Fogbow

Chilidog wrote: ↑Sat Mar 20, 2021 1:11 pm Any info on this case?

Genetski v. Benson

The right wingers are yapping about it.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-CV-162

JEREMY BRAVO, LINDSEY
NGUYEN, “P.P.”, AND “D.D.,” FOR
THEMSELVES AND AS CLASS
REPRESENTATIVES,
Plaintiffs.

v.

NANCY PELOSI, MITCH
McCONNELL, CHUCK SCHUMER,
MARK ZUCKERBERG, BRAD
RAFFENSPERGER, ALL
MEMBERS OF THE 117TH U.S.
CONGRESS, ALL 50 STATE
GOVERNORS AND SECRETARIES
OF STATE, JACK DORSEY, MIKE
PODHORZER, PETE SESSIONS,
DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL
CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE,
DEMOCRATIC SENATE
CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE,
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL
COMMITTEE,
Defendants.

There is a substantial likelihood that Plaintiffs will prevail on the merits of their claims

It is self-evident that...

It is self-evident that...

sterngard friegen wrote: ↑Fri Mar 26, 2021 10:50 pm The Georgia Legislature was probably tempted to pass a bill stating that each POC who voted only had 40% of the vote of a White person, but they knew that such a law would only get them 4 favorable votes at SCOTUS: Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas and Barrett.

sterngard friegen wrote: ↑Fri Mar 26, 2021 10:50 pm The Georgia Legislature was probably tempted to pass a bill stating that each POC who voted only had 40% of the vote of a White person, but they knew that such a law would only get them 4 favorable votes at SCOTUS: Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas and Barrett.

A Minnesota attorney who filed legal challenges to the November election of five congressional Democrats was given a $10,000 sanction Friday after a judge found she “bamboozled” voters into signing on as plaintiffs without their knowledge or permission.

“Susan Shogren Smith … perpetrated a fraud against this court and, more importantly, perpetrated a fraud against these plaintiffs,” Ramsey County Chief District Judge Leonardo Castro said from the bench.

Shogren Smith is a member of the MN Election Integrity Team, a conservative group that sought to prevent the state from certifying its election results while President Donald Trump and his allies promoted unfounded claims of election fraud.



Shogren Smith acknowledged she never spoke with the plaintiffs or informed them of the outcome of the case, even when Braun and two other unwitting plaintiffs were ordered to pay $3,873 to the defendants at the conclusion of the case.

Volkonski wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:55 pm TRAPEZOID OF DISCOVERY
@get_innocuous
·
23m
Weird, seems like that was removed. Trying again: https://gofile.io/d/7Bmeg4 (if anyone knows of reliable, free anonymous file hosting, let me know)

03/01/2021 SUMMONS Not Issued as to JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR, KAMALA DEVI HARRIS, NANCY PATRICIA PELOSI, JOHN GLOVER ROBERTS, JR., ROBERT M. WILKINSON (znmw) (Entered: 03/17/2021)

BREAKING: Law Firms Now Threatening to Sue the Auditors Selected by the Arizona Senate Who Just Want to Determine the Accuracy of the Election Results in Maricopa County
By Joe Hoft Published April 6, 2021 at 7:50pm

The circus never ends in Arizona as now law firms are threatening suits against the auditors selected by the Arizona Senate to audit the questionable results in Maricopa County from the 2020 Election. here really must be some bad stuff lingering in the results of the 2020 Election in Maricopa County because the Democrats and the county’s Board of Supervisors are doing everything they can to prevent an adequate audit of the results in the county. News12 in Phoenix reported this morning:

Arizona Senate Republicans’ plans to recount Maricopa County’s 2020 presidential vote face a new legal challenge.

In a letter emailed Tuesday to the Senate’s hired auditors, attorneys for the non-profit voting-rights group Protect Democracy and three Phoenix firms warn that the auditors’ plan to knock on doors to search for voters likely violates state and federal law.

The lawyers say lawsuits could follow if the audit proceeds as planned.

“These tactics – no matter their intent – constitute illegal voter intimidation and might expose your companies to both civil and criminal penalties,” according to the letter to the four firms working on the audit.

Of course, the results in the county are questionable. Joe Biden was the first Democrat to win the county in 72 years. This makes no sense since Biden and Harris couldn’t even fill a few circles at a joint event before the November election. President Trump, however, held massive rallies in the state before the election.

The Democrats are doing all they can to stop the audit in the county for months. They sued the Senate. They took the Senate to Court. They forced the Senate to update the law to address crazy accusations by the county. They selected their own auditors to audit the county, claiming they were certified when they were not.

These auditors did a superficial if not a horrible job. Then when the Senate decides to go with their own auditors, the County Board of Supervisors unilaterally loaded the ballots up on a truck and drove them around the city. This was likely totally illegal. One thing is clear – the Democrat Party, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, and now some legal firms are doing all they can to prevent an accurate counting of legitimate ballots in the county.

noblepa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 2:35 pm SCOTUS declines to hear PA lawsuit.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/19/politics ... index.html

Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:07 pm

noblepa wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 2:35 pm SCOTUS declines to hear PA lawsuit.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/19/politics ... index.html

They avoided the central issue of whether the governor could extend the voting times due to the pandemic by calling the suit moot.