Fogbow

Foggy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 4:57 pm Judge Cannon is the Foogy of federal judges.
She never gets anythign striagth.

Kendra wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:28 am https:/ /twitter.com/atrupar/status/1574752603623358465

On Newsmax, Trump lawyer Alina Habba is back to baselessly insinuating that FBI agents planted evidence at Mar-a-Lago

A couple more clips at the link.

Trump’s objections to Judge Dearie’s clear deadlines show that although he is the plaintiff who brought the lawsuit and shd thus want speed, he in effect is “quiet quitting” as he realizes nothing good is going to come of it—and in fact he is worse off having brought the suit.

Foggy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 28, 2022 7:15 am

Off Topic

"sack up"? That's a thing now? I mean, sexist a smidge, we know who has to carry sacks around, poor darlings.

I have to wear a jockstrap to class this morning. Do the ladies have to wear jockstraps? No, they do not.

But otherwise, I like it.


I'ma sack up and get my butt in gear too also.

According to https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 121.0.pdf,new court documents filed Tuesday the DOJ is asking special master Raymond Dearie for an additional day to turn over non-classified documents in the investigation. Federal prosecutors said they needed until September 28 because none of the five vendors they suggested to digitize the cache of documents "were willing to be engaged by Plaintiff."

"Plaintiff informed us this morning that none of the five document-review vendors proposed by the government before last Tuesday's preliminary conference were willing to be engaged by Plaintiff," DOJ lawyers said in a filing on Tuesday. "To avoid further delay in the vendor's scanning and processing of the Seized Materials (defined to exclude "documents bearing classification markings"), the government issued a request for a task order this afternoon with a deadline of tomorrow (Wednesday, September 28, 2022) at noon.

Foggy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 28, 2022 7:15 am

Off Topic

"sack up"? That's a thing now? I mean, sexist a smidge, we know who has to carry sacks around, poor darlings.

I have to wear a jockstrap to class this morning. Do the ladies have to wear jockstraps? No, they do not.

But otherwise, I like it.


I'ma sack up and get my butt in gear too also.

MsDaisy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 28, 2022 12:20 pm

Foggy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 28, 2022 7:15 am

Off Topic

"sack up"? That's a thing now? I mean, sexist a smidge, we know who has to carry sacks around, poor darlings.

I have to wear a jockstrap to class this morning. Do the ladies have to wear jockstraps? No, they do not.

But otherwise, I like it.


I'ma sack up and get my butt in gear too also.

Try one of these.png

I've personally given them up unless absolutely necessary.

Foggy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 28, 2022 12:54 pm Sorry for the threadjack.

So the five companies that refused to do business with Trump are my favorites now.

They didn't say "Well, we need payment up front."

They didn't propose a lot of silly provisions to try to make sure Trump wouldn't interfere and try to screw up the process.

They just flat said, "We don't do business with crooks" or sumpin' similar.

And that's smart, because the minute the company name was released, the Trump supporters would be making death threats and attempts to damage company property.

Don't join the war unless you are prepared to do battle.