Fogbow

neonzx wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 3:47 pm

W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 3:41 pm Regular price for the moccasins pictured are $50-$65 at a reputable shop (I replace mine every 2-3 years now that I'm working from home half the time). That's one hell of a markup.

Well, that is marketing -- they inflate suggested retail prices, then they can offer promo-codes like "ANUS BURGER" and offer up to 66% off!

You must be new to retail price schemes.

(I know you are not new to them)

Chilidog wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 4:10 pm Wasn't Anus Burger the DA in the old Perry Mason series?

neonzx wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 6:36 pm

Chilidog wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 4:10 pm Wasn't Anus Burger the DA in the old Perry Mason series?

That was Hamilton Burger, who was always pissed because Perry won every case. Thus his win ratio sucked and he was never going to get a gig in a private practice.

neonzx wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 6:36 pm That was Hamilton Burger, who was always pissed because Perry won every case.

Suranis wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 7:05 pm

neonzx wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 6:36 pm That was Hamilton Burger, who was always pissed because Perry won every case.

So... Ham Burger?

Suranis wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 7:26 pm I always wondered why he looked so tasty.

northland10 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 25, 2022 7:07 am When he looks at Mr. Burger, he gets a.. Hardee.

I'll show myself out.

Mike Lindell’s “expert” to look for “election fraud” Doug Frank says he recently also had his phone seized at the airport: “As I came out of the potty, there they were - two guys standing there waiting for me.”

Kendra wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 6:32 pm

Mike Lindell’s “expert” to look for “election fraud” Doug Frank says he recently also had his phone seized at the airport: “As I came out of the potty, there they were - two guys standing there waiting for me.”

NBC News @NBCNews 5h
JUST IN: Supreme Court rejects MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell’s bid to fend off a defamation lawsuit the voting machine company Dominion Voting Systems filed over his far-fetched claims about the 2020 presidential election.

Larry Sabato @LarrySabato 5h
If Mike Lindell won’t appear in court, I’m willing to substitute, pillow in hand.
Quote Tweet Duty To Warn @duty2warn 5h
Mike Lindell had already lost attempts to toss the $1.3B defamation suit by Dominion that could bankrupt him, both in the lower courts AND in the appeals court. Today, the Supreme Court turned him down as well, and told his attorneys they will not hear the case.

OrlyLicious @Orly_licious Replying to @LarrySabato
All the MAGAs posting their MyPillow affiliate promo codes are helping Dominion prove their case that Mike Lindell did all this lying to make money. What Gorka, Jenna Ellis et al leave out is they receive a cut when marks use their promo codes. Grift all around.

Larry Sabato @LarrySabato 48m
Replying to @Orly_licious
I didn't realize that. Thanks. Let me stipulate that I have never been given a promo code.

OrlyLicious @Orly_licious Replying to @LarrySabato
Wait, Larry, you didn't know about Promo Code: @JMILESCOLEMAN?
Like Amazon affiliate codes, grifters using Lindell's MyPillow promos get paid. Jenna Ellis grifted on Easter with hers. The free speech absolutist blocked when I asked if she was donating her cut to charity.

BEFORE: Wilkins, Rao, and Jackson, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, the joint opposition thereto, and the corrected reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted. The district court’s order denying appellants’ motions to dismiss does not qualify for immediate review under the collateral order doctrine. Appellants have not demonstrated that the order denied a “colorable” immunity defense, see Broidy Cap. Mgmt. LLC v. Muzin, 12 F.4th 789, 796 (D.C. Cir. 2021), and the order is effectively reviewable on appeal from final judgment, see, e.g., Kilburn v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 376 F.3d 1123, 1133 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Further, the district court has not certified the nonfinal order for immediate appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). See, e.g., Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 474–75 (1978) (“[T]he discretionary power to permit an interlocutory appeal [under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)] is not, in the first instance, vested in the courts of appeals. A party seeking review of a nonfinal order must first obtain the consent of the trial judge.”). Appellants therefore have not provided any valid basis upon which this court could exercise appellate jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

The Question Presented is:

Whether a critic of official conduct may immediately appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 a district judge’s refusal to dismiss under New York Times Co.
v. Sullivan a defamation complaint against him, if the critic’s motion to dismiss accepts the truth of all the allegations of the complaint, and its denial will result in his enduring long and expensive discovery and pretrial proceedings.

Ron Filipkowski 🇺🇦 @RonFilipkowski wrote: Mike Lindell says he is friends with Eduardo Bolsonaro, so he had his “cyber guys” watching the election in Brazil, and he’s pretty sure their election was rigged.