Page 2 of 5

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:01 pm
by sad-cafe
testimony yesterday revealed that a 3 month old baby was one of the videos he watched.


this man is a sick f@%#k

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:44 pm
by LM K
The prosecuion has strong evidence that shows Duggar was at his car lot at the time porn was downloading onto his work computer.

Duggar was downloading on the partition of the computer that only he had access to

AnnaDarlingTV is taking a break from trial this morning, so she hasn't tweeted much this morning.








Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 2:55 pm
by LM K
sad-cafe wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:01 pm testimony yesterday revealed that a 3 month old baby was one of the videos he watched.

this man is a sick f@%#k
I'm hiding most of my comment so that folks can decide what they do and do not want to read.

The gov knows who made some of the porn found on Duggar's computer.

Duggar needs to go away for life.

Note: you've been warned.
► Show Spoiler

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 3:04 pm
by raison de arizona
sad-cafe wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:01 pm testimony yesterday revealed that a 3 month old baby was one of the videos he watched.


this man is a sick f@%#k
He's not a man, he's a piece of garbage. He should go away forever, there is something severely broken in him that can never be fixed.

Thx for putting the deets behind the spoiler tag LM K, it is appreciated.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 6:56 pm
by LM K



Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 6:57 pm
by LM K
spiduh wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 3:04 pm
sad-cafe wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:01 pm testimony yesterday revealed that a 3 month old baby was one of the videos he watched.


this man is a sick f@%#k
He's not a man, he's a piece of garbage. He should go away forever, there is something severely broken in him that can never be fixed.

Thx for putting the deets behind the spoiler tag LM K, it is appreciated.
:thumbsup:

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:41 pm
by Kriselda Gray
LM K wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 2:55 pmI'm hiding most of my comment so that folks can decide what they do and do not want to read.

The gov knows who made some of the porn found on Duggar's computer.

Duggar needs to go away for life.

Note: you've been warned.
OMFG. I'm glad the Philippines are thinking of bringing back the death penalty for him - he absolutely deserves it.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:02 pm
by Maybenaut
Kriselda Gray wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:41 pm OMFG. I'm glad the Philippines are thinking of bringing back the death penalty for him - he absolutely deserves it.
Off Topic
Kriselda! :bighug:

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:14 pm
by Kriselda Gray
Maybenaut wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:02 pm
Kriselda Gray wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:41 pm OMFG. I'm glad the Philippines are thinking of bringing back the death penalty for him - he absolutely deserves it.
Off Topic
Kriselda! :bighug:
Off Topic
Maybenaut! :dance: :bighug:

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:58 pm
by Tiredretiredlawyer
Off Topic
Kriselda!!!! Love your new look!

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 9:40 pm
by Kriselda Gray
Off Topic
Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 8:58 pm
Off Topic
Kriselda!!!! Love your new look!
Thanks! I like yours, too - that's gorgeous!

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:17 am
by LM K
I found a good source on Reddit for trial coverage.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:20 am
by p0rtia
Kriselda Gray wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:41 pm

OMFG. I'm glad the Philippines are thinking of bringing back the death penalty for him - he absolutely deserves it.
:thumbsup: :bighug: Good to see you. :heart:

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 8:41 am
by Kriselda Gray
p0rtia wrote: Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:20 am
Kriselda Gray wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:41 pm

OMFG. I'm glad the Philippines are thinking of bringing back the death penalty for him - he absolutely deserves it.
:thumbsup: :bighug: Good to see you. :heart:
Thanks!! :bighug:

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 11:38 pm
by W. Kevin Vicklund
Storytime: Way back in the early to mid 'oughts, one of the ladies in our group of friends started dating a guy. At first, I assumed that my feeling of unease was due to his weight (I freely acknowledge that society has imbued certain biases in me, which I actively work to suppress), but after a bit he started trying to show the other guys the porn he had stored on his mobile device. We were all really uncomfortable with it, and then he started trying to show us nudes of her (I think they were married by then, but it blurs). Ick. Major creeper alarms going off. But his wife was a very good friend, so we just told him to stop. Fast forward a couple of years, and I find myself having to hang out with him for the day while the ladies held a baby shower for his wife (8 months pregnant with his daughter*). Sure enough, he started trying to show me his porn collection on his home computer setup. I looked him in the eye and told him if he had any child pornography he better trash his hard drives, because he was about to have a daughter and couldn't afford to be caught with that type of shit. Later on, he mentioned that work had provided some of the computers so he could work from home after hours. :vomit:

2 months later, he was busted for child pornography after some jerk :whistle: left an anonymous tip that he was using work computers for pornography. Sadly, our friend decided not to divorce him and they got back together when he was released from prison.

*who a few years ago announced he was a boy

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 4:36 pm
by LM K
Defense just closed.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:25 pm
by woodworker
I guess that they decided putting the smug molester on the stand was not a good idea. So sad.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:27 pm
by RVInit
Aside from some terminology, this is spot on.


Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:02 am
by Frater I*I
The Duggers need to come to grips with the fact that they will be burying Josh within a year.

There's a hierarchy of sins even amongst the damned, and child abuse is the lowest of the low.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:11 pm
by LM K
Case went to jury at 12:15 CST.

Josh was seen giving hugs to family willing to hug him. Jim Bob Duggar is attended trial yesterday and is attending today.

I expect a verdict today.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:13 pm
by LM K
Good source that is updated regularly.

KNWA

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 6:11 pm
by woodworker
I haz a bad feeling about this. I suspect a juror is arguing that Josh was framed by the investigators -- just a baaaad feeling. After all, he is such a god fearing godly man, this must all be a mistake.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 6:54 pm
by filly
woodworker wrote: Wed Dec 08, 2021 6:11 pm I haz a bad feeling about this. I suspect a juror is arguing that Josh was framed by the investigators -- just a baaaad feeling. After all, he is such a god fearing godly man, this must all be a mistake.
Based on the location of the trial? They told the judge they were deliberating, the judge told them they could stay on or come back tomorrow, they opted to come back tomorrow.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 8:10 pm
by LM K
I'm not worried. The jury wanted to hear Duggar's interview with the feds again.

The prosecuion did an excellent job laying out evidence. They did a good job impeaching the defense computer expert.

The jury is being deliberate and thorough. As they should be.

The jury will not see Duggar as a god fearing man. They were shown the child sexual abuse material (CSAM) again today. I read a lot about what was on Duggar's computer. It's haunting.

I'd rather the jury be careful so fewer appeal issues are raised.

Re: United States v. Josh Duggar

Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 8:12 pm
by Maybenaut
LM K wrote: Wed Dec 08, 2021 8:10 pm I'm not worried. The jury wanted to hear Duggar's interview with the feds again.

The prosecuion did an excellent job laying out evidence. They did a good job impeaching the defense computer expert.

The jury is being deliberate and thorough. As they should be.

The jury will not see Duggar as a god fearing man. They were shown the child sexual abuse material (CSAM) again today. I read a lot about what was on Duggar's computer. It's haunting.

I'd rather the jury be careful so fewer appeal issues are raised.
There is very little the jury could do during deliberations that would result in an appealable issue.