#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

[Luke]

NOW it's clear why we haven't heard from Foggy -- obviously, he's making his way down to Berghof-A-Lago to get his photo taken with Kari, Roseanne, Loy Brunson, and Donald (if available). Why, he could be picking his pal Amy Kremer up in Atlanta RIGHT NOW and driving to Palm Beach together.

SEA LEVEL EXPERIENCE | $100,000 PER COUPLE

2-night stay at Mar-A-Lago, private dinner at Mar-A-Lago following reception with Kari Lake and special guest, photo with Kari Lake and Roseanne Barr, private yacht experience with Kari Lake and special guest (includes lunch), golf for 2 at Trump International Golf Course, and private cocktail reception

[bob]

"For completeness": In re Christine Scott, 11th Cir. Case No. 23-13411, filed Oct. 17, 2023.

For further completeness, the 11th, back in January, dumped Scott's petition as frivolous.

[pipistrelle]

NOW it's clear why we haven't heard from Foggy -- obviously, he's making his way down to Berghof-A-Lago to get his photo taken with Kari, Roseanne, Loy Brunson, and Donald (if available). Why, he could be picking his pal Amy Kremer up in Atlanta RIGHT NOW and driving to Palm Beach together.

SEA LEVEL EXPERIENCE | $100,000 PER COUPLE

2-night stay at Mar-A-Lago, private dinner at Mar-A-Lago following reception with Kari Lake and special guest, photo with Kari Lake and Roseanne Barr, private yacht experience with Kari Lake and special guest (includes lunch), golf for 2 at Trump International Golf Course, and private cocktail reception

For $100,000, I want a vacation with Clarence Thomas.

[realist]

Oooh wow, may have a NEW SCOTUS case . This is BREAKING!!!

Raland's cert. petition (Case No. 23-1073) hit SCOTUS' docket.

(Waiver of) Response due May, 2, 2024. Raland should have his denial before the end of this term. (And, if the past is prologue, denial of rehearing petition over the summer.)

The only question is whether SCOTUS will outright deny or whether at least four justices recuse themselves. (If at least four justices recuse, there's no quorum, which is an automatic denial.)

I presume the three justices named as defendants will recuse. I would not be surprised if all nine recused.

I just checked earlier today. Bob beats me by being belated.

They have not posted the petition yet so I cannot see their brilliance. I'm sooooooo sad.

It’s available at bob’s SCOTUS link.

[bob]

Executive summary of Raland's cert. petition:

"You aren't the boss of me; I'm the boss of you!"

[realist]

4. That the legal lease holding that State court does
not have subject matter jurisdiction in this case is
unconstitutional.

Some careful proofreading there.

Should the Justices of this Court address the merits of this
case then they will have supported the “Law of the Lord”
per the words of Isaiah.

The “law of the Lord” as defined by religious scholars is the
Constitution. See page 5 of the complaint.

[northland10]

It’s available at bob’s SCOTUS link.

Yeah, now. There was a delay between the docket entry and the docs showing up. I figured they would show up a bit later.

[northland10]

Should the Justices of this Court address the merits of this
case then they will have supported the “Law of the Lord”
per the words of Isaiah.

The “law of the Lord” as defined by religious scholars is the
Constitution. See page 5 of the complaint.

I know actual religious scholars with real academic credentials. None of them say that.

[Rolodex]

Anyone who can pay $100,000 probably has access to (or owns) a yacht.

[northland10]

4. That the legal lease holding that State court does
not have subject matter jurisdiction in this case is
unconstitutional.

Some careful proofreading there.

For the record, this one is not my copy/paste fault.

[northland10]

4. That the legal lease holding that State court does
not have subject matter jurisdiction in this case is
unconstitutional.

Some careful proofreading there.

At least he's consistent. From his appellant brief:

Screenshot 2024-04-03 185048.png (53.88 KiB) Viewed 433 times

[northland10]

Should the Justices of this Court address the merits of this
case then they will have supported the “Law of the Lord”
per the words of Isaiah.

The “law of the Lord” as defined by religious scholars is the
Constitution. See page 5 of the complaint.

Since he did not include said complaint in the appendix, this is what he was talking about.

Screenshot 2024-04-03 185506-th.jpg (56.43 KiB) Viewed 428 times

Most non-KJV translations refer to Isaiah 30:09 as instruction of the Lord, not the Law of the Lord.

[bob]

The inevitable waiver* should be filed this week. Which should set up a mid/late-June denial. (And an ob. midsummer rehearing denial.)

But I am lurvin' that the Brunson traffic on the bird dumpster-fire site is all about ... the Knicks player who is on fire, and not these losers.


* Aka "a sanctionable/disbarable offense," according to Lake.

[realist]

The inevitable waiver* should be filed this week. Which should set up a mid/late-June denial. (And an ob. midsummer rehearing denial.)

But I am lurvin' that the Brunson traffic on the bird dumpster-fire site is all about ... the Knicks player who is on fire, and not these losers.


* Aka "a sanctionable/disbarable offense," according to Lake.

[noblepa]

Wow! King James VI was amazingly prescient.

The bible edition that bears his name was commissioned in 1604 and first published in 1611, 176 years BEFORE the US Constitution was written, in 1787.

Yet, somehow, he knew that almost two centuries later, someone would write a founding document for a country no one had even dreamed of and that that document would be the revealed word of God.

Even Nostradamus wasn't THAT good.

[bob]

To what does Rikker desire a link?

[Sam the Centipede]

Wow! King James VI was amazingly prescient.

The bible edition that bears his name was commissioned in 1604 and first published in 1611, 176 years BEFORE the US Constitution was written, in 1787.

I'm no theologian or apologist but I don't think the compilers of the KJV considered themselves the original authors of the text, only translators and editors, so you need to go back to the Middle East almost three thousand years ago to find the real authors of the US constitution.

Maybe Lehi and Sariah brought that constitution to America around 600 BCE? Perhaps on gold plates written in hieroglyphs that could be translated with a magic hat?

[RTH10260]

Do we have any evidence that those computer tablets of Moses carried from the moutain did not contain the US Constitution

[Sam the Centipede]

Do we have any evidence that those computer tablets of Moses carried from the mountain did not contain the US Constitution

They were conveniently lost … or were they?!?!??!?!?!

Well done though RTH, that's good solid birther-think. In the absence of disproof accepted by the birthers, any convenient hypothesis/conjecture/nonsense is considered proven.

[scirreeve]

Raland is still keeping busy being a pretend lawyer for Paul-Kenneth: House of Cromar. To be fair in the motions he drafts for Kenny he no longer calls himself an attorney but he is now a "trusted advisor of law".

[northland10]

Do we have any evidence that those computer tablets of Moses carried from the mountain did not contain the US Constitution

They were conveniently lost … or were they?!?!??!?!?!

We know where those extra Constitution commandments went.