#AZAudit Maricopa & Other Arizona County Election Audits - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Pulitzer / Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

User avatar
Chilidog
Posts: 1951
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:36 pm

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2451

Post by Chilidog »

Doug fired himself.




Response from Cyber Ninjas' Doug Logan's spokesperson when I asked why his attorney referred to him as 'former CEO' in court this morning.

"All employees have been let go and the company is being closed."
User avatar
LM K
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:44 pm
Location: Oregon
Occupation: Professor Shrinky Lady, brainwashing young adults daily!
Contact:

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2452

Post by LM K »

:rotflmao:
"The jungle is no place for a cellist."
From "Take the Money and Run"
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5701
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2453

Post by Luke »

Wonder how Dougie's depo went yesterday?
Thursday, December 16, 2021
BREAKING: Cyber Ninjas' Doug Logan To Be Deposed In Election "Audit"/Public Records Lawsuit, Judge Adds CNI As Party
The election "audit" masterminds received a hard one-two combination today in the State Senate's ongoing battle to not turn over public records related to the process. Plaintiff American Oversight noticed out the deposition of head Cyber Ninja Doug Logan, for January 5. And, the judge also added Cyber Ninjas as a defendant in the lawsuit. Logan will be videotaped for the deposition, although he does not need to come back to Phoenix for it.

And, Superior Court Judge Michael Kemp agreed with attorneys for both AO and the State Senate that Cyber Ninjas should be added to the lawsuit as a real party in interest. This traces back to the apparent rift between State Senate President Karen Fann and Logan, as the parties are at risk of being held in contempt of court for not turning over key documents. Cyber Ninjas had asked to only participate in the case as an Amicus - a "friend of the court". Judge Kemp was not pleased with the attorney's (Jack Wilenchik's) request, given that he had already considered and ruled on the issues Wilenchik proposed to raise - "that records in the possession of CNI that have a substantial nexus to the audit are public records that must be
disclosed. CNI asks this Court to reverse a holding after special action relief was denied on August 19, 2021, on these same issues." Kemp notes that the Court of Appeals again denied those arguments last month, and that the Ninjas are simply an agent of the State Senate (and are thus not an independent party).
https://arizonaslaw.blogspot.com/2021/1 ... e.html?m=1

Some AZAudit porn. They don't seem thrilled with Dougie. Maybe since they got grifted?
► Show Spoiler
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 14814
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2454

Post by RTH10260 »

Question from an overseas IANAL: does US law allow a company to close and sneak away from oligations? In my corner of the world the last board of directors remains liable for anything that is pending at shutdown.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5554
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2456

Post by bob »

RTH10260 wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 6:38 pmdoes US law allow a company to close and sneak away from oligations?
The short answer is: maybe. It would depend on how the company was structured, and some essentially let the principals walk away.

I don't know the ex-Ninja's corporate structure.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
LM K
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:44 pm
Location: Oregon
Occupation: Professor Shrinky Lady, brainwashing young adults daily!
Contact:

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2457

Post by LM K »

RTH10260 wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 6:38 pm Question from an overseas IANAL: does US law allow a company to close and sneak away from oligations? In my corner of the world the last board of directors remains liable for anything that is pending at shutdown.
Judge Hannah expressed concern that this is exactly what Logan is trying to do. He is seriously pissed, and said the fines will be levied against individuals if necessary.
:snippity:
The $50,000 daily fine
imposed by Maricopa County Superior Court judge John Hannah far exceeds the $1,000 levy suggested by a lawyer for The Arizona Republic newspaper, which filed the public records lawsuit earlier this year. Hannah said the lower amount would be “grossly insufficient” to coerce Cyber Ninjas to comply with his orders.

Hannah said the $50,000 daily fine would begin accruing on Friday and warned that, if necessary, he will apply the fine to individuals, not just the Cyber Ninjas corporation.

“The court is not going to accept the assertion that Cyber Ninjas is an empty shell and that no one is responsible for seeing that it complies,” Hannah said.

He said there's been no evidence submitted showing that Cyber Ninjas is actually insolvent and noted that millions of dollars were donated to the election review. He also said the company could comply for very little cost by turning its records over to the Senate and allowing legislative lawyers to determine which must be publicly released.

Wilenchik maintains Cyber Ninjas is not subject to the Arizona public records law because it's a private company. Trial and appellate judges have disagreed, ruling that the documents must be released because the firm was performing a core government function on behalf of the Senate. The Arizona Supreme Court declined to take the case on appeal.

Wilenchik has asked to quit as the Cyber Ninjas lawyer because he hasn't been paid, but Hannah refused to approve until new local attorneys are in place to represent the firm. Two out of state lawyers, Jonathan Miller of Georgia and Mike Smith of Michigan, said they'll represent Logan as the former CEO, but Hannah said they couldn't participate in the hearing until they're given temporary approval to practice in Arizona.

Hannah's refusal to release Wilenchik prompted a tense exchange in which the lawyer said the judge has “shown an intemperate attitude towards me and my firm" and was biased against conservatives. He vowed to appeal.

A spokesman for Cyber Ninjas, Rod Thomson, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the judge's ruling.
:snippity:

Maricopa County Superior Court judge Jack Kemp on Thursday denied Wilenchik's request to withdraw from that case as well. He said he won't consider granting the request until, at a minimum, Cyber Ninjas turns over records and Logan gives a deposition.

“The Court and the public would be denied prompt and reasonable resolution of an important public matter,” Kemp wrote.
:rotflmao:
"The jungle is no place for a cellist."
From "Take the Money and Run"
User avatar
LM K
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:44 pm
Location: Oregon
Occupation: Professor Shrinky Lady, brainwashing young adults daily!
Contact:

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2458

Post by LM K »

I've been watching Seinfeld all afternoon.

I can't tell which is funnier: Seinfeld and gang, or my mental image of Logan realizing Judge Hannah means business.
"The jungle is no place for a cellist."
From "Take the Money and Run"
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5554
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2459

Post by bob »

LM K wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:18 pmI can't tell which is funnier: Seinfeld and gang, or my mental image of Logan realizing Judge Hannah means business.
The FAAFO crowd loves the FA part because they never think about the FO part.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
LM K
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:44 pm
Location: Oregon
Occupation: Professor Shrinky Lady, brainwashing young adults daily!
Contact:

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2460

Post by LM K »

bob wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:07 pm
LM K wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:18 pmI can't tell which is funnier: Seinfeld and gang, or my mental image of Logan realizing Judge Hannah means business.
The FAAFO crowd loves the FA part because they never think about the FO part.
:lol:
"The jungle is no place for a cellist."
From "Take the Money and Run"
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 18504
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2461

Post by raison de arizona »

How many Ls can a lawyer take in one day? Wilenchik asked the Arizona Supreme Court today to stay Hannah's order for sanctions. Supreme Court denied motion within hours.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9658
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2462

Post by Foggy »

This is bringing up fond memories of when Orly Taitz tried the FAAFO on Judge Land in Georgia.

For those not here, he issued an OSC for her to pay $10,000 sanctions for filing a frivolous case. Her reply (written by Charles Lincoln, a whole 'nother story) was so rude (and frivolous) that he doubled it, to $20,000.

She thought she'd just tell him to stuff it, he was in Georgia and she was in SoCal, so what could he do? She mocked him on her blog.

Then the US Attorney's Office slapped a lien on her husband's house. :shock:

One of the extremely rare occasions when she actually learned a little bit of law. :doh:
The more I learn about this planet, the more improbable it all seems. :confuzzled:
User avatar
Chilidog
Posts: 1951
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:36 pm

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2463

Post by Chilidog »

One thing that I don't get....

Why is Doug Logan SO desperate not to release the financial records of the audit?

The only conclusion that I can come up with is that there were some financial shenanigans involved that broke federal laws.

Was it garden variety cash skimming or something a bit more involved?

Money laundering, maybe?
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9658
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2464

Post by Foggy »

Whatever it is, Chilidog, I suspect he thinks the documents would put him behind bars. Or else why take such enormous risks?
The more I learn about this planet, the more improbable it all seems. :confuzzled:
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9658
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2465

Post by Foggy »

It's telling that the judge said he's seen no evidence that Cyber Ninjas is insolvent. Logan can't show ANY of the financial records, because those things have a very bad habit of leading to other financial records that you REALLY DON'T WANT ANYONE TO SEE. :o
The more I learn about this planet, the more improbable it all seems. :confuzzled:
User avatar
Dr. Ken
Posts: 2534
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:12 pm
Contact:

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2466

Post by Dr. Ken »

This is going to be funny
ImageImagePhilly Boondoggle
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 5502
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation: We build cars

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2467

Post by Gregg »

They are oh so close...
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
LM K
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:44 pm
Location: Oregon
Occupation: Professor Shrinky Lady, brainwashing young adults daily!
Contact:

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2468

Post by LM K »

Foggy wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:57 am This is bringing up fond memories of when Orly Taitz tried the FAAFO on Judge Land in Georgia.

For those not here, he issued an OSC for her to pay $10,000 sanctions for filing a frivolous case. Her reply (written by Charles Lincoln, a whole 'nother story) was so rude (and frivolous) that he doubled it, to $20,000.

She thought she'd just tell him to stuff it, he was in Georgia and she was in SoCal, so what could he do? She mocked him on her blog.

Then the US Attorney's Office slapped a lien on her husband's house. :shock:

One of the extremely rare occasions when she actually learned a little bit of law. :doh:
:rotflmao:

I missed that!!
"The jungle is no place for a cellist."
From "Take the Money and Run"
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5554
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2469

Post by bob »

Off Topic
Foggy wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:57 am This is bringing up fond memories of when Orly Taitz tried the FAAFO on Judge Land in Georgia.

For those not here, he issued an OSC for her to pay $10,000 sanctions for filing a frivolous case. Her reply (written by Charles Lincoln, a whole 'nother story) was so rude (and frivolous) that he doubled it, to $20,000.

She thought she'd just tell him to stuff it, he was in Georgia and she was in SoCal, so what could he do? She mocked him on her blog.

Then the US Attorney's Office slapped a lien on her husband's house. :shock:

One of the extremely rare occasions when she actually learned a little bit of law. :doh:
Taitz then appealed the sanctions, all the way to SCOTUS! When Thomas (the 11th Circuit's justice) denied her stay, Taitz accused SCOTUS' shipping clerks of hiding her filings from Thomas. :towel:

The saga ended when Taitz ... just paid the sanctions. :violin:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
LM K
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:44 pm
Location: Oregon
Occupation: Professor Shrinky Lady, brainwashing young adults daily!
Contact:

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2470

Post by LM K »

Chilidog wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:05 am One thing that I don't get....

Why is Doug Logan SO desperate not to release the financial records of the audit?

The only conclusion that I can come up with is that there were some financial shenanigans involved that broke federal laws.

Was it garden variety cash skimming or something a bit more involved?

Money laundering, maybe?
State AND federal government folks who do not want to be linked to the fraudit. I really want to see the emails between Logan and federal officials. Imo, Logan has been pressured to fight any attempts by others to see those records.
"The jungle is no place for a cellist."
From "Take the Money and Run"
Jim
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:46 pm

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2471

Post by Jim »

Dr. Ken wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:49 am This is going to be funny
So the Trump sheeple want their wool back?
woodworker
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:58 am
Location: San Mateo, Calif
Occupation: Slave to my cats

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2472

Post by woodworker »

bob wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 5:15 pm
Phoenix520 wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 2:06 pmI’m surprised he didn’t let the lawyer who isn’t being paid off the hook. Is this tough love, you made your bed treatment from the judge or to be expected?
No; change of lawyers means delay (and delay always favors a defendant). The opposing party and even the courts have an interest in resolving cases, so a client playing fire-the-latest-lawyer can't game the system.

And the lawyer is presumed to have entered the case with eyes wide open, knowing the possibility could occur. Nobody ordered this lawyer to accept this case.

Especially when the lawyer was an active participant in the antics to create delay by raising frivolous arguments. :violin:
And he shouldn't get paid for filing/making frivolous arguments -- call it self sanctioning.
woodworker
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:58 am
Location: San Mateo, Calif
Occupation: Slave to my cats

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2473

Post by woodworker »

Chilidog wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 5:30 pm Doug fired himself.




Response from Cyber Ninjas' Doug Logan's spokesperson when I asked why his attorney referred to him as 'former CEO' in court this morning.

"All employees have been let go and the company is being closed."
Gee, I sure hope he made sure that the corporate veil can't be pierced and he be personally liable for debts. Given how shoddy the CN work was, I would not be at all surprised to find out they it did not comply with the requirements to be a true separate legal entity. That would be so sad.
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 14814
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2474

Post by RTH10260 »

Foggy wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:10 am It's telling that the judge said he's seen no evidence that Cyber Ninjas is insolvent. Logan can't show ANY of the financial records, because those things have a very bad habit of leading to other financial records that you REALLY DON'T WANT ANYONE TO SEE. :o
because ... he didn't pay his accountant and they stopped working for him.

Similar I guess that his former staffers quit and the documents that ought to be written never made an appearance, a total no-show, and a now-show one cannot present to AZ legislators or a court :think:
woodworker
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:58 am
Location: San Mateo, Calif
Occupation: Slave to my cats

Re: #AZAudit Maricopa Arizona Election Audit - #CyberNinjas / Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Karen Fann / Birther Ken Bennett

#2475

Post by woodworker »

RTH10260 wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 6:38 pm Question from an overseas IANAL: does US law allow a company to close and sneak away from oligations? In my corner of the world the last board of directors remains liable for anything that is pending at shutdown.
To expand on another poster's answer above, it is generally extremely easy for shareholders, directors and officers to walk away and leave creditors with little or nothing. That is one of the primary, if not the primary, reason why corporations, LLC/s, etc. exist -- to provide liability protection for a company's shareholders, directors and officers, as long as they follow certain rules.

In our system (USA), the corporation is a completely separate legal entity and its assets and obligations do not track through to shareholders, directors or officers as long as that separate legal identity is maintained. This means, for example, separate bank accounts, no commingling of funds -- THE COMPANY'S MONEY IS THE COMPANY'S MONEY, NOT YOUR PERSONAL CHECKING ACCOUNT, all transactions with related parties are fair and reasonable to the company, the company was adequately capitalized and the directors and officers did whatever due diligence was required in making business decisions and business decisions were made with the best interests of the company being the paramount concern, i.e., the business judgment rule (this is a brief summary).

If these corporate formalities are not followed, a court may "pierce the corporate veil," meaning the company, shareholders, directors and officers lose the protection provided by the company being a separate legal entity and may now be personally liable. This is also referred to the company being the alter-ego of the shareholders, et al, and not truly being a separate entity.

Having said all that, IMO, probably 99% of corporate failures do not result in personal liability.

As to why Logan doesn't want to disclose:

1. CN allegedly raised/was paid in excess of $5,000,000. I can't see any way they legitimately spent that much on the fraudit: Even if they had 50 people reviewing for 40 hours a week, paying $25 an hour for ten weeks, that only comes out to $1 million (not counting CN's share of Social Security, etc. which I doubt they actually paid to the IRS, et al). And I know they didn't have 50 people working their full time and I suspect that many of them were "righteous" volunteers. That leaves over $4 million and even with the cabin in Montana (IIRC), their expensive consultants and their bullshit technical analysis, I just don't see them spending that much legitimately on the fraudit.

2. But I am confident that they spent a lot of fraudit money on other items, expensive lunches and dinners, expensive hotel rooms, new electronic equipment for themselves, "jobs" for family and friends, payoffs, sorry, contributions, to Fann/Rogers/etc., automobile rentals/leases, first class travel. It is amazing how much you can spend for dinner (which must include expensive wines, cognac and cigars) for a party of six at a place like Mortons (eons ago I was being recruited to be general counsel for a start up and witnessed exactly this before saying no). LOGAN CANNOT AFFORD TO LET THOSE TYPES OF EXPENSES BE EXPOSED -- it would help to pierce the corporate veil resulting in Logan being personally on the hook.

3. As I said above, I suspect that CN did not withhold Social Security and other required amounts (those are supposed to be paid throughout the year, not just at the end of the year), so disclosing any such failure could result in criminal charges.

4. Payments to politicians/officials (or their relatives/friends) for no-show jobs might be viewed as bribery, again criminal charges.

5. Payments to oneself (or one's relatives/friends expecting the payments to be partially kicked back) could be viewed as fraud against the company and IF (a big if) a court were to appoint a receiver for the company, the company could sue/file charges against the offending person.

SUMMARY: Logan might be in very deep shit. And that would be so sad.
Post Reply

Return to “"Forensic Audits" of State Elections 2020”