Spring forward.
To delete this message, click the X at top right.

The dregs of birther remainders.

These people are weird, but we like to find out what weird people are doing and thinking. It's a hobby.
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1001

Post by realist »

She was born in American Samoa, so unless there's been some decision I've missed, she's not a U.S. citizen by birth.

SCOTUS refused to take up a case in which the court held they are not U.S. citizens by birth.
A Federal Judge in Utah held that they are.

Federal judge rules American Samoans are US citizens by birth
“This court is not imposing ‘citizenship by judicial fiat.’ The action is required by the mandate of the Fourteenth Amendment as construed and applied by Supreme Court precedent,” wrote Judge Clark Waddoups in the US District Court for the District of Utah.

“Further, Plaintiffs are American Samoans. They brought this action seeking to realize their rights to citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment,” he added. It’s unclear whether Waddoups’ order applies to American Samoans beyond Utah.

"In 2016, the Supreme Court declined to reconsider a ruling in a similar case from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that the Constitution does not confer citizenship on those born in American Samoa.

"American Samoa has been a US territory since 1900. Those born in the other US territories – Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and the Northern Marianas – all get citizenship at birth, but that was determined by statute in Congress. No such law exists for American Samoa.
gavel photo

READ: Federal court ruling on US citizenship for American Samoans https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/12/politics ... index.html

'American Samoans living in Utah brought the suit in 2018, arguing that being “non-citizen nationals,” instead of US citizens closed the door to some employment opportunities and didn’t allow them to vote, among other rights afforded to US citizens"

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/12/politics ... index.html
Only her mother was a U.S. citizen at Tulsi's birth, not her dad.

So the birthers have a good case here. :biggrin:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1002

Post by bob »

realist wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 6:37 pm She was born in American Samoa, so unless there's been some decision I've missed, she's not a U.S. citizen by birth.
Both of Gabbard's parents were U.S. citizens when she was born.

Gabbard has a better claim than Cruz.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1003

Post by realist »

bob wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 6:41 pm
realist wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 6:37 pm She was born in American Samoa, so unless there's been some decision I've missed, she's not a U.S. citizen by birth.
Both of Gabbard's parents were U.S. citizens when she was born.
Only because of his dad's U.S. citizenship. You know full well both parents need to be NBC AND he was born on American Soma, so quite the legal cunundrum there.

Even worse than not being NBC for Tulsi is that she's Hindu. :fingerwag:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1004

Post by bob »

P&E: The “Natural Born Citizen” Term is Neither Confusing, Ambiguous, Sexist, Racist, or Overly Restrictive if One’s Mind is Open to the Truth and Not Pettifogging on the Term:
Kerchner wrote:All the sundry political problems created by the modern Progressive Movement as to nbC’s true meaning would dissipate if we just simply stay true to the laws of nature and Natural Law for that key term in the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution. It is only men of dubious reasoning and political objectives who attempt to redefine a Natural Law term in ways to suit their current agenda that cause the ambiguity that leads to these divisive sexism and racism charges.
Irony meters exploding everywhere.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1005

Post by realist »

bob wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 12:27 pm P&E: The “Natural Born Citizen” Term is Neither Confusing, Ambiguous, Sexist, Racist, or Overly Restrictive if One’s Mind is Open to the Truth and Not Pettifogging on the Term:
Kerchner wrote:All the sundry political problems created by the modern Progressive Movement as to nbC’s true meaning would dissipate if we just simply stay true to the laws of nature and Natural Law for that key term in the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution. It is only men of dubious reasoning and political objectives who attempt to redefine a Natural Law term in ways to suit their current agenda that cause the ambiguity that leads to these divisive sexism and racism charges.
Irony meters exploding everywhere.
Indeed.
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 2177
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:46 pm
Verified: ✅ Curmudgeon
Contact:

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1006

Post by Reality Check »

bob wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 12:27 pm P&E: The “Natural Born Citizen” Term is Neither Confusing, Ambiguous, Sexist, Racist, or Overly Restrictive if One’s Mind is Open to the Truth and Not Pettifogging on the Term:
Kerchner wrote:All the sundry political problems created by the modern Progressive Movement as to nbC’s true meaning would dissipate if we just simply stay true to the laws of nature and Natural Law for that key term in the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution. It is only men of dubious reasoning and political objectives who attempt to redefine a Natural Law term in ways to suit their current agenda that cause the ambiguity that leads to these divisive sexism and racism charges.
Irony meters exploding everywhere.
I suppose the definition that "Anyone born on US soil who is not the child of parent(s) who are foreign ambassadors or members of an invading army are natural born citizens of the Untied States" is too complicated for racist pinheads like Kerchner to understand?
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1007

Post by bob »

P&E: Ramaswamy: “Deep Understanding of the Constitution”:
In an interview on “Fox & Friends” Sunday morning, 2024 Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy said he is approaching his campaign with a “deep understanding of the Constitution.”

* * *

After Ramaswamy declared himself a candidate in late February on the now-defunct “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” a number of readers as well as this writer contacted him through his campaign website to ask if and when his parents, who immigrated from India prior to his birth, were naturalized U.S. citizens and if so, their date of naturalization. To our knowledge, none received a response.
Ramaswamy won't get the coveted birther endorsement if continues to ignore all three of them.
While many Americans, legal scholars and Congress itself say the term “natural born Citizen” signifies “born in the United States” with no reference to the citizenship of a person’s parents, many others believe the term, which the Framers never defined, requires not only a presidential candidate to have been born in the United States, but also to parents who were U.S. citizens at the time of the birth to ensure the candidate’s sole allegiance to the nation.
"Many others." :roll:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9554
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1008

Post by Foggy »

Poor ol' rooster: Alexa, were both your parents United States citizens on the day you were born?

Alexa: Sorry, I'm not sure.
Whoa. :talktothehand:

You don't even know if your parents were citizens on the day you were born?

What does it say on your birth certificate? (Birth certificates don't show the citizenship of the parents.)

Jeez, were you even born on US territory ( :mrgreen:)?

(Born on US territory is a category. The Marianas Islands (named after the influential Spanish queen Mariana of Austria) are US territory.)
Poor ol' rooster: Alexa, I think maybe you need to have a talk with Commander Charles Kerchner.

Alexa: I couldn't find that name in your phone contacts. :shock: Do you have that person's phone number?

Poor ol' rooster: No.

Alexa: OK. You can always add it to your phone.
Oh, that'll be the day. :nope: :talktothehand:
Out from under. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5589
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1009

Post by Luke »

I keep hoping that an adopted person runs so we can watch their heads explode trying to figure it out. :P

Is anybody here adopted? Maybe it's time to run a Fogbow candidate, the platform is the forum slogan :boxing:
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9554
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1010

Post by Foggy »

orlylicious wrote: Mon May 08, 2023 1:41 am Is anybody here adopted?
Yes, Slim and Slarti and I don't know who else.

And my boys.

They have birth certificates that list us as the parents, and we were American citizens before their birth. I don't know what the law is, if'n anyone wanted to know about their birth parents, but I think it would be very difficult for a birther to learn even the names of their birth parents, much less their citizenship status.

Those birth certificates are the only ones on record with the state of California.

:think:
Out from under. :thumbsup:
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1011

Post by bob »

P&E: The LoC Kissing Cousin to the Heritage Guide:
In addition to the Heritage Foundation’s digital “Guide to the Constitution,” recently discussed by your humble servant here, a “kissing cousin” to that think tank’s explanation exists. Specifically, the U.S. Library of Congress (“LoC”) maintains a similar website purporting to “explain” what the Eligibility Clause of Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution means and how the term “natural born Citizen” (“nbC”) equates – purportedly – to a “citizen at birth” or a “citizen by birth.”*
The rest is just vintage "DeMaio," i.e., rambling, convoluted, too enamored with itself, etc. :yawn: E.g.:
Indeed, evidence exists that the “British East Africa Protectorate of Kenya” – note, faithful P&E readers, that country did not become “Kenya” until after its independence from Great Britain in 1964…, ahem, three years after the 1961 date shown on Barack Obama’s purported original “birth certificate” – made such a claim with regard to Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. That claim he seemingly ratified when he asserted in a speech in Nairobi, Kenya that he was “the first Kenyan-American president.” No doubt he would claim that the quip was made in jest. Not funny. And as court litigators would say: an admission against interest.
Nothing, like you've seen before.

Here's some fine handwaving:
Moreover, the two Supreme Court cases cited in the Clement/Katyal article – and picked up by the LoC – are Smith v. Alabama and Wisconsin v. Pelican Ins. Co. Smith is cited for the Court’s statement that British common law applied to the interpretation and construction of terms in the Constitution . . . .

Concededly, Smith says what it says.
DeMaio just ignores SCOTUS when it doesn't follow his beliefs. :towel:

I did like this bit:
Moreover, the LoC work arrogantly hypothesizes that the Framers likely “would have agreed” with that conclusion.
Oh, the irony: birther lurve to put words into the Framers' mouths.


* "For completeness," the Library of Congress:
While the Constitution does not define natural born Citizen, commentators have opined that the Framers would have understood the term to mean someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time.
Said commentators include Clement and Katyal, when they opined Cruz was a natural-born citizen.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1012

Post by bob »

P&E: Transparency Requirements for Candidates for President and Vice-President – More Is Needed in Our Modern Electoral Process – Filing The (OGE) Financial Disclosure Form 278e Is Mandatory – The (OPM) National Security Questionnaire Form SF-86 Should Also Be Mandatory:
Kerchner wrote:An Open Letter to All Members of Congress and to All Presidential Candidates

* * *

From my experience and from the experience of others who have contacted me with questions about various candidates, several of the candidates are not being responsive to this author and others when sent questions regarding their full life narrative, background, and family history. Their tactic seems to be to just ignore such questions from a voter and not answer other than to put the questioner’s email address immediately onto the solicitations for donations email list. They will keep ignoring certain questions unless it is asked of them by a persistent major media reporter. And for certain candidates, certain questions never seem to be asked of them by anyone in the major mainstream media.
Birther whines that candidates ignore birthers' stupid questions. :violin:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1013

Post by bob »

P&E comment:
'DeMaio' wrote:The commenter cherry-picks minutiae out of the main post, but conspicuously avoids any reference to the core issues. So your humble servant will ask the commenter:

(1) Does the commenter posit that the Founders selected as their preferred bulwark against the insinuation of foreign influence into the presidency the lower barrier of “citizen at/by birth” without reference to both parents’ citizenship or the place of nativity instead of adopting the much higher, de Vattel § 212 natural born Citizen barrier? A simple “yes” or “no” response is requested.

(2) As for the Heritage/Clement/Katyal “one-U.S.-parent-is-good-enough” theory rendering a child born “beyond sea” a “natural born Citizen,” does the commenter posit that the “other parent” — a mother or particularly a father, or the other parent’s country — lack the power to claim the child as its own citizen or, at minimum, as its dual citizen? A simple “yes” or “no” response is requested.

(3) Does the commenter contend that 1 Stat. 103 (1790), repealed by 1 Stat. 414 (1795), still today (2023) properly informs the analysis of what the Founders intended when they adopted the “natural born Citizen” criterion in the Constitution? A simple “yes” or “no” response is requested.

Failing the requested “yes” or “no” responses by the commenter to these three simple questions, your humble servant will draw the conclusion that the commenter does not fully understand plain English.
:yankyank:

"DeMaio": The new king of comment-section camping. :towel:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Greatgrey
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:53 am
Location: Unimatrix Zero
Verified: 💲8️⃣

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1014

Post by Greatgrey »

What's the Frequency, Kenneth?
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5589
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1015

Post by Luke »

Remember how we were all hoping Bill Barr was going to invite Orly Taitz into the DOJ based upon her flying monkeys demanding it? We wanted to see Orly's SF-86. :lol:

Not bothering to post at Rharon's, but I'd ask Chuckles to share Trump's SF-86 or his "concerned letters" to him demanding his SF-86. Obviously, to Chuckles, all 350 million Americans should each be able to ask for specific information and get immediate answers. Just askin'.

"DeMaio's" whole life is "cherry-picking minutiae out of main posts". Hope he self-reflected and laughed at how ironic that is. Thomas Polhaus's post was much better. But, of course, the most important question to "DeMaio" is: Is he still boycotting Coca-Cola and all Coke products including Dr. Pepper? Do we need to run through that again to be sure he wasn't just saying it and is not secretly back on the Pepper? :P


Jeff is a dipshit.
Hawaii/Statehood granted
August 21, 1959
Hawaii was made a territory in 1900, and Dole became its first governor. Racial attitudes and party politics in the United States deferred statehood until a bipartisan compromise linked Hawaii's status to Alaska, and both became states in 1959.
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 2177
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:46 pm
Verified: ✅ Curmudgeon
Contact:

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1016

Post by Reality Check »

bob wrote: Tue May 09, 2023 2:40 pm P&E comment:
:snippity:
"DeMaio": The new king of comment-section camping. :towel:
I am still amused that DeMaio as an esteemed author at that shit stain of a blog cannot lower himself to actually encounter other commenters but instead emails his comments to Sharon who dutifully publishes them for him.
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9554
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1017

Post by Foggy »

Yesterday's verdict has to be a blow to the last few pathetic birthers still out there in Nonsenseland. Trump was the birther who got elected president, and he was coming back next year, and he was going to finally spill the truth about Barack Obama, that his father wasn't a United States citizen on the day little Barack II was born.

Has anyone ever even suggested that his father was an American citizen in 1961? :nope:

But this was going to shock the world, and now what?

Trump = liar and sexual predator, as determined by a jury
Obama = told the truth that his dad wasn't a citizen

:think:

Oh man, this makes it even tougher.
Out from under. :thumbsup:
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1018

Post by northland10 »

Obama: tan suit.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 1833
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:19 pm

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1019

Post by Sam the Centipede »

Foggy wrote: Wed May 10, 2023 12:59 pm Yesterday's verdict has to be a blow to the last few pathetic birthers still out there in Nonsenseland.
Your optimism is optimistic.

For them, the verdict definitely proves something something Obama something something Biden something something treason!
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1020

Post by bob »

I can't be bothered to copy over every "DeMaio" comment, but this snippet caught my eye:
DeMaio wrote:[If] the commenter is willing to accept stupidity and a denial of reality in the courts and by “most legal authorities,” then he also probably thinks that the sun rises in the east (when actually, as the Earth rotates about its axis, the eastern horizon dips, making the sun only appear to be rising)… and he voted for Brandon in 2020.
This is classic "DeMaio": Horribly written, refusal to accept the binding ruling of actual authorities, and a convoluted metaphor attempting to show superiority but only conveys unearned arrogance.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1021

Post by realist »

bob wrote: Fri May 12, 2023 12:01 pm I can't be bothered to copy over every "DeMaio" comment, but this snippet caught my eye:
DeMaio wrote:[If] the commenter is willing to accept stupidity and a denial of reality in the courts and by “most legal authorities,” then he also probably thinks that the sun rises in the east (when actually, as the Earth rotates about its axis, the eastern horizon dips, making the sun only appear to be rising)… and he voted for Brandon in 2020.
This is classic "DeMaio": Horribly written, refusal to accept the binding ruling of actual authorities, and a convoluted metaphor attempting to show superiority but only conveys unearned arrogance.
Exactly.
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9554
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1022

Post by Foggy »

I think it's terribly sad that the courts and most legal authorities are stupid and denying reality. I sure wouldn't stick around in a country where that happens. :(

Maybe Joe should consider relocating. :confuzzled:
Out from under. :thumbsup:
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1023

Post by bob »

Kerchner's blog*: WAYNE ROOT: Open Border Catastrophe is the Cloward-Piven Plan to Destroy America That I Learned at Columbia University – Alongside My Classmate Barack Obama
Root (at the Gateway Pundit**) wrote:My classmate Barack Obama and I graduated on the same day in Spring of 1983. This very month is the 40th anniversary of our Columbia graduation.

These Columbia University radicals (and traitors) had a plan named Cloward-Piven. It was named after two Columbia University professors- the husband-and-wife team of Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven.
1. So if you graduated in the 1980s with a degree in politics from Columbia, you're a radical traitor. Just like Root. :towel:

2. So much for the claim that Obama didn't attend Columbia. :crying:



* I expect the inevitable republishing at the P&E.

** Root's original.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1024

Post by bob »

So nice, "DeMaio" wrote it twice (thrice, really): P&E: Revisiting the Heritage Guide to the Constitution:
'DeMaio' wrote:"MANIFEST OMISSIONS"

Recently, your humble servant addressed the flawed reasoning of the “Heritage Guide to the Constitution” (“Guide”) set out in its explanatory analysis of Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5. This, of course, is the Constitution’s “natural born Citizen” (“nbC”) presidential Eligibility Clause, the source of increasing scrutiny and debate as more and more presidential (and fallback vice presidential) candidates announce interest in seeking those offices as the 2024 general election approaches.

* * *

Your servant’s first offering addressed the Eligibility Clause issues alone, based on the digital version of the Heritage Guide eligibility essay downloaded earlier this month, which is to say, in 2023. That section is worded virtually identically to the 2014 edition of the Guide available in hard copy book form. Other changes between and among the original 2005 edition, the 2014 edition and the 2023 digital edition largely reflect changes in the personnel who assisted in the preparation of the editions. However, there are also several substantive changes, discussed hereafter.

* * *

The Present Offering

The present offering – admittedly, a long one, so interested readers should keep a supply of their favorite caffeinated beverage close by – will dig a bit deeper into the preface of each edition, as some useful information is found there.
In this regard, "DeMaio" does not disappoint, as what follows is rambling verbosity, which can be summed up thusly:
In 2008, there were two places where a true definition of the term “natural born Citizen” could be found: (1) § 212 of Book 1, Ch. 19 of the 1758 treatise The Law of Nations by Swiss jurist and legal scholar Emer de Vattel; and (2) the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Minor v. Happersett (“Minor”).
:roll: :yankyank: :yawn:

The actual, substantive differences between the various editions, as cataloged by "DeMaio," are relatively minor (ha!): in addition to stylistic changes the 2005 edition discussed Wong Kim Kim and didn't discuss S.R. 511 (which didn't exist in 2005). :yawn:

Bonus:
Instead of running for President himself, Hamilton supported John Adams (then Vice-President under President Washington) and Thomas Pinckney for Vice-President. Against this backdrop, if the “citizen-grandfather” clause was intended to benefit Alexander Hamilton, it was a colossal failure.

* * *

The more likely scenario is that Hamilton knew and accepted that he was not a natural born citizen as defined in § 212 of de Vattel’s tome and as to which treatise Hamilton’s views and ideas “paralleled.”
Hamilton resigned as Secretary in 1795, to (as they often say) "spend more time with his family." An intervening change of priorities doesn't support "DeMaio"'s beliefs. (And, of course, in 1791 had an affair with Reynolds.)
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5589
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

The dregs of birther remainders.

#1025

Post by Luke »

RAVES at the P&E for "DeMaio". Chuckles is over the moon. And, sure enough, they are starting to wonder how to pull a "Brunson" on other issues.
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)says:
Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 1:01 PM
A superb piece of legal analysis and writing by Joseph DeMaio regarding the original intent meaning and understanding of the “natural born Citizen” term (a national security term) in the presidential eligibility clause in our U.S. Constitution. DeMaio also plainly addressed the faulty and imo agenda driven biased analysis of its incorrect meaning given in “The Heritage Guide to the Constitution” in the piece therein about the “natural born Citizen” term done by James C. Ho. All members of the U.S. Supreme Court should receive a copy of this essay by DeMaio. And also James C. Ho and the Chairman of the Editorial Advisory Board of the Heritage Foundation should receive a copy as well. One or more of us should make that happen. Bravo Zulu to Joseph DeMaio!
CDR Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org
http://www.kerchner.com/books/naturalborncitizen.htm

phrowt says:
Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 12:35 PM
I want to thank you for the substantial effort in your research and understanding of a simple concept made incomprehensible by those with bias and personal agenda. Those of us without the skills to counter or refute all the arguments made to make the ineligible eligible have only our simple common sense to understand the written word. Your essays reinforce our understanding. I love Heritage and the work they are doing. I pray they are the recipient of your writing and use it to fix their inconsistencies where nbC is concerned.
I have a question concerning the Supreme Court. I am aware that Justice Thomas said they were avoiding this issue. How can a citizen bring this to them (like the Brunsons did) based on our confusion as to who to vote for that is eligible under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution? Do we follow the words in the Constitution or those of the political class?
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
Post Reply

Return to “Other weirdos”