Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 4:51 pm
The article is behind a paywall, but here's the tweet about it.
Fogbow
Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
https://thefogbow.com/forum/
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Page 1 of 3
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:46 pm
For someone that wants everyone to listen to him, he sure spends a lot of effort in trying to ensure people don't hear what he is saying.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:47 pm
He's just pissed that he didn't get piece of the sales....
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:47 pm
raison de arizona wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:46 pm For someone that wants everyone to listen to him, he sure spends a lot of effort in trying to ensure people don't hear what he is saying.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:10 pm
Frater I*I wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:47 pm He's just pissed that he didn't get piece of the sales....
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:11 pm
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:14 pm
carried over from the "former guy thread"
some lawyer wrote:Prior to commencing this litigation, President Trump and his counsel confronted
Defendants with their wrongdoing; however, they brazenly refused to recognize President
Trump’s copyright and contractual rights. Instead, they proffered various flawed and irrelevant
justifications which are unavailing and devoid of any legal merit. Rather than cease their
infringement, or even account to President Trump, the Defendants have doubled down; in an
avaricious attempt to reap more benefits from their ongoing violation of President Trump’s
rights, Defendants have converted the audio not only into an audiobook but also into derivative
works, including a CD, paperback, and e-book—again, all at the expense of President Trump and
without accounting to him.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:15 pm
carried over from the "former guy thread"
I don't think that anyone wants to prevent grandpa from publishing anything.some lawyer wrote:28. As a published author with a publishing contract for future books with Winning Team
Publishing, President Trump has the clear right and capability to publish his own words and his
own voice
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:17 pm
Question: wasn't it already established that the fromer guy forgot to contractually exclude further publications of the pee pee interview tapes by Woodward?
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:21 pm
Yeah, you know, some people would say that's a silly lawsuit.
But the $49 million makes it more serious. He shoulda sued for $49 BILLION.
Then it would be a really serious lawsuit.
But the $49 million makes it more serious. He shoulda sued for $49 BILLION.
Then it would be a really serious lawsuit.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:24 pm
WTF did tfg think he was getting interviewed for, shits and grins? Give me a break.RTH10260 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:14 pm carried over from the "former guy thread"
some lawyer wrote:Prior to commencing this litigation, President Trump and his counsel confronted
Defendants with their wrongdoing; however, they brazenly refused to recognize President
Trump’s copyright and contractual rights. Instead, they proffered various flawed and irrelevant
justifications which are unavailing and devoid of any legal merit. Rather than cease their
infringement, or even account to President Trump, the Defendants have doubled down; in an
avaricious attempt to reap more benefits from their ongoing violation of President Trump’s
rights, Defendants have converted the audio not only into an audiobook but also into derivative
works, including a CD, paperback, and e-book—again, all at the expense of President Trump and
without accounting to him.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:43 pm
Because Woodward just wanted to bask in his presence and enjoy his company by listening to him talk and talk and talk and...raison de arizona wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:24 pm WTF did tfg think he was getting interviewed for, shits and grins? Give me a break.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 9:22 pm
How dare they quote his words verbatim.
- B2982D15-E568-4F70-89D8-18A5C4EF04E7.png (166.59 KiB) Viewed 746 times
- 87943B2D-83D2-4BD1-9F55-20CBC6205377.png (168.18 KiB) Viewed 746 times
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 9:45 pm
This is going to be sooooo.... good!
I'm sure Woodward is prepared for this.
I'm sure Woodward is prepared for this.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 9:47 pm
Discovery? 
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 10:50 pm
IANAL.
Isn't this basically just a contract dispute?
Isn't this basically just a contract dispute?
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 10:57 pm
No. It's a look at me; daddy called a loser, send money suit.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 1:41 am
Yes. While I am a lawyer, this is not my area of the law. That being said, this suit appears to have far more merit than many of the suits filed by Trump over the last few years. Cf. RICO complaint against Clinton, Comey, et al. Of course, I have not seen the defense’s position so I may be completely off base. Trump may not win, but at least his position is plausible on its face, not just crazy lawfare.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 2:07 am
I would think that Simon & Schuster would have had their lawyers review any contracts involved before they published anything. 
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 2:27 am
Yeah, that is exactly right. Neither Simon & Schuster nor Woodward are new at this game. They should be prepared for this. I'd be astonished if they are not.MN-Skeptic wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 2:07 am I would think that Simon & Schuster would have had their lawyers review any contracts involved before they published anything.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:14 am
Gee, a reporter interviews a public figure and makes money on the distribution of said interview. What a dastardly thing to do. 
Shame on you Bob Woodward.
Shame on you Bob Woodward.Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:25 am
Yes, and it's too bad that Trump couldn't find some lawyers to look at the contract(s), if any. Imagine working in the White House and not being able to find any good lawyers, tsk tsk.MN-Skeptic wrote: ↑Tue Jan 31, 2023 2:07 am I would think that Simon & Schuster would have had their lawyers review any contracts involved before they published anything.
Let me guess: Trump didn't attach any contracts to his lawsuit.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:26 am
I hope Mike Dunford posts about this and soon!
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:26 am
But guys, his time with Donald should be <3 Special <3.
Donald J. Trump v. Robert Woodward
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:35 am
Mike had one Tweet on it.