Re: Squidney Sidney Katherine Powell - Born May 1, 1955
Posted: Wed May 05, 2021 9:41 am
link with possibly spotty information about what voting machines are certified and in actual use: https://secureourvote.us/certifiedmachines/
Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
https://thefogbow.com/forum/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Voting_SystemsIn a related hoax, Dennis Montgomery, a software designer with a history of making dubious claims,[55] asserted that a government supercomputer program was used to switch votes from Trump to Biden on voting machines.[55] Trump attorney Sidney Powell promoted the allegations on Lou Dobbs's Fox Business program two days after the election, and again two days later on Maria Bartiromo's program, claiming to have "evidence that that is exactly what happened." Christopher Krebs, the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, characterized the claim as "nonsense" and a "hoax."[55][56] Asserting that Krebs's analysis was "highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud," Trump fired him by tweet days later.[57]
orlylicious wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 2:04 pm IIRC from the Opposition to Squidney's MTD, Dominion stated they were in 1,600 jurisdictions. They were also in 1,600 jurisdictions in 2016. Are Trumpers planning to audit those results too also?
Dominion 2020.JPG
Hey, Dennis Montgomery made it in the Wikipedia Dominion entry!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Voting_SystemsIn a related hoax, Dennis Montgomery, a software designer with a history of making dubious claims,[55] asserted that a government supercomputer program was used to switch votes from Trump to Biden on voting machines.[55] Trump attorney Sidney Powell promoted the allegations on Lou Dobbs's Fox Business program two days after the election, and again two days later on Maria Bartiromo's program, claiming to have "evidence that that is exactly what happened." Christopher Krebs, the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, characterized the claim as "nonsense" and a "hoax."[55][56] Asserting that Krebs's analysis was "highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud," Trump fired him by tweet days later.[57]
Only if I huff a lot of spray paint first...woodworker wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 5:20 pm
Of course not. What happened in 2016 is that JEAEZUSS came down and personally rewrote all of the algorithms that Soros and the communist socialist fascist demoncrat femnazi gaymafia jewish-controlled cabal had installed to make sure the killary won. I mean, that makes much more sense, amirite?
So, when she writes her book about this whole thing, Dominion will be able to sue and be given the copyright and all royalties for the book, in the same way that OJ Simpson's book was given to his wife's family.fierceredpanda wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 7:20 am I've been trying to imaging playing the tape on this lawsuit (and for Sidney Powell generally) to the end. Trying and failing, actually. I can't think of a settlement that would actually do what Dominion requires that would be acceptable to Powell unless she has vastly more money than she appears. Unless I'm very mistaken, an apology (a la Newsmax) is not going to be sufficient to get her off the hook, even if she were smart and sane enough to seize such an opportunity - which, judging from the appearance with D'Souza, she plainly is not. But the endgame of her practice being put under and her personal finances being permanently obliterated seems like a possibility that to which she is utterly oblivious.
Thank you, woodworker, I had mot learnt about some of the conspiracies you mentioned.Frater I*I wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 5:52 pmOnly if I huff a lot of spray paint first...woodworker wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 5:20 pm
Of course not. What happened in 2016 is that JEAEZUSS came down and personally rewrote all of the algorithms that Soros and the communist socialist fascist demoncrat femnazi gaymafia jewish-controlled cabal had installed to make sure the killary won. I mean, that makes much more sense, amirite?
woodworker wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 5:20 pm Of course not. What happened in 2016 is that JEAEZUSS came down and personally rewrote all of the algorithms that Soros and the communist socialist fascist demoncrat femnazi gaymafia jewish-controlled cabal had installed to make sure the killary won. I mean, that makes much more sense, amirite?
He was on vacation with Jeffrey Epstein.noblepa wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 11:49 amwoodworker wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 5:20 pm Of course not. What happened in 2016 is that JEAEZUSS came down and personally rewrote all of the algorithms that Soros and the communist socialist fascist demoncrat femnazi gaymafia jewish-controlled cabal had installed to make sure the killary won. I mean, that makes much more sense, amirite?
So, what happened in 2020? Did JEAEZUSS abandon the orangester?
WaPo published a long piece yesterday about the Arizona nonsense. No mention of Sidney, though.
Seems like a weak defense since she was the one pushing the falsehoods most publicly at the time. Now she wants to cry foul?Uninformed wrote: ↑Tue May 25, 2021 2:56 pm “Sidney Powell says Dominion's $1.3 billion lawsuit unfairly singles her out from everyone who pushed election falsehoods”:
https://www.businessinsider.com/sidney- ... her-2021-5
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 9.40.0.pdf
This was our defense when growing up. BUT MY BROTHERS WERE DOING IT TOO! The response was always, "Well you got caught."
That argument is patently false. Dominion is also suing Rudy Giuliani. Are the suing Fox News, as well, or is that someone else? Anyway, she and Rudy were arguably, by far, the two most prominent voices shouting the big lie on national television.Uninformed wrote: ↑Tue May 25, 2021 2:56 pm “Sidney Powell says Dominion's $1.3 billion lawsuit unfairly singles her out from everyone who pushed election falsehoods”:
https://www.businessinsider.com/sidney- ... her-2021-5
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 9.40.0.pdf
They are suing Fox News ($1.6 billion) -- but doubt it was reported on their network (We report, you decide -- yeah right)
I'm trying to parse this into something that makes sense in my head...Uninformed wrote: ↑Tue May 25, 2021 2:56 pm “Sidney Powell says Dominion's $1.3 billion lawsuit unfairly singles her out from everyone who pushed election falsehoods”:
https://www.businessinsider.com/sidney- ... her-2021-5
So... basically people who published the fact that Sydney said the election was a fraud Etc should be sued? And what was the point of adding on the "supported by..." bit at the end. Are they saying that the Sydney crapfest was true? Since multiple judges ruled that evidence was frivolous and has no probitive value, aren't they opening themselves up to perjury or contempt charges?The attorneys' Monday-night filing, meant to bolster a motion to dismiss the case, argued that Dominion didn't have the standing to sue Powell.
...
Powell's attorneys, Lawrence J. Joseph and Howard Kleinhendler, said in the filing that Dominion's lawsuit was unfair because the company didn't also sue everyone else who supported Powell's lawsuits.
"Plaintiffs concede that as a public figure they must establish that Ms. Powell — the only human among defendants capable of uttering defamatory statements — acted with malice. Thus, if this Court somehow finds jurisdiction, this case must be dismissed," they wrote. "Nowhere in U.S. jurisprudence has a court found someone liable for defamation for publishing the basis of claims in four federal lawsuits supported by a combination of over 170 separate affidavits, declarations, and expert reports."