Spring forward.
To delete this message, click the X at top right.

The dregs of birther remainders.

These people are weird, but we like to find out what weird people are doing and thinking. It's a hobby.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#976

Post by bob »

Reality Check (in August 2022) wrote: Wed Aug 10, 2022 8:48 pm How could we have missed commemorating the 10 year anniversary of little Scottie chickening out of the debate with Frank Arduini? My how time flies. :lol:
P&E comment:
Scott Erlandson wrote: i crossed paths with Mario (Apuzzo)
Political Forum
He and Arduini were mortal enemies.
Corsi called me about Frank aka wong kim ark, epi etc.
fogbow hacked my
digital backstage

got me in dutch with
Apuzzo…

he was banned..
so was i

it’s all dna & genetic
geneolgy from here.

my money is on Subuh.

malik’s chroms are half the answer..

i just notified the Trumps..

vindication is at hand..
:eek:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#977

Post by bob »

Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#978

Post by realist »

bob wrote: Thu Apr 20, 2023 3:59 pm P&E: Natural Born Citizen – Key Birth Status Definition, SCOTUS Fact Findings, and SCOTUS Holdings.

Executive summary: Kerchner; :yankyank: .

:yawn:
:roll:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 2177
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:46 pm
Verified: ✅ Curmudgeon
Contact:

The dregs of birther remainders.

#979

Post by Reality Check »

Something I see in the Birther articles at the P&E on natural born citizen is that they like to invoke "natural law". It is no coincidence that the same "natural law" arguments were used by Southerners in support of slavery from 1820-1861. I have been watching a series of lectures on the Civil War given at Yale University by Professor David Blight.

Professor Blight mentions the natural law argument for slavery. One of the Southern arguments for slavery was that it was natural that the Negro should be subservient to the white man. It was part of the natural order of society. He quotes the Vice President of the Confederacy Alexander Stephens who in 1861 said:
Our new Government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and moral condition. [Applause.] This, our new Government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth
The fools at the P&E see the same inequality in American citizens. The believe natural born citizens (by their own flawed definition) are a better class of citizen and more purely American than plain citizens. Rondeau on her About page goes out of her way to point out that both she and John Charlton, the mysterious founder of the P&E, are both "natural born citizens". Of course this designation means nothing unless one chooses to run for president.

The convenience of the natural law argument is that it means whatever you want it to mean. It is "natural" you know with the implication that it is God given.

User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#980

Post by bob »

To be slightly fair, natural law was en vogue with Enlightenment era philosophers, who sought universal truths.

But, yes, natural law typically is used to justify the status quo. It is easy, for example, to proclaim natural law prohibits stealing if you are the one with stuff that could be stolen.

And I lurve when birthers proclaim natural born citizens are those who are citizens without reliance on positive law. As if the U.S. Constitution and the Treaty of Paris have always existed in nature.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

The dregs of birther remainders.

#981

Post by northland10 »

At least evattel/dancingrabbit/draggingcanoe was very honest with his Natural Kind argument as it related to NBC. He was racist and proud of it.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
MN-Skeptic
Posts: 3000
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
Location: Twin Cities

The dregs of birther remainders.

#982

Post by MN-Skeptic »

bob wrote: Sat Apr 22, 2023 12:00 pm But, yes, natural law typically is used to justify the status quo. It is easy, for example, to proclaim natural law prohibits stealing if you are the one with stuff that could be stolen.
Off Topic
My sister is friends with a woman from Uganda. There aren't public high schools in Uganda, so my sister's friend has created a private high school in order to educate her children and others. She would like to build a girls' dormitory. The problem, though, exists when you buy materials and can't build yet. If the materials just sit there, other people will come and take them. It is a requirement in their society to share if your are able. So why do you have material lying around when your neighbors have needs? It ends up that a building, then, gets built in stages. You get material, guard that material, and quickly get it put up.
User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 2177
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:46 pm
Verified: ✅ Curmudgeon
Contact:

The dregs of birther remainders.

#983

Post by Reality Check »

bob wrote: Sat Apr 22, 2023 12:00 pm To be slightly fair, natural law was en vogue with Enlightenment era philosophers, who sought universal truths.
:snippity:
Yes, I think the writings of John Locke were used in support of slavery in the South.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#984

Post by bob »

Reality Check wrote: Sat Apr 22, 2023 1:23 pm Yes, I think the writings of John Locke were used in support of slavery in the South.
Yes; exactly.

Another canard is that natural born citizenship came from the Romans.

Which begs the question raises the issue: where did they get it from? Was it floating down a river in a reed basinet?
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9554
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

The dregs of birther remainders.

#985

Post by Foggy »

Natural born citizenship has to be totally natural, not man-made at all.

Only God can create a natural born citizen.

But each one must be born within the artificial, totally un-natural borders of a man-made political subdivision of the land on the planet. At the border, only a few inches can determine the citizenship of a newborn child. The natural thing to do is to move the baby a foot or two across the border before anybody figgers it out, n'est ce pas?

:confuzzled:
Out from under. :thumbsup:
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 6693
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#986

Post by pipistrelle »

User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#987

Post by bob »

P&E: Bill O’Reilly on His Current ‘No Spin News’ Show Says He ‘Put That Birther Thing Right Out The Window’ on His 12 Apr 2011 ‘The Factor’ Show on Fox News:
Kerchner wrote:The recent show in which he said that was ‘Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News’ hosted by Bill O’Reilly. It first aired on Thursday 20 Apr 2023 and was re-aired on Saturday 22 Apr 2023.

* * *

A little more than half way into the show, O’Reilly started discussing statements made by Maureen Dowd in her recent column in the NY Times about the “racist birthers”. And as part of discussing the NY Times and Dowd’s column, O’Reilly made his statement about “that birther thing” starting at about 26 minutes 25 seconds into the show.

* * *

I personally sent information to him back in Apr 2011 when he first made that claim on his show The Factor on the Fox News Network. And likewise today when his Thursday show was re-aired, and when I heard what he said and he aired that segment from his Fox New show during his The First TV network show, I immediately sent him a tweet disputing his statement of the veracity of the usefulness of those two newspaper ads to prove anything about Obama’s early life narrative and included a link to a suggested narrative to explain to him how those newspaper ads were not dispositive in proving Obama was physically born in Hawaii.

* * *

As in the past, I suspect Bill O’Reilly will totally ignore any evidence as to the lack of usefulness of those two newspaper ads to conclusively prove that Obama was physically born in Hawaii since it disputes his personal mindset on the issue and the partial and limited fact finding effort he expressed on air on the Fox News show The Factor back on 12 Apr 2011. . . .

I wonder if Mr. O’Reilly realizes now what he allowed to happen to our country when to use his wording “he helped throw the true meaning and original national security intent and purpose of the ‘natural born Citizen‘ term in the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution out the window” too.

* * *
Kerchner wrote:[Reilly]’s employed now by a conservative news channel named “The First” TV, not NewsMax. He could have been employed by NewsMax at one time but now he is with The First TV streaming TV news and talk show network. One can get The First network on the KlowdTV streaming service. KlowdTV also carries One America News and NewsMax and the Salem News Network.

I don’t watch O’Reilly at all on a regular basis. In fact I watch him very rarely. I no longer respect or trust him given what he did to Constitutionalists wanting to openly and fairly discuss the “natural born Citizen” issue and true meaning in our U.S. Constitution back in the 2008 and 2012 election cycles. Anyone challenging Obama’s eligibility on either the place of his alleged birth or that Obama’s father was a foreigner and not a U.S. Citizen, were promptly labeled as birthers and all discussion then focused solely on the birth location and birth certificate question.

* * *

I like to watch another show on The First network named the Jesse Kelly show. In surfing the various news channels on KlowdTV, I just happened to be channel surfing and stumbled on The First channel exactly when O’Reilly was on the air and at that instant I heard him talking about the “racist birthers” remark by Maureen Dowd so I paused there and listened to what he was saying. I then heard him make that bragging remark about him putting the birthers right out the window back in 2011. I then listened to the podcast of that whole show segment. And the rest is history as they say. I wrote to O’Reilly my opinion of him saying what he did once again about his putting out the window the birther argument in 2011, and I also wrote my blog post.
TL;DR: Kerchner yells at clouds about O'Reilly; loses.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#988

Post by bob »

P&E: The LLPAM Nightmare:
'DeMaio' wrote:"SOCIALISM AT WORK"

["Who cares?" :snippity: .]

This plan – scheduled to go into effect May 1, 2023 – sets the stage for another housing bubble implosion as occurred in 2008, when the Second Usurper in Chief (“SUC”), Barack Hussein Obama, was in charge. . . .

Stated otherwise, it is madness with a new face: instead of a “clean, articulate black man” overseeing the 2008 disaster . . . .
This "scholar" obsessed with Obama doesn't even know when he was inaugurated.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#989

Post by realist »

bob wrote: Mon Apr 24, 2023 2:18 pm P&E: The LLPAM Nightmare:
'DeMaio' wrote:"SOCIALISM AT WORK"

["Who cares?" :snippity: .]

This plan – scheduled to go into effect May 1, 2023 – sets the stage for another housing bubble implosion as occurred in 2008, when the Second Usurper in Chief (“SUC”), Barack Hussein Obama, was in charge. . . .

Stated otherwise, it is madness with a new face: instead of a “clean, articulate black man” overseeing the 2008 disaster . . . .
This "scholar" obsessed with Obama doesn't even know when he was inaugurated.
And where was he on 9/11?? Why wasn't he at the White House?

:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5589
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

The dregs of birther remainders.

#990

Post by Luke »

Bob bringing up John Charlton a few days ago made me wonder -- is that "DeMaio"? It's still hard to imagine anyone would be so stupid as to keep writing pages and pages of fantasy. Did we ever hear what happened to Charlton? Enquiring minds want to know. Not really.

Meanwhile, one of the idiots on my Twitter Clowns list is digging up 2011 birfing. But poor Coco isn't getting any traction. She's right -- Forget the debt ceiling, this is the ideal thing for Kevin McCarthy to focus on right now!
💫💥CoCo Say's‼️
@cocoknows8
Appeals court rebuffs man seeking Obama birth certificate https://staradvertiser.com/2011/04/07/b ... rtificate/ via @

Another article from 2011.
So many red flags about this
And nothing but a cover up!

Knowing what we know now!
It needs investigated.
@SpeakerMcCarthy
So many ideas to suggest to Coco. Maybe that this should be Tucker's first big story when he joins OAN :lol: Links to a 2011 Star Advertiser story about a birther being rebuffed. Really breaking news today :dance:
Appeals court rebuffs man seeking Obama birth certificate
By Star-Advertiser staff April 7, 2011

The state appeals court affirmed this morning the denial of a request to inspect and review President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. In a 3-0 vote, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals upheld a 2009 ruling by then-state Circuit Judge Eden Elizabeth Hifo, who dismissed the lawsuit by a man identified as “Dr. Robert V. Justice,” who represented himself. He listed a Beverly Hills, Calif., address on his court papers.

In his legal brief to the appeals court, Justice wrote the inspection of the birth certificate will “ensure the health and safety of all 300 million of us by making sure that our military and our nuclear and chemical arsenals are still under our control and not in the control of any one of our enemies.” The appeals court said Justice sought the review under the state open-records law requiring the disclosure of documents based on a showing of “compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of any individual.”

But the court said the provision relates to access to records in “medical or safety emergency situations.” Birth certificates are confidential under state law, except to certain people, such as relatives, who have a “direct and tangible interest” in the records. Justice had written a letter dated Dec. 31, 2008, to the state Health Department seeking to inspect the birth certificate to “allow me and other fellow Americans to determine whether or not Mr. Obama is eligible to hold the Office of President,” the appeals court said.

After the department denied his request, Justice filed the lawsuit seeking a court order directing the department to disclose the birth certificate. Chief Judge Craig Nakamura of the appeals court wrote the 17-page opinion. Appeals Judge Katherine Leonard wrote a concurring opinion.
https://www.staradvertiser.com/2011/04/ ... rtificate/

ETA: Just had to reply to give Coco the support she deserves. The GOP should STOP EVERYTHING and pursue this.


Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#991

Post by realist »

SC2B69~1.PNG
SC2B69~1.PNG (22.8 KiB) Viewed 545 times
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#992

Post by bob »

P&E: Redux: Vattel – Law of Nations Vol. 1 Chapter III § 30.* Of the Support of the Constitution and Obedience to the Laws:
Kerchner wrote:The disregard of the rule of law and the abrogation of the true original-intent meaning and purpose of a key term in our U.S. Constitution the supreme law of our land as to whom can be the President and Commander in Chief of our military (and VP) has led to a very serious crisis in our nation with a cognitively challenged puppet in the Oval Office on a part-time basis and the rest of his time in a basement in Delaware with a culturally anti-American usurper who was unconstitutionally elected and sworn in twice still pulling the strings, making the decisions, and giving the orders behind the scenes in effect in a 3rd term, leading from behind as the “National Community Organizer in Chief (NCOinC), i.e., Obama....

The 2024 election will decide whether we still have a constitutional republic and a constitution that is the supreme law of the land and that it is enforced, or if we will totally lose it all forever.
It seems like every election is when we'll lose the republic ("forever"). :confuzzled:


*
Vattel wrote:The constitution and laws of a state are the basis of the public tranquility, the firmest support of political authority, and a security for the liberty of the citizens. But this constitution is a vain phantom, and the best laws are useless, if they be not religiously observed: the nation ought then to watch very attentively, in order to render them equally respected by those who govern, and by the people destined to obey. To attack the constitution of the state and to violate its laws, is a capital crime against society; and if those guilty of it are invested with authority, they add to this crime a perfidious abuse of the power with which they are intrusted. The nation ought constantly to repress them with its utmost vigor and vigilance, as the importance of the case requires. It is very uncommon to see the laws and constitution of a state openly and boldly opposed: it is against silent and gradual attacks that a nation ought to be particularly on its guard. Sudden revolutions strike the imaginations of men: they are detailed in history; their secret springs are developed. But we overlook the changes that insensibly happen by a long train of steps that are but slightly marked. It would be rendering nations an important service to show from history how many states have thus entirely changed their nature, and lost their original constitution. This would awaken the attention of mankind: — impressed thenceforward with this excellent maxim (no less essential in politics than in morals) principiis obsta, — they would no longer shut their eyes against innovations, which, though inconsiderable in themselves, may serve as steps to mount to higher and more pernicious enterprises.
:yawn:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#993

Post by realist »

bob wrote: Thu Apr 27, 2023 4:15 pm P&E: Redux: Vattel – Law of Nations Vol. 1 Chapter III § 30.* Of the Support of the Constitution and Obedience to the Laws:
Kerchner wrote:The disregard of the rule of law and the abrogation of the true original-intent meaning and purpose of a key term in our U.S. Constitution the supreme law of our land as to whom can be the President and Commander in Chief of our military (and VP) has led to a very serious crisis in our nation with a cognitively challenged puppet in the Oval Office on a part-time basis and the rest of his time in a basement in Delaware with a culturally anti-American usurper who was unconstitutionally elected and sworn in twice still pulling the strings, making the decisions, and giving the orders behind the scenes in effect in a 3rd term, leading from behind as the “National Community Organizer in Chief (NCOinC), i.e., Obama....

The 2024 election will decide whether we still have a constitutional republic and a constitution that is the supreme law of the land and that it is enforced, or if we will totally lose it all forever.
It seems like every election is when we'll lose the republic ("forever"). :confuzzled:


*
Vattel wrote:The constitution and laws of a state are the basis of the public tranquility, the firmest support of political authority, and a security for the liberty of the citizens. But this constitution is a vain phantom, and the best laws are useless, if they be not religiously observed: the nation ought then to watch very attentively, in order to render them equally respected by those who govern, and by the people destined to obey. To attack the constitution of the state and to violate its laws, is a capital crime against society; and if those guilty of it are invested with authority, they add to this crime a perfidious abuse of the power with which they are intrusted. The nation ought constantly to repress them with its utmost vigor and vigilance, as the importance of the case requires. It is very uncommon to see the laws and constitution of a state openly and boldly opposed: it is against silent and gradual attacks that a nation ought to be particularly on its guard. Sudden revolutions strike the imaginations of men: they are detailed in history; their secret springs are developed. But we overlook the changes that insensibly happen by a long train of steps that are but slightly marked. It would be rendering nations an important service to show from history how many states have thus entirely changed their nature, and lost their original constitution. This would awaken the attention of mankind: — impressed thenceforward with this excellent maxim (no less essential in politics than in morals) principiis obsta, — they would no longer shut their eyes against innovations, which, though inconsiderable in themselves, may serve as steps to mount to higher and more pernicious enterprises.
:yawn:
I don't know why it's taken me this long, but I finally figured out that to me Kerchner's schtick and style and BS is very much like if not identical Wal-Mart Wally from Ed Hale's days. :lol:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#994

Post by bob »

P&E: The Heritage Guide to the Constitution:
'DeMaio' wrote:The Heritage Foundation some time ago published “The Heritage Guide to the Constitution.” It was (and continues to be) billed as being “intended to provide a brief and accurate explanation of each clause of the Constitution as envisioned by the Framers and as applied in contemporary law” and in a “clear and understandable” format.

Far be it from your humble servant to criticize products of one of the leading conservative think tanks in the world and one which is recognized as “among the most influential public policy organizations in the United States.”
:yankyank:
But when an organization of that gravitas and stature makes errors, they should be identified and corrected. Such is the goal of this offering.

["DeMaio" :yankyank: [the same ole same ole] :snippity: ]

Indeed, the “explanation” appended to the constitutional provision was authored by attorney James C. Ho, at that time a partner at the D.C. mega-firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.

Now, Judge Ho serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, having been appointed by President Trump. He is no doubt of high intellect and well serves the citizens within the Fifth Circuit. But with utmost respect, his explanation of the meaning of the Eligibility Clause is flawed.
Fake DeMaio knows better than a sitting conservative judge!
Adding insult to injury, for some inexplicable reason, Mr. Ho never mentions Emer de Vattel or his treatise . . . .
:rotflmao:

Ho's explainer takes the conventional view, i.e., natural-born citizen is a citizen at birth.
Accordingly, the Heritage Foundation should revisit the “explanation” authored by James Ho when he was in private practice. Otherwise, Heritage readers could leap to the unfortunate conclusion that it was taking clues from the CRS on how to address, rather than obfuscate, the natural born Citizen issue.
So thoughtful of "DeMaio" to catalog everyone who disagrees with him.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#995

Post by realist »

Amazing how everyone except these keyboard jurists is wrong.

:brickwallsmall: :brickwallsmall: :brickwallsmall:

He should write and ‘splain to the Heritage Foundation and Judge Ho how they are wrong and DEMAND they correct their errors.
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5589
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

The dregs of birther remainders.

#996

Post by Luke »

Dammit, heads must to be rolled! DeMaio has discovered that James C. Ho and Heritage Foundation were secret Obama supporters and OBOTS who still are gaslighting birthers. Another Win for DeMaio and Chuckles: Birthers 1- Federal Judge & Heritage Foundation 0. Not full panic yet, but very concerned that DeMaio has published this fresh, new blockbuster information to the huge audience of The P&E. Checked Google News to see if it's been picked up yet but so far no. Thank goodness he published on a Sunday.

Orlytoon.JPG
Orlytoon.JPG (14.65 KiB) Viewed 403 times
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

The dregs of birther remainders.

#997

Post by northland10 »

northland10 wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 9:45 am At least some things in life are constant, like Paul Maas Risenhoover suing lots of people.

In our previous episode, from Formerly Fogbow.
Northland10 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:24 pm
So, I was browsing the DC federal court opinions, and note the name Risenhoover. Now there's a name I have not heard in a while. Seems Paul Maas Risenhoover filed a case in DC (and application for IFP) against various defendants. The court was confused about what he was requesting, and apparently the complaint named defendants in Taiwan (he is also from Taiwan).

It was dismissed.
Just recently, he be denied again by that evil Klayman-hating leftist judge. He should sue her. It has worked so well for GIL.

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sh ... 2cv2869-16
Have you forgotten about Risenhoover? I'm pretty sure the DC District would like to.

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sh ... 23cv1033-5
Plaintiff, a resident of Taiwan, suesthe United States Secretary of Education. The rambling prolix complaint totals 85 pages, and is supported by 360 pages of supplements, ECF Nos. 4–6, all of which were filed without the court’s leave. The complaint and it supplements, taken together or separately, are mostly incomprehensible. The allegations are vague, amalgamated, and confused, and the pleading vacillates between myriad unrelated topics, including, but not limited to plaintiff’s: pursuit of transcript copies from the University of Oklahoma; demand that all of his student loans should be declared “null and void;” work as a translator for the “United States Military Government Formosa, or its delegates, or subordinate entities;” interest in “monetize[ing]” certain “words, including by lease to Google, META, Microsoft, ChatGPT,..... :blahblah: :blahblah: :blahblah: :crazy:
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sh ... 23cv1033-5
Plaintiff, a resident of Taiwan, sues the United States Secretaries of State and Commerce. The complaint is disorganized, rambling, and almost entirely incomprehensible. The allegations themselves are vague, amalgamated, and confused, and the pleading vacillates between myriad unrelated topics, including, but not limited to: ophthalmology, “brain-control weaponry,” and “invisible Mind reading Thoughts Medical network,” “coerced organ or bodily tissue transplantation,” “harmful or deadly ‘directed energy’ or EM electromagnetic systems by foreign entities,” “Havana Syndrome,” and “paranormal experiences or capabilities.”
:snippity:
Plaintiff also demands that this court “[r]econsider all decisions dismissed for purportedly fanciful claims and inadequate proffers of evidence, as the more than 800 redacted pages alone demonstrate the general Government of the United States take ‘brain control weaponry’ under Chinese development to be a serious national security and foreign affairs matter” and then “send certified copies of the Order [granting such] Relief to all Clerks, of information, nationwide, and to the Clerks of the superior command responsibility Court in this District, and her sister Appellate Circuits nationwide, and also of information, to the Honorable, the Chief Justice of the United States, and his Associate Justices, and their Clerk.”
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

Foggy, can we have a crazy emoji with the other arm so we can use both? My arm is getting sore from just one side.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Ben-Prime
Posts: 2599
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:29 pm
Location: Worldwide Availability
Occupation: Managing People Who Manage Machines
Verified: ✅MamaSaysI'mBonaFide

The dregs of birther remainders.

#998

Post by Ben-Prime »

northland10 wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 9:47 pm
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

Foggy, can we have a crazy emoji with the other arm so we can use both? My arm is getting sore from just one side.
Just read it in a mirror. Duh.
But the sunshine aye shall light the sky,
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.

- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#999

Post by bob »

P&E: Natural Born Citizen:
Harold Gielow wrote:Rumor is that the Kennedy campaign is considering Tulsi Gabbard as a VP. Mrs. Gabbard is a very attractive choice with one exception – she is constitutionally unqualified.

* * *

I do not expect to win any accolades for highlighting this issue. To the contrary, most who do are ridiculed; however, there is more than substantial evidence that the meaning of this phrase is very restrictive and contrary to the many contemporary interpretations. The following is offered to highlight the original meaning of this phrase, or at least disputes as to its meanings. The Kennedy campaign should consider this issue, especially since it seeks to be viewed as upholders of the law.
The is the usual birther nothing, like you've heard before.

I have no idea where Gielow heard that Kennedy was eying Gabbard as a running mate.

But, sure, birthers: Please go bother Kennedy. :yawn:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5589
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1000

Post by Luke »

Foggy, do something!

We OBOTS are taking massive blows this week at the Post & Email! Now it's Tom Arnold (Obots should never have let Roseanne divorce him):
The Handwriting is on the Wall
4 hours ago by Tom Arnold

(May 3, 2023) —It reads, “AND YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE.” The “wall” is located inside the foyer of the Central Intelligence Agency’s original headquarters building in Langley. The words, a popular motto of the CIA (taken from the Holy Bible, John 8:32), are etched as if handwritten on the wall.

*** Examples of tough-to-swallow facts like: KENNEDY ASSASSINATION, NOVEMBER 22, 1963. Was Lee Harvey Oswald the “lone gunman?” Maybe, maybe not. Did Oswald have connections with the CIA? The indications are that he most certainly did & BENGHAZI!!!!!! Already started to sweat... and then: ***

CIA RECRUITED OBAMA AT COLLEGE IN 1980 & GROOMED HIM FOR YEARS TO BE A MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE. OBAMA WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT IN 2008. Does this seem contrary to the CIA’s handwritten motto on the wall? In my opinion, this one conspiracy committed by the CIA is quite likely the greatest and most dangerous crime ever committed against our country’s national security. Although it was, and still is, a matter of some controversy, many (including me) believe that Obama was not a Natural Born American Citizen as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution. He also had a troublesome and convoluted background, which appears to have included citizenship in and allegiance to three different countries; only one biological parent who was a U.S. citizen (his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham); mentoring by Communists and Muslims; missing or counterfeited personal documents including a Hawaiian “birth certificate” conclusively proved by experts to be a forgery; an appearance and behaviors typifying an Arab-American as opposed to a Black or African-American; a criminal past including a variety of serious crimes such as perjury, Social Security fraud, identity fraud, backdating of a Selective Service form (military draft card); unlawful drug crimes; habitual and indiscriminate sexual behavior with other men; election fraud; sedition and treason. THE CIA KNEW ALL OF THIS, AS DID SOME IN THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, THE “DEEP STATE,” NEW WORLD ORDER, SOME REPUBLICANS WHO LOOKED THE OTHER WAY AND WERE COMPLICIT BY THEIR SILENCE IN THE COVER-UP, THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND CHIEF JUSTICE, THE NATIONAL NEWS MEDIA, AND OTHERS.

For some reason, the CIA’s alleged knowledge of and involvement in all of this seemed to make no difference to anyone. Obama announced that he would “fundamentally change” America. That, my friends and future Komrades, is the moment in 2008-09 when the downfall of America began. Things have only gotten worse since then. Just look around you. What you see is essentially a SOCIETY IMITATING the ideologies and behaviors of Barack and Michelle Obama. Some call it “WOKE.” Others, though, are informed enough to see that it actually is RACISM; HATE; EQUITY, NOT EQUALITY; WEAPONIZATION OF POLITICS; GODLESSNESS AND A LOT MORE. I therefore ask you: WHAT WAS THE CIA THINKING? I believe I know, but I would like for you to answer that question for yourselves. Maybe the below extraordinarily researched and written material will be helpful:

https://covertactionmagazine.com/tag/obama/

***
In conclusion, what can be done about all of this? Why doesn’t our government or, for that matter, anyone else talk openly and unafraid about the CIA? Do you not agree that many of the things which the Agency has been doing since its inception in 1947 have been harmful to our country? The worst of them all was the identification early on and the preparation for years of a Manchurian Candidate who would eventually become our president and commander-in-chief. I BELIEVE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA WAS THAT TRAITOR. THE CIA PLAYED A DELIBERATE, UNFORGIVABLE, AND HUGE ROLE IN THE WEAKENING AND COMING DESTRUCTION OF OUR ONCE-GREAT CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

God Bless America and help us save what our wise and brave Founding Fathers fought and died for. They were not the same people you see today on the streets of America or comfortably occupying our seat of government. Amen.
https://www.thepostemail.com/2023/05/03 ... -the-wall/

It's been "coming" for soooo long. But this might be it! For real this time! So please, do something -- to involve the 699th would bring so much death and destruction, there will be tons of collateral damage. Of course, we have all P&E commenters home addresses, SSNs, financial statements and passwords from Operation Barnyard Backdoor, but a stern discussion with Sharon could save many lives.
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
Post Reply

Return to “Other weirdos”