Fogbow

Kendra wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:50 pm https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/ ... 3684252672

► Show Spoiler

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 4:12 pm

Kendra wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:50 pm https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/ ... 3684252672

Here's the rest of the letter "IMEACH BIDEN" came from if you are interested in reading it.

You're not. You're not interested in reading it. You're going to have to trust me on this one.

► Show Spoiler

Kendra wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 4:29 pm

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 4:12 pm

Kendra wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:50 pm https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/ ... 3684252672

Here's the rest of the letter "IMEACH BIDEN" came from if you are interested in reading it.

You're not. You're not interested in reading it. You're going to have to trust me on this one.

► Show Spoiler

tl;dr

Suranis wrote: ↑Fri Oct 01, 2021 5:04 pm meach; intransitive verb

To skulk; to cower

So it's "I Meach Biden!"

That makes no sense...

Dear Attorney General Garland,

I am alarmed by your decision to weaponize the Department of Justice (DOJ) against concerned parents, exercising their First
Amendment rights, who dare to oppose the teaching of critical race theory, a repulsive and racist ideology, in their children’s schools.
This policy change appears to be in response to a letter from the National School Boards Association that claimed American public
schools are under “threat” from law-abiding parents and compared some of their actions to a form of “domestic terrorism.” Parents
have absolutely every right to express their opinions at public school board meetings concerning their children’s education. The DOJ’s
October 4, 2021, press release indicated your office is in possession of new data concerning “an increase in harassment, intimidation,
and threats of violence against school board members, teachers, and workers in our nation’s public schools.”1
I ask you to provide my
office a copy of this information by November 1, 2021, and all the data from previous years that can corroborate this claim. Please
compile and provide a list of any political appointees who had a part in crafting and implementing this policy decision as well as any
career staffers who made substantive policy edits to the October 4, 2021, memo.2

The October 4th DOJ press release also states that “the Justice Department will also create specialized training and guidance for local
school boards and school administration…on how to capture and preserve evidence of threatening conduct to aid in the investigation
and prosecution of these crimes.” The implied ‘crime’ being expressing their frustrations about mask mandates and critical race theory
which conveniently run counter to this regime’s agenda. This bureaucratic policy change was never agreed to by Congress and is no
small thing. It is organizing the tremendous power of the federal government against law-abiding parents.

Also of concern, numerous media organizations have reported that your son-in-law, Xan Tanner, the owner of Panorama Education, is
potentially benefiting from this new propaganda operation. PanoramaEd, a Boston-based company backed by Mark Zuckerberg,
received $1.8 million in “emergency” COVID funds through a contract with Fairfax County Public Schools to conduct “social and
emotional learning” screening and allow them to conduct “psychometrics” on the school system’s 180,000 students.3 PanoramaEd’s
website states that it teaches “social and emotional learning (SEL)” and “culturally responsive training” which are deeply rooted in
teaching equity programs and critical race theory. These are the exact policies and programs that are causing parents to protest at
school board meetings. While your family is personally benefiting from the exact kind of propaganda these parents are protesting, you
are using your immense power as Attorney General to stifle their First Amendment rights. Your actions are unconstitutional, and you
should have recused yourself from this matter given the clear conflict of interest. Accordingly, I ask that you provide a copy of your
recusal list, a copy of your signed ethics pledge, and any documents submitted to the DOJ Departmental Ethics Office during your
onboarding or tenure to include any conflicts of interests and communications in which you disclosed your personal and familial
relationships with the DOJ by November 1, 2021.

Sincerely,

Lauren Boebert
Member of Congress

Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 1:35 pm Is he expected to respond or can he just toss it in the trash?

Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 15, 2021 2:05 pm Such a serious person with serious(ly ridiculous) ideas.