Holy smokes, just tried ChatAI and it's unbelievable. As Foggy often says, we're in a world beyond our imagination. I asked ChatAI a few questions about birthers and it immediately came up with these. These are my questions and the nearly instant replies. You won't believe it. The URL is
, you have to sign up but it's free. As so many have written, this is revolutionary and game-changing for search and simple answers. Looks for the BONUS questions at the end.
What are "birthers" and why do they keep perpetuating false beliefs?
"Birthers" are individuals who promote the false belief that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President. This belief is not supported by any evidence, and it has been debunked multiple times by state officials, fact-checkers, and the President himself.
The origins of the birther movement can be traced back to the 2008 presidential election, when rumors began to spread that Obama was not a natural-born citizen of the United States. Despite being debunked repeatedly, the birther movement continued to gain traction, and it was eventually embraced by then-candidate Donald Trump, who questioned Obama's citizenship and demanded to see his birth certificate.
There are many reasons why birthers continue to perpetuate false beliefs about Obama's citizenship. Some may do so out of a genuine belief in the conspiracy theory, while others may be motivated by political or racial biases. Additionally, the spread of false information on social media and other online platforms has made it easier for birthers to find and connect with each other, and to amplify their beliefs to a wider audience.
Ultimately, the persistence of the birther movement highlights the power of false information and conspiracy theories to gain traction and influence public opinion, even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It also underscores the importance of fact-checking and critical thinking in combatting misinformation.
Are "birthers" racist, mentally ill or just misinformed?
It is not possible to determine with certainty whether "birthers" are racist, mentally ill, or just misinformed, as this is a complex and nuanced question that would require a detailed examination of the individual beliefs, motivations, and backgrounds of birthers.
However, some studies and analyses have suggested that birtherism may be related to racism and prejudice against Obama, who is the first African-American President of the United States. For example, a study published in the journal Public Opinion Quarterly in 2012 found that birtherism was more common among individuals who expressed strong racial resentment towards African Americans, and that birtherism was more likely to be endorsed by individuals who held negative stereotypes and prejudices towards African Americans.
Additionally, some experts have suggested that birtherism may be related to psychological factors such as cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias, which are common psychological phenomena that can lead individuals to reject facts and evidence that contradict their beliefs. For example, individuals who are strongly committed to the belief that Obama is not a natural-born citizen may be more likely to reject evidence that contradicts this belief, and to seek out and accept information that supports their belief, even if it is false or misleading.
In conclusion, while it is not possible to determine with certainty whether "birthers" are racist, mentally ill, or just misinformed, some studies and analyses have suggested that birtherism may be related to racism and prejudice against Obama, and that it may also be related to psychological factors such as cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias.
What was Orly Taitz' role in the "Birther" movement?
Orly Taitz was a prominent figure in the "birther" movement, which promoted the false belief that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President.
Taitz was born in Moldova and immigrated to the United States in 1987. She became a dentist and a lawyer, and in 2009 she began to publicly question Obama's citizenship and eligibility to serve as President. She filed several lawsuits challenging Obama's citizenship, and she became known for her outspoken and controversial statements about the issue.
Taitz was widely criticized for her role in the birther movement, and her lawsuits were dismissed by multiple courts for lacking evidence and legal merit. Despite this, she continued to promote the birther conspiracy theory and to make false and inflammatory claims about Obama and his administration.
In conclusion, Orly Taitz was a prominent and controversial figure in the birther movement, and she played a significant role in promoting the false belief that Obama was not a natural-born citizen of the United States.
List the cases that "birther" Orly Taitz has lost. Has Orly Taitz been sanctioned? What happened?
Orly Taitz is a lawyer and a prominent figure in the "birther" movement, which promotes the false belief that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President.
Taitz has filed multiple lawsuits challenging Obama's citizenship and eligibility to serve as President. These lawsuits have been dismissed by multiple courts for lacking evidence and legal merit. Some examples of cases that Taitz has lost include:
Taitz v. Obama (2009): Taitz filed a lawsuit in a federal court in California alleging that Obama was not a natural-born citizen and was therefore ineligible to serve as President. The lawsuit was dismissed by the court, which ruled that Taitz lacked standing to bring the suit and that her claims were baseless.
Taitz v. Astrue (2011): Taitz filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Georgia alleging that the Commissioner of Social Security had illegally issued a social security number to Obama. The lawsuit was dismissed by the court, which ruled that Taitz had no legal right to challenge the issuance of the social security number and that her claims were without merit.
Taitz v. Sebelius (2012): Taitz filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Florida alleging that Obama was not a natural-born citizen and was therefore ineligible to serve as President. The lawsuit was dismissed by the court, which ruled that Taitz lacked standing to bring the suit and that her claims were frivolous and without merit.
Taitz has also been sanctioned by several courts for making frivolous and baseless legal arguments, for filing frivolous lawsuits, and for engaging in unethical conduct. For example, in 2011, a federal judge ordered Taitz to pay more than $20,000 in sanctions and legal fees for bringing a frivolous lawsuit and for making false and inflammatory statements about the judge and other parties involved in the case. In 2012, a state court in California also ordered Taitz to pay more than $4,000 in sanctions and legal fees for bringing a frivolous lawsuit and for engaging in unethical conduct.
In conclusion, Taitz has lost multiple lawsuits challenging Obama's citizenship and eligibility to serve as President, and she has been sanctioned by several courts for making frivolous and baseless legal arguments.
What crazy things has "birther" Orly Taitz done?
Orly Taitz is an American political commentator and conspiracy theorist who is known for her involvement in the "birther" movement. The "birther" movement is a political movement that promotes the false belief that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President.
Taitz has been involved in promoting birther conspiracy theories and false information for many years, and she has been involved in several legal challenges to Obama's eligibility to serve as President. Some of the more notable or "crazy" things that she has done include:
Filing a lawsuit in 2008 that sought to have Obama removed from the ballot in Illinois on the grounds that he was not a natural-born citizen of the United States. The lawsuit was dismissed by the court, and Taitz was ordered to pay court costs.
Claiming that Obama's birth certificate was fake and that he was not a US citizen. These claims were debunked by fact-checking organizations and other experts, and they were widely criticized for being false and misleading.
Accusing Obama of using a stolen Social Security number and of being a secret Muslim who was ineligible to serve as President. These claims were also debunked by fact-checking organizations and other experts, and they were found to be without merit.
Filing a lawsuit in 2011 that sought to have Obama removed from office on the grounds that he was not a natural-born citizen of the United States. The lawsuit was dismissed by the court, and Taitz was ordered to pay court costs.
Running for the US Senate in California as a Republican candidate in 2010. She was defeated in the primary election and did not advance to the general election. During her campaign, she continued to promote birther conspiracy theories and false claims about Obama's eligibility to serve as President.
In conclusion, Orly Taitz has been involved in many "crazy" things related to her promotion of birther conspiracy theories and false information. She has filed lawsuits, run for political office, and made numerous false and misleading claims about President Obama and his eligibility to serve as President.
Who is "birther" Sharon Rondeau and what is her role in the "birther" movement?
Sharon Rondeau is an American political commentator and conspiracy theorist who is known for her involvement in the "birther" movement. The "birther" movement is a political movement that promotes the false belief that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President.
Rondeau has been active in the birther movement for many years, and she is the editor and publisher of The Post & Email, a website that promotes birther conspiracy theories and misinformation. Rondeau has also been involved in several legal challenges to Obama's eligibility to serve as President, including a lawsuit filed in 2010 that sought to have Obama removed from the ballot in Tennessee.
In conclusion, Sharon Rondeau is a prominent figure in the "birther" movement, and she is known for her involvement in promoting birther conspiracy theories and for her legal challenges to Obama's eligibility to serve as President.
Who is Commander Charles Kerchner? How is he involved in the "birther" movement?
Commander Charles Kerchner is an American political commentator and conspiracy theorist who is known for his involvement in the "birther" movement. The "birther" movement is a political movement that promotes the false belief that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President.
Kerchner is the founder of the "Birther Summit", an organization that promotes birther conspiracy theories and misinformation. He is also the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit filed in 2008 that sought to have Obama removed from the ballot in Pennsylvania on the grounds that he was not a natural-born citizen of the United States. The lawsuit was dismissed by the court, and Kerchner was ordered to pay court costs.
In conclusion, Commander Charles Kerchner is a prominent figure in the "birther" movement, and he is known for his involvement in promoting birther conspiracy theories and misinformation. He is the founder of the "Birther Summit" and the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit that sought to have President Obama removed from the ballot in Pennsylvania.
What legal cases can be used to reject "birther" falsehoods and arguments regarding "Natural Born Citizenship"? [Note: didn't know about the Susan B. Anthony case]
There are several legal cases that can be used to reject the "birther" falsehoods and arguments regarding "natural-born citizenship." These cases establish that an individual can be considered a natural-born citizen of the United States regardless of the citizenship of their parents, and that the text and intent of the US Constitution support this interpretation.
Some examples of legal cases that can be used to reject the birthers' false claims and arguments include:
Minor v. Happersett (1874): This case was heard by the Supreme Court of the United States, and it established that an individual can be considered a natural-born citizen of the United States even if one or both of their parents are not US citizens. The Court held that the naturalization laws of the United States do not create a distinction between natural-born and naturalized citizens, and that all individuals born in the United States are considered natural-born citizens.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898): This case was also heard by the Supreme Court, and it upheld the principle established in Minor v. Happersett that an individual can be considered a natural-born citizen of the United States even if one or both of their parents are not US citizens. The Court held that an individual who is born in the United States is a US citizen by virtue of their birth in the United States, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.
United States v. Susan B. Anthony (1873): This case was heard by the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York, and it established that an individual who is born in the United States is a US citizen by virtue of their birth in the United States, regardless of their gender or the citizenship of their parents. The Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees birthright citizenship, applies to all individuals born in the United States, including women.
In conclusion, there are multiple legal cases that can be used to reject the "birther" falsehoods and arguments regarding "natural-born citizenship," and these cases establish that an individual can be considered a natural-born citizen of the United States regardless of the citizenship of their parents.
What other cases support President Obama's eligibility to be president, rejecting "birther" claims?
There are several legal cases that support President Obama's eligibility to serve as President and that reject the "birther" claims that he was not born in the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as President. These cases establish that Obama was born in Hawaii, which is a state of the United States, and that he is therefore a natural-born citizen of the United States and eligible to serve as President.
Some examples of legal cases that support Obama's eligibility to serve as President and reject the birther claims include:
Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (2009): This case was heard by the Court of Appeals of Indiana, and it rejected a challenge to Obama's eligibility to serve as President based on the birther claim that he was not born in the United States. The Court held that Obama was born in Hawaii, which is a state of the United States, and that he is therefore a natural-born citizen of the United States and eligible to serve as President.
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (2010): This case was heard by the Superior Court of Connecticut, and it rejected a challenge to Obama's eligibility to serve as President based on the birther claim that he was not born in the United States. The Court held that Obama was born in Hawaii, which is a state of the United States, and that he is therefore a natural-born citizen of the United States and eligible to serve as President.
Berg v. Obama (2008): This case was heard by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and it rejected a challenge to Obama's eligibility to serve as President based on the birther claim that he was not born in the United States. The Court held that Obama was born in Hawaii, which is a state of the United States, and that he is therefore a natural-born citizen of the United States and eligible to serve as President.
In conclusion, there are multiple legal cases that support President Obama's eligibility to serve as President and that reject the birther claims that he was not born in the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as President. These cases establish that Obama was born in Hawaii, which is a state of the United States, and that he is therefore a natural-born citizen of the United States and eligible to serve as President.
Why do "Birthers" use the legal case "Minor vs Happersett" to support their false claims?
"Birthers" who believe that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States often cite the legal case of Minor v. Happersett as support for their false claims. In this case, which was decided by the Supreme Court in 1875, the Court ruled that a woman named Virginia Minor was not a citizen of the United States and therefore was not eligible to vote.
Birthers argue that the Minor v. Happersett decision defines citizenship in a narrow and exclusionary way, and that it therefore supports their belief that Obama, who was born in Hawaii to a Kenyan father and an American mother, is not a natural-born citizen of the United States.
However, this interpretation of the Minor v. Happersett decision is not supported by the text of the ruling or by subsequent legal precedent. In fact, the decision explicitly states that it does not apply to "persons born within the United States, and not subject to any foreign power," which clearly includes Obama. Additionally, subsequent Supreme Court decisions and federal laws have established that individuals born in the United States are automatically considered to be natural-born citizens, regardless of their parents' citizenship or national origin.
In conclusion, the use of the Minor v. Happersett decision by "birthers" to support their false claims about Obama's citizenship is not based on a accurate or complete understanding of the ruling or of subsequent legal precedent.
What legal arguments do "birthers" make to support their false claims?
"Birthers" who believe that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States often make several legal arguments to support their false claims. These arguments include:
The Constitution's requirement that the President must be a "natural-born citizen" is not clearly defined, and therefore it is unclear whether Obama meets this requirement.
The Supreme Court's decision in Minor v. Happersett (1875) defines citizenship in a narrow and exclusionary way, and therefore supports the idea that Obama is not a natural-born citizen.
Obama's birth certificate is fraudulent or forged, and therefore it cannot be used as evidence of his citizenship.
Obama's father was not a citizen of the United States at the time of his birth, and therefore he cannot be considered a natural-born citizen.
However, these legal arguments are not supported by the text of the Constitution, by legal precedent, or by factual evidence. The Constitution clearly states that individuals born in the United States are considered to be natural-born citizens, regardless of their parents' citizenship or national origin. The Minor v. Happersett decision does not apply to individuals born in the United States, and subsequent Supreme Court decisions and federal laws have affirmed this. Obama's birth certificate has been examined by multiple independent experts, who have concluded that it is genuine. And Obama's father was not a citizen of the United States, but this has no bearing on Obama's own citizenship status, as he was born in the United States.
In conclusion, the legal arguments made by "birthers" to support their false claims about Obama's citizenship are not based on a accurate or complete understanding of the Constitution, legal precedent, or factual evidence.
Why do "birthers" continue to perpetuate the false "two-citizen parent" theory of US citizenship to be considered a "Natural Born Citizen"?
"Birthers" continue to perpetuate the false "two-citizen parent" theory of US citizenship because it supports their belief that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President.
According to the "two-citizen parent" theory, an individual can only be considered a "natural-born citizen" of the United States if both of their parents were US citizens at the time of their birth. This theory is based on a misinterpretation of the US Constitution, which states that an individual must be a "natural-born citizen" in order to be eligible to serve as President.
Birthers argue that Obama's father was not a US citizen at the time of his birth, and therefore he cannot be considered a natural-born citizen and is ineligible to serve as President. However, this argument is not supported by the text of the Constitution, legal precedent, or factual evidence.
In conclusion, "birthers" continue to perpetuate the false "two-citizen parent" theory because it supports their belief that Obama is not a natural-born citizen and is therefore ineligible to serve as President. However, this theory is not supported by the Constitution or by legal precedent, and it has been debunked by multiple independent experts and fact-checkers.
What's the best way to stop "birthers" from continuing to lie?
There is no easy or straightforward way to stop "birthers" from continuing to lie about former President Barack Obama's citizenship. However, there are some steps that can be taken to combat their false claims and to prevent them from gaining traction and influence.
First, it's important to provide accurate and factual information to counter the birthers' false claims. This might involve citing the text of the Constitution, legal precedent, and factual evidence that support the fact that Obama was born in the United States and is a natural-born citizen.
Second, it's important to challenge and debunk the birthers' arguments and conspiracy theories. This might involve pointing out inconsistencies and contradictions in their claims, and highlighting the lack of evidence and logical support for their beliefs.
Third, it's important to promote critical thinking and skepticism, and to encourage people to seek out multiple sources of information and to verify the accuracy and credibility of the claims that they encounter. This can help to prevent individuals from being swayed by false or misleading information, and to foster a more informed and discerning public.
Finally, it's important to engage in dialogue and to listen to the concerns and perspectives of birthers and others who hold false beliefs. While it's important to challenge and refute their claims, it's also important to understand why they believe what they do and to try to find common ground and ways to address their concerns.
What role did Mike Zullo and Joe Arpaio play in the "birther" movement?
Mike Zullo and Joe Arpaio played a significant role in promoting the false "birther" conspiracy theory that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President.
Zullo was a former police officer who served as the lead investigator on a "birther" investigation led by Arpaio, who was the sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. In 2011, Arpaio tasked Zullo with investigating Obama's birth certificate, which had been released by the White House in response to birther claims. Despite the fact that multiple independent experts had concluded that the birth certificate was genuine, Zullo and Arpaio claimed that it was fraudulent and that it contained multiple "errors" and "anomalies."
Zullo and Arpaio held multiple press conferences and public events to promote their birther investigation and its findings, and they gained significant media attention and support from other birthers. However, their claims were repeatedly debunked by fact-checkers, legal experts, and even the FBI, which concluded that the birth certificate was genuine and that there was no evidence of fraud.
In conclusion, Mike Zullo and Joe Arpaio played a significant role in promoting the birther conspiracy theory and in attempting to undermine the legitimacy of President Obama's presidency. However, their claims were not supported by evidence or by legal precedent, and they were widely criticized and debunked.
What role did Miki Booth play in the "birther" movement?
Miki Booth was a prominent figure in the "birther" movement, which promoted the false belief that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President.
Booth was a conservative activist and filmmaker who became involved in the birther movement in 2009, when she produced a documentary film called "A Question of Eligibility" that questioned Obama's citizenship. She also ran a website called "Obamareleaseyourrecords.com" that promoted the birther conspiracy theory and solicited donations to support her research.
Booth was a frequent guest on conservative talk radio shows and a regular speaker at birther events and conferences, where she promoted her film and her belief that Obama was not a natural-born citizen. She also filed a lawsuit against Obama and other government officials, claiming that they had conspired to cover up evidence of his foreign birth.
In conclusion, Miki Booth was a prominent and vocal figure in the birther movement, and she played a significant role in promoting the false belief that Obama was not a natural-born citizen of the United States.
What is the website "The Post & Email" and what role does it play in the "birther" movement?
"The Post & Email" is a website that is known for promoting the false "birther" conspiracy theory that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and therefore was not eligible to serve as President. The website was founded in 2009 by Sharon Rondeau, who describes herself as an investigative journalist and birther activist.
The Post & Email is primarily known for publishing articles and editorials that promote the birther conspiracy theory and challenge the legitimacy of Obama's presidency. These articles often include false and misleading claims about Obama's birth certificate, his family background, and his eligibility to serve as President. The website also publishes interviews and columns by other birthers, as well as letters and statements from individuals who claim to have evidence of Obama's foreign birth.
In addition to its editorial content, The Post & Email also operates a "whistleblower hotline" that allows individuals to submit information and documents that they claim support the birther conspiracy theory. The website has claimed that it has received hundreds of such submissions, but it has not provided any evidence to support the veracity or relevance of this information.
In conclusion, The Post & Email is a website that promotes the false birther conspiracy theory and that serves as a platform for birthers to share their beliefs and to seek support for their claims.
And about... The Fogbow!
You can ask anything, just picked birfers to check it out. Note that it's not always accurate (it has Fogbow as 2008 and 2010) but many P&E stories can just be debunked now by using ChatAI. Some Jerk totally needs to try it out