021/06/08/10044725 ... ody-cameraFederal agents will now be required to wear body cameras when executing search warrants or making pre-planned arrests, according to a new policy outlined Monday by the Justice Department's second highest-ranking official.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
- MN-Skeptic
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
- Location: Twin Cities
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Tim Walz’ Golden Rule: Mind your own damn business!
- Gregg
- Posts: 5502
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
- Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
- Occupation: We build cars
Re: US v Peter Navarro
Pro se it is then.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.