The sufferings we endure.ObjectiveDoubter wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:35 pmI'd like to bait her and inquire what the "unprofessional" behavior might have been, but since I reported her for exposing BO's SS#, she's blocked me.
)
Thanks for that. Nice to have a collection of Mixed Nuts to read when I get bored at Facebook.Orlylicious wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 10:23 pmOD, you gave me a great idea and I just did it!
..............
So, when you complain that your TV won't turn on, we can assume you secretly binge watch Fox News and Newsmax.Sterngard Friegen wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:12 pmThanks, 'licious. (I can't quite bring myself to using your entire name.) Next project for you: A device that will immediately shut off my television whenever Trump is speaking, unless the words are "I am resigning."
Chalerialicious has a nice ring to it.Sterngard Friegen wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:12 pmThanks, 'licious. (I can't quite bring myself to using your entire name.)
LenaliciousWhip wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 1:09 pmChalerialicious has a nice ring to it.Sterngard Friegen wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:12 pmThanks, 'licious. (I can't quite bring myself to using your entire name.)
x6 
x2 
x4 
x2 
RealClearPolitics.com gives incorrect average of 6 polls, giving Biden 11.6% lead in Dem party primary when he has only 8.5% lead. They artificially claim that Biden’s lead is in double digits when it is only around 8% according to the average of polls. They scheme and prop Biden because he is doing better against Trump than others
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/realclearpo ... s-when-it/ Biden and Trump are in a statistical tie, only 4% difference in a poll with 4% margin of error
General Election: Trump vs. Biden Rasmussen Reports Biden 48, Trump 44 Biden +4
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/biden-and-t ... -of-error/ 
x6 x2 x4 x2Her face bears a slight resemblance to Kellyanne Conway. Perhaps Taitz could have a role in the next remake of Dave?
So, she assumed the spread was an average of the spread and not the spread of the averages from the polls.bob wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:31 pmRealClearPolitics.com gives incorrect average of 6 polls, giving Biden 11.6% lead in Dem party primary when he has only 8.5% lead. They artificially claim that Biden’s lead is in double digits when it is only around 8% according to the average of polls. They scheme and prop Biden because he is doing better against Trump than others
Dentistry, law, real estate, and now polling? Is there nothing can't do incompetently? E.g.:
Um... 1.5 is a little less than 4.Biden and Trump are in a statistical tie, only 4% difference in a poll with 4% margin of error
General Election: Trump vs. Biden Rasmussen Reports Biden 48, Trump 44 Biden +4
Strange. When I pull up a calculator and calculate the poll average, I get exactly the same number that RealClearPolitics does. Maybe my calculator is busted (probably using the same one as RCP). I'm sure Orly couldn't be wrong.bob wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:31 pmRealClearPolitics.com gives incorrect average of 6 polls, giving Biden 11.6% lead in Dem party primary when he has only 8.5% lead. They artificially claim that Biden’s lead is in double digits when it is only around 8% according to the average of polls. They scheme and prop Biden because he is doing better against Trump than others
Dentistry, law, real estate, and now polling? Is there nothing can't do incompetently? E.g.:
Northland10 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 3:08 pmSo, she assumed the spread was an average of the spread and not the spread of the averages from the polls.
:
The site that everyone quotes is misleading the public, hiding the fact that Biden’s lead in the Dem primary went down to single digits and Trump is much stronger against other candidates
Biden’s lead in dem party primary went down significantly from 30% to as little as 2% in the latest CNN poll. The average that counts even the most bogus polls shows that Biden’s lead is now in single digits. However the web site that everyone is relying on, Real ClearPolitics.com is fudging the numbers in order for the public to believe that Biden still has the double digit lead.
Here is my comment sent to to RealClearPolitics.com about them misleading the public:Somebody keeps doing wrong averages. You show 4 poll results of Dem party primary from 07.01-07.09. The results are 7%, 4%, 12% and 15%. You write that the average is 11%. This is wrong. The correct average of these 4 numbers is 9.5%. I commented on your wrong averages before. Either someone can’t do basic math or someone is trying to defraud the public by creating a false impression that Biden’s lead is in double digits, which is bad for Trump, as Biden is the strongest Dem against Trump. I am posting these comments on my site TaitzReport.com, so the public can see that you post wrong averages.
PS, you removed from this average the recent CNN poll where Biden’s lead was only 2% and the average was even lower. Stop misleading the public!
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/the-site-th ... andidates/ x6 x2 x4 x2 Soviet math is different. Always has been. Always will be. With Soviet math you first take the answer you want and then work backwards.TexasFilly wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 3:57 pmMy son's orthodontist is a neighbor. His Christmas lights are always perfectly straight. Who wouldn't want a dentist who can't do arithmetic?
Sekrit Stuffs!
And even then it doesn't work, as witness most if not all of the famous Five Year Plans. Or Sochi.ZekeB wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:17 pmSoviet math is different. Always has been. Always will be. With Soviet math you first take the answer you want and then work backwards.TexasFilly wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 3:57 pmMy son's orthodontist is a neighbor. His Christmas lights are always perfectly straight. Who wouldn't want a dentist who can't do arithmetic?
Sekrit Stuffs!
X 4 
