Sovcit nutz

These people are weird, but we like to find out what weird people are doing and thinking. It's a hobby.
Post Reply
User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1223
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Sovcit nutz

#1

Post by scirreeve »

I don't see a place to post about random sovcit nutz here. If there is please delete this Foggy.

Anyway, this one from Trent is special.
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG (87.15 KiB) Viewed 8984 times


Dave from down under
Posts: 1883
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
Location: Down here!

Re: Sovcit nutz

#2

Post by Dave from down under »

:crazy:


User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 4885
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: TOP SECRET Fogbow HQ
Occupation:: muttering and puttering

Re: Sovcit nutz

#3

Post by Foggy »

Sounds like somebody dropped LSD and watched Monsters, Inc. :stars:


We are NOT going back! - Nancy Pelosi
Mood: deciduous
User avatar
Flatpoint High
Posts: 463
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:58 am
Location: Hotel California, PH523, Galaxy Central, M103
Occupation:: professional pain in the ass, voice actor & keeper of the straight face

Re: Sovcit nutz

#4

Post by Flatpoint High »



castigat ridendo mores. oh, and
VELOCIUS QUAM ASPARAGI COQUANTUR
User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1223
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Re: Sovcit nutz

#5

Post by scirreeve »

Florida sovcit gets his window busted a bit after 2 minutes into this video. The dude narrating it is kind of funny.


woodworker
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:58 am

Re: Sovcit nutz

#6

Post by woodworker »

scirreeve wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 12:47 am I don't see a place to post about random sovcit nutz here. If there is please delete this Foggy.

Anyway, this one from Trent is special.
Capture.JPG
Wasn't this sort of how the monster world was originally powered in Monsters, Inc.?


arayder
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:00 am

Re: Sovcit nutz

#7

Post by arayder »

scirreeve wrote: Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:33 am Florida sovcit gets his window busted a bit after 2 minutes into this video. The dude narrating it is kind of funny.
It's the sovcit/freeman/poot fantasy meeting reality.

Upon becoming "woke" the individual imagines he can free himself from all that car insurance-driver's license-auto registration-traffic laws-parking fees tyranny that is oppressing him.

We see the shock and rage upon seeing that fantasy so throughly trashed.


Wanderinglord
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:31 pm

Re: Sovcit nutz

#8

Post by Wanderinglord »

Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/larry-nas ... ons-watch/


Knowledge is power, power corrupts. Study hard be evil.
User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1223
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Re: Sovcit nutz

#9

Post by scirreeve »

Wanderinglord wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:56 am Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/larry-nas ... ons-watch/
Ha Ha - that is the Apple Bistro pretend attorney (Placerville CA). I love the Van Balion channel.
https://www.mtdemocrat.com/news/2-cafes ... -licenses/


User avatar
p0rtia
Posts: 2234
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:55 am

Re: Sovcit nutz

#10

Post by p0rtia »

Thanks for that, scireeve! :bighug:


Uninformed
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

Re: Sovcit nutz

#11

Post by Uninformed »

Wanderinglord wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:56 am Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
So refreshing to see a judge not entertaining any nonsense whatsoever from one of these loons. Hopefully some of the other deluded wannabe “lawyers” and their prospective, possibly pro se, “clients” will see the video.


If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
bob
Posts: 2659
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Sovcit nutz

#12

Post by bob »

Uninformed wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:43 am
Wanderinglord wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:56 am Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
So refreshing to see a judge not entertaining any nonsense whatsoever from one of these loons. Hopefully some of the other deluded wannabe “lawyers” and their prospective, possibly pro se, “clients” will see the video.
The response is inevitably, "Of course they failed; they didn't say the correct magick words. Which I will teach you, for three easy payment installments...."


Image ImageImage
Dave from down under
Posts: 1883
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
Location: Down here!

Re: Sovcit nutz

#13

Post by Dave from down under »

Another elected LEO who is dangerous

https://coloradotimesrecorder.com/2021/ ... ist/35340/


User avatar
Lani
Posts: 1962
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:42 am

Re: Sovcit nutz

#14

Post by Lani »

Dave from down under wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 2:04 am Another elected LEO who is dangerous

https://coloradotimesrecorder.com/2021/ ... ist/35340/
And look who shows up in the article - "... Kris Ann Hall, who peddles a conspiracy theory that most of the federal government is unconstitutional and therefore its laws can be ignored."


Image You can't wait until life isn't hard anymore before you decide to be happy.
Uninformed
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

Re: Sovcit nutz

#15

Post by Uninformed »

From the above quoted article:
“ CORRECTION 3/25/2021 — The phrases “sovereign citizens” and “sovereign citizens” were changed to “sovereign being” and “sovereign beings.”

Anybody aware of the difference between sovereign “citizens” and “beings”? An attempt avoid the bad reputation of “sovereign citizens”?


If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
fierceredpanda
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:11 pm
Location: BAR Headquarters - Turn left at the portrait of George III
Occupation:: Criminal defense attorney. I am not your lawyer. My posts != legal advice.

Re: Sovcit nutz

#16

Post by fierceredpanda »

It was at the end of one of these perfectly reasonable responses, in this case to a man who was insisting the Supreme Court’s Marbury v. Madison ruling gives all Americans the right to ignore laws they don’t like, that Reams called state Rep. Leslie Herod (D-Denver) a “terrorist.”
I did a double-take at this, because I am much more accustomed to SovCits and their ilk arguing that Marbury v. Madison usurped the constitutional order and must be overturned, because it arrogated power to the Judiciary not granted in the Constitution. I know Roy Moore wrote opinions to that effect when he was on the bench. And you can kind of (just barely) see the faintest semblance of a point there, because John Marshall did kind of invent the notion of judicial review, until you remember that there'd be no fucking point to having a Judicial Branch at all if they didn't have some means to interpret the Constitution and tell the other two branches what it means.

On the other hand, this guy's reading of Marbury is just entertaining, and I encourage him to try it in court sometime, preferably where there are cameras.

:popcorn:


"There's no play here. There's no angle. There's no champagne room. I'm not a miracle worker, I'm a janitor. The math on this is simple. The smaller the mess, the easier it is for me to clean up." -Michael Clayton
User avatar
noblepa
Posts: 1417
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
Location: Bay Village, Ohio
Occupation:: Retired IT Nerd

Re: Sovcit nutz

#17

Post by noblepa »

Uninformed wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 7:07 am From the above quoted article:
“ CORRECTION 3/25/2021 — The phrases “sovereign citizens” and “sovereign citizens” were changed to “sovereign being” and “sovereign beings.”

Anybody aware of the difference between sovereign “citizens” and “beings”? An attempt avoid the bad reputation of “sovereign citizens”?
Some sovcits argue that the phrase "sovereign citizen" is an oxymoron. If you're a citizen, you are, by definition, not sovereign. That is why some insist that they are not sovereign citizens, all the while screaming "I do not consent" and proclaiming that laws don't apply to them. They're not objecting to the "sovereign" part, but rather the "citizen" part.

Many sovcits also claim to have renounced their US citizenship. Of course, they claim that, as non-citizens, the laws don't apply to them.


Uninformed
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

Re: Sovcit nutz

#18

Post by Uninformed »

If only they would also see the “oxy” is redundant.


If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
noblepa
Posts: 1417
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
Location: Bay Village, Ohio
Occupation:: Retired IT Nerd

Re: Sovcit nutz

#19

Post by noblepa »

fierceredpanda wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 7:27 am
It was at the end of one of these perfectly reasonable responses, in this case to a man who was insisting the Supreme Court’s Marbury v. Madison ruling gives all Americans the right to ignore laws they don’t like, that Reams called state Rep. Leslie Herod (D-Denver) a “terrorist.”
I did a double-take at this, because I am much more accustomed to SovCits and their ilk arguing that Marbury v. Madison usurped the constitutional order and must be overturned, because it arrogated power to the Judiciary not granted in the Constitution. I know Roy Moore wrote opinions to that effect when he was on the bench. And you can kind of (just barely) see the faintest semblance of a point there, because John Marshall did kind of invent the notion of judicial review, until you remember that there'd be no fucking point to having a Judicial Branch at all if they didn't have some means to interpret the Constitution and tell the other two branches what it means.

On the other hand, this guy's reading of Marbury is just entertaining, and I encourage him to try it in court sometime, preferably where there are cameras.

:popcorn:
I believe that Marshall's reasoning was something like this. The Constitution states that it is the supreme law of the land. If further provides a process for amending the document, when the need arises. This process is distinctly different from the process to pass an ordinary statute. Therefore, Congress can not amend the Constitution by ordinary statute.

If Congress passes a law that is contrary to the Constitution, and that law were allowed to stand, that statute would, effectively, be an amendment to the Constitution, even though it did not go through the prescribed process for amendments.

Therefore, any law that is contrary to the Constitution is no law. If the court were not allowed to overturn a law as unconstitutional, then Congress could and would run roughshod over the Constitution, passing all kinds of things that exceed the authority granted to them by that document.

On a practical level, the notion of Judicial Review has worked remarkably well for 230 years, keeping Congress in check and not allowing them to exceed their authority. It is not perfect, and reasonable people can disagree (without being disagreeable, to quote Ronald Reagan) over a particular decision, but, all in all, the process works pretty well.

The sovcits are the first to agree that a law that is contrary to the Constitution is no law, ab initio, to use one of their favorite latin phrases. Where they go wrong is that they think that they, themselves, get to decide that a law is unconstitutional. In our system, right or wrong, it is the court system, particularly the Supreme Court that makes that determination. I can have an opinion about whether a law is constitutional or not, but my opinion carries no legal weight. If SCOTUS says a law is constitutional, then it IS constitutional.


User avatar
p0rtia
Posts: 2234
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:55 am

Re: Sovcit nutz

#20

Post by p0rtia »

bob wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:58 pm
Uninformed wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:43 am
Wanderinglord wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:56 am Not sure where this belongs but here seems appropriate. Love the judge wish they were all like her
So refreshing to see a judge not entertaining any nonsense whatsoever from one of these loons. Hopefully some of the other deluded wannabe “lawyers” and their prospective, possibly pro se, “clients” will see the video.
The response is inevitably, "Of course they failed; they didn't say the correct magick words. Which I will teach you, for three easy payment installments...."
No true SovCit would say the wrong magick wordz.


User avatar
northland10
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation:: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst

Re: Sovcit nutz

#21

Post by northland10 »

p0rtia wrote: Fri Mar 26, 2021 10:27 am
bob wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:58 pm
Uninformed wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:43 am
So refreshing to see a judge not entertaining any nonsense whatsoever from one of these loons. Hopefully some of the other deluded wannabe “lawyers” and their prospective, possibly pro se, “clients” will see the video.
The response is inevitably, "Of course they failed; they didn't say the correct magick words. Which I will teach you, for three easy payment installments...."
No true SovCit would say the wrong magick wordz.
And yet, they must be because they keep losing when they try them. It's a :pickle:

When you hear a window smash, it means another SovCit got their wings.

Attempting to find consistency in SovCit claims is likely finding empathy in Trump. It just ain't there. That's because all of the claims, ideology, and magic words are based on 2 core beliefs:

1. Nobody can tell me what to do.
2. Everybody is out to get me.


Baidn
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:43 am

Re: Sovcit nutz

#22

Post by Baidn »

If anybody likes watching breakdowns of the more dedicated sovcits I'd recommend watching Arty's corporate fiction on YouTube. There's a couple really good ones with Trent starting with him losing his shit in the comments it's great :p


"...don't teach a man to fish. He's a grown man and fishings not that hard." Ron Swanson the worlds only good libertarian
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 3328
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation:: We build cars

Re: Sovcit nutz

#23

Post by Gregg »

crossing the Rio Grande


Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1223
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Re: Sovcit nutz

#24

Post by scirreeve »

Big pile of stoopid at this NH site.
https://cosnh.com/


User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1223
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Re: Sovcit nutz

#25

Post by scirreeve »

Thought this might be parody but looked at his page and NOPE. Total nutter. Might not be a sovcit so maybe wrong thread but whatever. Found it while looking at Flatcap stuff.
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG (37.22 KiB) Viewed 8234 times


Post Reply

Return to “Other weirdos”