State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

Abandon reality, all ye who enter here. *Democracy*Under*Threat*
User avatar
Rolodex
Posts: 1016
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2023 12:06 pm

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1776

Post by Rolodex »

The best thing would be for the "Trump" "brand" to become worthless. He always uses that as a main part of his "worth" when talking about how rich he is. It's true that brand name does have a value when you're doing financial statements (although how you'd monetize that is a mystery to me), but I gotta think his is taking a hit. Maybe it will hit its nadir before the election. Idk how people around the world feel...staying in a "Trump" branded hotel can't have the same cachet it once did. I'm sure oligarchs and mob folks don't care what name is slapped on the building of a property they use to park money.
Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain
User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 6017
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1777

Post by Suranis »

It IS largely worthless. The fact that he talks it up is meaningless. He would be loudly talking it up if bank managers were laughing in his ear 5 minutes before. He would still be boasting about how wealthy he is if he was on the street outside Marry Lardo with his luggage all around him, and his staff shouting at him that they haven't been paid in a month.

Just because he boasts about it does not mean there is any wealth there.
Hic sunt dracones
User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 6637
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
Location: Too close to trump
Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
Verified:

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1778

Post by Slim Cognito »

I think that a trump-branded hotel screams “Park it here!”
My Crested Yorkie, Gilda and her amazing hair.


ImageImageImage x4
User avatar
Dr. Ken
Posts: 2534
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:12 pm
Contact:

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1779

Post by Dr. Ken »

Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 8:21 pm
Dave from down under wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:57 pm of course you would change the name to..
The Former Guy Tower ;)
or Turnip Tower.
Can't we just rename it the Tish Mahal?
ImageImagePhilly Boondoggle
User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 6637
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
Location: Too close to trump
Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
Verified:

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1780

Post by Slim Cognito »

IMG_2337.jpg
IMG_2337.jpg (159.67 KiB) Viewed 815 times
My Crested Yorkie, Gilda and her amazing hair.


ImageImageImage x4
User avatar
Tiredretiredlawyer
Posts: 7733
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:07 pm
Location: Rescue Pets Land
Occupation: 21st Century Suffragist
Verified: ✅🐴🐎🦄🌻5000 posts and counting

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1781

Post by Tiredretiredlawyer »

LOVE IT!!!!!!
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
User avatar
Rolodex
Posts: 1016
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2023 12:06 pm

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1782

Post by Rolodex »

I just can't quit twitter.

Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain
User avatar
Chilidog
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:36 pm

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1784

Post by Chilidog »

Slim Cognito wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 11:23 am I think that a trump-branded hotel screams “Park it here!”
to me it screams “Get your bedbugs here!”
User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 6637
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
Location: Too close to trump
Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
Verified:

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1785

Post by Slim Cognito »

why not both.jpg
why not both.jpg (41.53 KiB) Viewed 695 times
My Crested Yorkie, Gilda and her amazing hair.


ImageImageImage x4
User avatar
bob
Posts: 5546
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1786

Post by bob »

Uninformed wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:10 am So as to not over-anticipate the outcome of the upcoming deadline for payment to pause enforcement action, can anyone confirm that the payment must be made by the end of today (Sunday 24th March) not by the end of (working?) day tomorrow?
In general, unless specified otherwise, court deadlines occurring on a non-work day (i.e., weekends and holidays) automatically are bumped to the next working day.

So, for example, a court deadline for today would not kick in until COB tomorrow (Monday).
Image ImageImage
Uninformed
Posts: 2122
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1787

Post by Uninformed »

Thanks Bob.
If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10580
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1788

Post by Kendra »

It's almost Monday!!! Everyone have their seatbelts at hand and ready to fasten for a wild ride? :waiting:
User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 6017
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1789

Post by Suranis »

Kendra wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:13 pm It's almost Monday!!! Everyone have their seatbelts at hand and ready to fasten for a wild ride? :waiting:
What? OH NO!!!

Image
Hic sunt dracones
User avatar
much ado
Posts: 1415
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:42 pm
Location: The Left Coast

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1790

Post by much ado »

Volkonski wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:12 am :confuzzled: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Trump claims he has $500 million in cash, undercutting lawyers' claims on bond money

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... rcna144614
Former President Donald Trump claimed early Friday morning that he has "almost" $500 million in cash, undercutting his lawyers' claims that he would not be able to comply with the $464 million judgment against him and his co-defendants in the civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Here's some follow-up on this matter posted by Volkonski, an article in The Guardian. I've noticed that Trump is increasingly called "Idiot Trump" in news articles, a trend I'd like to see continue.

Trump claims to have ‘almost $500m in cash’ despite inability to pay bond
Donald Trump claimed on Friday to have at his disposal “almost $500m in cash”, despite having complained about a $454m bond his lawyers say he cannot pay as he appeals a New York civil fraud judgment.

In an all-capitals, early morning post to his Truth Social platform, the former president said: “Through hard work, talent, and luck, I currently have almost $500m in cash, a substantial amount of which I intended to use in my campaign for president.”

The judge in his New York fraud case knew this, Trump claimed, and therefore came up with a penalty which, with interest, amounts to around $454m.

Trump’s lawyers have said it is a “practical impossibility” for Trump to meet that bond by its 25 March deadline. In turn, the New York state attorney general, Letitia James, reportedly took steps towards seizing Trump-owned properties.

One legal analyst called Trump’s Friday morning rant “the dumbest thing he could possibly have done”.

“That is a direct admission by him that he has the money,” Nick Akerman, a former assistant US attorney in the southern district of New York who was a prosecutor during the Watergate scandal that brought down Richard Nixon, told CNN.

“Keep in mind, even with this operating money or cash that he supposedly has, if he doesn’t pony up and put up a bond, Letitia James is going to be able to go in and basically put restraining orders on all of his bank accounts. Everything that relates to him and all of that money is going to be tied up and frozen.

“So if he’s really got that money, he’s got to put it up.”
This is a fatal admission that devastates any attempt to get an appeals court to stay the seizing of his assets pending appeal. Unbelievably idiotic, and probably further evidence of dementia.

Somebody was lying. Tomorrow's events may reveal who.
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 14809
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1791

Post by RTH10260 »

:confuzzled: the claim is that the former guy has all that money for his campaign. May it mean that his PACs and SUPERPACs have that kind of money ready to spen on the campain for Teh Donald, but it is not in his name for the bond. Could he technically loan himself such moneys to pay the bond (and then lose it)?
User avatar
Reality Check
Posts: 2245
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:46 pm
Verified: ✅ Curmudgeon
Contact:

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1792

Post by Reality Check »

RTH10260 wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 8:48 pm :snippity: Could he technically loan himself such moneys to pay the bond (and then lose it)?
:confuzzled: I would think he could escrow the money if it is in cash if that's what you mean. Not gonna happen. :fingerwag:
User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 6637
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
Location: Too close to trump
Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
Verified:

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1793

Post by Slim Cognito »

Regarding Trump’s claims that he has the cash, despite his lawyers previously saying he does not: Kirschner believes 1 – the lawyers are telling the truth; trump does not have the money. 2 – Trump is telling the truth; he does have the money. His lawyers are lying. (not likely). and 3– they’re both telling the truth. At the time his attorneys made the statement, that was the truth. But soon afterwards, somebody, perhaps Putin, perhaps Saudi Arabia, gave him the money. I guess we’ll learn tomorrow.
My Crested Yorkie, Gilda and her amazing hair.


ImageImageImage x4
User avatar
Maybenaut
Posts: 2611
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:07 am
Location: Maybelot
Verified: ✅✅

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1794

Post by Maybenaut »

Another possibility - they’re both telling the truth (sort of), because when trump says he “has” the money, he means he has access to PAC money for his campaign.
"Hey! We left this England place because it was bogus, and if we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto, we'll just be bogus too!" -- Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 6017
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1795

Post by Suranis »

Another possibility: Turnip transferred every cent he and other people have into his personal account for 10 minutes, so he could make that statement and technically not lie.

Which wold be insane, but I repeat myself.
Hic sunt dracones
User avatar
Dr. Ken
Posts: 2534
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:12 pm
Contact:

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1796

Post by Dr. Ken »

Doesn't sound like he's coming up with the money today
ImageImagePhilly Boondoggle
User avatar
neonzx
Posts: 6187
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:01 am
Location: FloriDUH Hell
Verified: 🤩✅✅✅✅✅🤩

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1797

Post by neonzx »

Image
User avatar
Rolodex
Posts: 1016
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2023 12:06 pm

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1798

Post by Rolodex »

He said in 2015/16 that he wouldn't owe anything to anyone because he's so rich he'd self-fund his campaign. I'm pretty sure he did not. Am I remembering correctly?
Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain
User avatar
SuzieC
Posts: 943
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am
Location: Blue oasis in red state
Occupation: retired lawyer; yoga enthusiast
Verified:

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1799

Post by SuzieC »

Appeals court lets Trump off the hook: bond lowered to $175 million. (MSNBC)
Mr brolin
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:59 pm
Occupation: Chief Blame Officer
Verified: ✅ as vaguely humanoid

State of New York vs Trump, et al - the civil fraud case against the Trump Organization

#1800

Post by Mr brolin »

Relevant verbiage....


It is ordered that the motion is granted to the extent of staying enforcement of
those portions of the Judgment (1) ordering disgorgement to the Attorney General of
$464,576,230.62, conditioned on defendants-appellants posting, within ten (10) days of
the date of this order, an undertaking in the amount of $175 million dollars; (2)
permanently barring defendants Weisselberg and McConney from serving in the
financial control function of any New York corporation or similar business entity; (3)
barring defendants Donald J. Trump, Weisselberg and McConney from serving as an
officer or director of any New York corporation for three years; (4) barring defendant
Donald J. Trump and the corporate defendants from applying for loans from New York
financial institutions for three years; and (5) barring defendants Donald Trump, Jr. and
Eric Trump from serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation in New
York for two years. The aforesaid stay is conditioned on defendants-appellants
perfecting the appeals for the September 2024 Term of this Court. The motion is
otherwise denied, including to the extent it seeks a stay of enforcement of portions of the
judgment (1) extending and enhancing the role of the Monitor and (2) directing the
installation of an Independent Director of Compliance.
Post Reply

Return to “The Big Lie & Aftermath of The Former Guy”