Spring forward.
To delete this message, click the X at top right.

TX Anti-Abortion Law

Post Reply
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 14353
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

TX Anti-Abortion Law

#1

Post by RTH10260 »

Citizens, Not the State, Will Enforce New Abortion Law in Texas
The measure bans abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy. And it effectively deputizes ordinary citizens to sue people involved in the process.

By Sabrina Tavernise
July 9, 2021 Updated 10:30 a.m. ET

People across the country may soon be able to sue abortion clinics, doctors and anyone helping a woman get an abortion in Texas, under a new state law that contains a legal innovation with broad implications for the American court system.

The provision passed the Texas State Legislature this spring as part of a bill that bans abortion after a doctor detects a fetal heartbeat, usually at about six weeks of pregnancy. Many states have passed such bans, but the law in Texas is different.

Ordinarily, enforcement would be up to government officials, and if clinics wanted to challenge the law’s constitutionality, they would sue those officials in making their case. But the law in Texas prohibits officials from enforcing it. Instead, it takes the opposite approach, effectively deputizing ordinary citizens — including from outside Texas — to sue clinics and others who violate the law. It awards them at least $10,000 per illegal abortion if they are successful.

“It’s completely inverting the legal system,” said Stephen Vladeck, a constitutional law professor at the University of Texas at Austin. “It says the state is not going to be the one to enforce this law. Your neighbors are.”

The result is a law that is extremely difficult to challenge before it takes effect on Sept. 1, because it is hard to know whom to sue to block it, and lawyers for clinics are now wrestling with what to do about it. Six-week bans in other states have all been blocked as they make their way through the court system.


https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/09/us/a ... texas.html
User avatar
neeneko
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:32 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#2

Post by neeneko »

I wonder how HIPAA might interact with this law since it requires the plaintiff to have rather specific medical information about someone.
User avatar
p0rtia
Posts: 4916
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:55 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#3

Post by p0rtia »

neeneko wrote: Fri Jul 09, 2021 1:08 pm I wonder how HIPAA might interact with this law since it requires the plaintiff to have rather specific medical information about someone.
Since when does HIPAA set guidelines for pitchfoks and torches?
User avatar
zekeb
Posts: 664
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:12 pm
Location: Strawberry Hill
Occupation: Stable genius. One who tosses horseshit with a pitchfork and never misses the spreader.

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#4

Post by zekeb »

neeneko wrote: Fri Jul 09, 2021 1:08 pm I wonder how HIPAA might interact with this law since it requires the plaintiff to have rather specific medical information about someone.
Knowing how these people operate, it wouldn't surprise me if a pregnant woman has an abortion and gives the plaintiff every last detail.
Il factotum
User avatar
neeneko
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:32 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#5

Post by neeneko »

zekeb wrote: Fri Jul 09, 2021 1:12 pm Knowing how these people operate, it wouldn't surprise me if a pregnant woman has an abortion and gives the plaintiff every last detail.
Yeah, the two main ways I could see is if either the woman was one of the plaintiffs, or there was some earlier doctor's visit that confirmed the fetal heartbeat that someone else was privy to.
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10497
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#6

Post by Kendra »

But...aren't the republicans all over the no-vaccine/no-mask because it's their right to say what they do with their body? :confuzzled: :confuzzled: :confuzzled:
User avatar
RVInit
Posts: 3830
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:48 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#7

Post by RVInit »

Part of me wants to believe that this wouldn't survive SCOTUS (standing?).

Ok, lawyers, do your thing, :prettyplease: Any thoughts?
There's a lot of things that need to change. One specifically? Police brutality.
--Colin Kaepernick
User avatar
LM K
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:44 pm
Location: Oregon
Occupation: Professor Shrinky Lady, brainwashing young adults daily!
Contact:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#8

Post by LM K »

This is fucked up.

This will motivate additional violence against healthcare professionals and clinics.
"The jungle is no place for a cellist."
From "Take the Money and Run"
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#9

Post by bob »

RVInit wrote: Fri Jul 09, 2021 1:59 pm Part of me wants to believe that this wouldn't survive SCOTUS (standing?).
Not standing per se, but a related-enough concept: No injury/no damages. How am I harmed if my neighbor has an abortion?

What is insidious about this law, however, is it encourages harassment. If literally anybody can sue anybody, the lawsuits will pile up quickly. And fighting paper terrorism isn't free. Like Klayman, etc., the goal isn't to win, but to threaten so much suffering as to deter.

At some point, an interested group will have to sue (on behalf of Roe plaintiffs) the state to get the law declared unconstitutional.
LM K wrote: Fri Jul 09, 2021 2:36 pmThis will motivate additional violence against healthcare professionals and clinics.
Yeah; I expect clinics' parking lots to become a place to "identify" future defendants.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
RVInit
Posts: 3830
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:48 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#10

Post by RVInit »

Thanks!

Lordy, what will they think of next? I don't really want to know, actually. I wanna hide my head in the sand for while. For a short time, at least.
There's a lot of things that need to change. One specifically? Police brutality.
--Colin Kaepernick
User avatar
Lani
Posts: 2507
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:42 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#11

Post by Lani »

It's not a heart beat, and the baby is still an embryo, not a fetus.
It's been only in the last few decades that doctors have even been able to detect this flutter at six weeks, thanks to the use of more-sophisticated ultrasound technologies, Aftab said. Previously, the technology wasn't advanced enough to detect the flutter that early on in pregnancy.

Although a lot of weight seems to be put on the detection of this flutter, "by no means does it translate to viability of the heart" or viability of the pregnancy, Aftab said.

The heart still has a lot of development to undergo before it is fully formed. Indeed, the entire first trimester of pregnancy is a time of "organogenesis," or the formation of organs, Aftab said.

After the detection of the flutter at six weeks, the heart muscle continues to develop over the next four to six weeks, undergoing the folding and bending that needs to happen for the heart to take its final shape, Aftab said.

"A lot of the heart development is still ongoing" during the first trimester, she said.
https://www.livescience.com/65501-fetal ... ained.html
Image You can't wait until life isn't hard anymore before you decide to be happy.
Uninformed
Posts: 2095
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#12

Post by Uninformed »

It’s a great day when legislators pass laws that can’t be misused or abused. :mrgreen:
If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
Tiredretiredlawyer
Posts: 7541
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:07 pm
Location: Rescue Pets Land
Occupation: 21st Century Suffragist
Verified: ✅🐴🐎🦄🌻5000 posts and counting

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#13

Post by Tiredretiredlawyer »

Calling it a "heartbeat" is the first wrong. There is no heartbeat there until there is a heart.

And so fucking what if there is a "heartbeat"! Is the embryo/fetus viable? R u willing to adopt said embryo/fetus and take on all medical expenses you don't want the government to provide?
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
User avatar
Frater I*I
Posts: 3210
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:52 am
Location: City of Dis, Seventh Circle of Hell
Occupation: Certificated A&P Mechanic
Verified: ✅Verified Devilish Hyena
Contact:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#14

Post by Frater I*I »

Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: Fri Jul 09, 2021 4:19 pm Calling it a "heartbeat" is the first wrong. There is no heartbeat there until there is a heart.

And so fucking what if there is a "heartbeat"! Is the embryo/fetus viable? R u willing to adopt said embryo/fetus and take on all medical expenses you don't want the government to provide?
Hell naw!!! That fetus better come out with bootstraps to pull itself up by....

I'll come in again... :bag:
"He sewed his eyes shut because he is afraid to see, He tries to tell me what I put inside of me
He's got the answers to ease my curiosity, He dreamed a god up and called it Christianity"

Trent Reznor
User avatar
Tiredretiredlawyer
Posts: 7541
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:07 pm
Location: Rescue Pets Land
Occupation: 21st Century Suffragist
Verified: ✅🐴🐎🦄🌻5000 posts and counting

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#15

Post by Tiredretiredlawyer »

So true! We love you til you're born!
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 17654
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#16

Post by raison de arizona »

Lawsuit targets Texas abortion law deputizing citizens to enforce six-week ban

Abortion rights advocates and providers filed a federal lawsuit in Texas on Tuesday seeking to block a new state law empowering individuals to sue anyone assisting a woman with getting an abortion, including those who provide financial help or drive a pregnant patient to a clinic.

A dozen states have passed laws banning abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy. But the Texas law, set to take effect in September, goes further by incentivizing private citizens to help enforce the ban — awarding them at least $10,000 if their court challenges are successful. Even religious leaders who counsel a pregnant woman considering an abortion could be liable, according to the lawsuit filed in Austin by the Center for Reproductive Rights, Planned Parenthood and the ACLU on behalf of several other groups.

Proponents of the measure, which had the backing of the Republican governor, cheered passage of the “heartbeat bill” as a landmark victory.

But abortion providers say the law, known as S.B. 8, is unconstitutional and will subject them to endless lawsuits, shut down clinics and reduce services — and they say it will isolate abortion patients by undermining support networks for pregnant women.

“The state has put a bounty on the head of any person or entity who so much as gives a patient money for an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, before most people know they are pregnant,” Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights said in a statement. “Worse, it will intimidate loved ones from providing support for fear of being sued.”

Texas governor signs abortion bill banning procedure as early as six weeks into pregnancy

Although abortion patients themselves cannot be sued under the Texas law, a controlling parent, disapproving neighbor or abusive spouse could target the woman’s doctor in court to try to stop the abortion.
:snippity:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 14353
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#17

Post by RTH10260 »

Texas Can Ban Common Form of Second-Trimester Abortion, Appeals Court Rules
The lower court “committed numerous, reversible legal and factual errors,” according to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

By Azi Paybarah
Published Aug. 18, 2021
Updated Aug. 19, 2021, 12:04 a.m. ET

A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld a Texas law banning the most common form of second-trimester abortion, ruling that a lower court had erred in finding that the law imposed “an undue burden on a large fraction of women.”

At issue is a Texas law that was passed in 2017 but has not yet been in effect because of legal battles. The law, known as Senate Bill 8, prohibits a dilation-and-evacuation abortion method and requires doctors to use alternative abortion methods, according to Wednesday’s decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

A Federal District Court judge had found that the 2017 law “imposes an undue burden on a large fraction of women” because it “amounted to a ban on all D&E abortions.”

That interpretation is wrong, the appeals court said on Wednesday. Records show that “doctors can safely perform D&Es and comply with SB8 using methods that are already in widespread use,” according to Wednesday’s ruling.

The lower court “committed numerous, reversible legal and factual errors,” according to the decision on Wednesday.

“Accordingly,” it continued, “we VACATE the district court’s permanent injunction.”



https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/18/us/a ... uling.html
Atticus Finch
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:59 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#18

Post by Atticus Finch »

I heard that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is moving to Kabul and become the Supreme Court of Afghanistan.
You don't need religion to have morals. If you can't determine right from wrong then you lack empathy, not religion.
User avatar
Lani
Posts: 2507
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:42 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#19

Post by Lani »

Texas 6-week abortion ban takes effect after Supreme Court inaction
https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/01/politics ... index.html
Image You can't wait until life isn't hard anymore before you decide to be happy.
User avatar
neeneko
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:32 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#20

Post by neeneko »

I am curious to see how this is going to play out... will it be struck down, or become a template for passing gun control laws?

Though now I am picturing at how this same pattern could be used for handling other areas where police do not have the resources or interest in handling.... could become a nightmare of 'sting' and 'auditing' since it pretty much does away with the whole standing question.
User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 6555
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
Location: Too close to trump
Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#21

Post by Slim Cognito »

I still don't get how someone, other than possibly the father, would have standing to sue.
Pup Dennis in training to be a guide dog & given to a deserving vet. Thx! ImageImageImage x4
W. Kevin Vicklund
Posts: 2131
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:26 pm

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#22

Post by W. Kevin Vicklund »

Slim Cognito wrote: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:29 pm I still don't get how someone, other than possibly the father, would have standing to sue.
States aren't bound by federal standing doctrine, though they often choose to enact similar doctrines.
User avatar
neeneko
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:32 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#23

Post by neeneko »

Slim Cognito wrote: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:29 pm I still don't get how someone, other than possibly the father, would have standing to sue.
I think that is part of the point and why this could potentially blow up. As I understand it, the law does not require standing for you to sue, it is a bounty system.
W. Kevin Vicklund
Posts: 2131
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:26 pm

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#24

Post by W. Kevin Vicklund »

Wikipedia has a decent explanation of how this type of law is structured:
In the United States, a private attorney general is an informal term for a private attorney who brings a lawsuit considered to be in the public interest, i.e., benefiting the general public and not just the plaintiff, on behalf of a citizen or group of citizens. The attorney may, at the equitable discretion of the court, be entitled to recover attorney's fees if he or she prevails. The rationale behind this principle is to provide extra incentive to private attorneys to pursue suits that may be of benefit to society at large.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_a ... 20citizens.
User avatar
SuzieC
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am
Location: Blue oasis in red state
Occupation: retired lawyer; yoga enthusiast
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#25

Post by SuzieC »

https://statuskuo.substack.com/p/the-te ... the-courts

Texas Handmaiden law goes into effect. Abortion vigilantes can sue anytime they suspect someone might have an abortion. Women should be leaving Texas. Now.
Post Reply

Return to “Law and Lawsuits”