Finicum Lawsuit

Poots are fighting for FreeDumb
User avatar
bob
Posts: 2682
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#176

Post by bob »

northland10 wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 1:31 pm To the attorneys, what is the rule on Provisionally Licensed attorneys and PHV? California shows him as Provisionally Licensed as of 2 Nov 2021, i.e. last week.
That's an interesting question. The PHV rules didn't anticipate provisional licenses. The rules as written suggest that, at long as he complies with both the PHV and provisional-license rules, it should be acceptable.

But there are real-world concerns about who is doing all the supervising. The provisional-license rules contemplate a California attorney supervising, so I could see a court also wanting a PHV application from the purported supervisor as well. Or not, because it is too much busywork for a near-dead case.


Image ImageImage
User avatar
poplove
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Location: Las Vegas NV

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#177

Post by poplove »

The widder has ten days to show cause or the case will be dismissed!!

198

Nov 17, 2021

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Therefore, per Local Rule 41-2(a), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must appear in writing within ten days from the date of this order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. If no appearance is made, this case will be dismissed. Signed on 11/17/2021 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms) Modified date from 11/18/21 to 11/17/21. (kms). (Entered: 11/18/2021)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .198.0.pdf


User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#178

Post by scirreeve »

Also too.
Nov 18, 2021

ORDER: The Court orders Mr. Ryan Marshall to have his supervising attorney apply for Pro Hac Vice admission in order to meet the supervision requirement of the California Bar because Mr. Marshall only holds a provisional license in California. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms) (Entered: 11/18/2021)


Dave from down under
Posts: 1891
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:50 pm
Location: Down here!

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#179

Post by Dave from down under »

:thumbsup:


User avatar
northland10
Posts: 3430
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation:: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#180

Post by northland10 »

Bob called that one. I'm so shocked.


User avatar
poplove
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Location: Las Vegas NV

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#181

Post by poplove »

scirreeve wrote: Thu Nov 18, 2021 6:41 pm Also too.
Nov 18, 2021

ORDER: The Court orders Mr. Ryan Marshall to have his supervising attorney apply for Pro Hac Vice admission in order to meet the supervision requirement of the California Bar because Mr. Marshall only holds a provisional license in California. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms) (Entered: 11/18/2021)
Thanks, Scir. I was going to post that as well but I had to run off before I had a chance. I tried to grab the document from PACER but it was unavailable. That happens sometimes for whatever reasons.


User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#182

Post by scirreeve »

You are the greatest Poppy. I wonder if anyone found Philpoot yet. Status conference scheduled for Dec. 7 but guess it will be cancelled if Philpoot doesn't respond to the Judge's order.
2:18-cv-160-MO - Finicum et al v. United States of America et al (Status Conference)
Date and Time: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 , at 9:30 am
Location : Telephone
Judge: Mosman


Uninformed
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#183

Post by Uninformed »

I’m wondering if this is the best idea Dorthea et al can come up with to breathe some life into what is, and always has been, a dead horse. If the Court dismisses the case they can claim tranny etc instead of appearing in court and and showing publicly that they have no case.The grift must go on.


If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 5064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: TOP SECRET Fogbow HQ
Occupation:: muttering and puttering

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#184

Post by Foggy »

Is Philpoot OK? Has ANYBODY heard from him?


We are NOT going back! - Nancy Pelosi
Mood: circular
User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#185

Post by scirreeve »

Foggy wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 7:48 am Is Philpoot OK? Has ANYBODY heard from him?
He posted some Glenn Beck nonsense on his FB yesterday.


User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 5064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: TOP SECRET Fogbow HQ
Occupation:: muttering and puttering

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#186

Post by Foggy »

OK, so he's not in danger, except from his own mind. He may be having a breakdown of some sort.

Whatever. Glad he's not dead somewhere stinking up the joint. :batting:


We are NOT going back! - Nancy Pelosi
Mood: circular
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 3420
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation:: We build cars

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#187

Post by Gregg »

Foggy wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 1:59 pm OK, so he's not in danger, except from his own mind. He may be having a breakdown of some sort.

Whatever. Glad he's not dead somewhere stinking up the joint. :batting:
But not very glad.


Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
Uninformed
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#188

Post by Uninformed »

“PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO THIS COURT’S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE” filed 11/19 along with a motion to file an amended complaint and complaint (both on PACER).

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .201.0.pdf

Excerpt:
“6) And, the new cause of action, i.e. R.I.C.O. claim, ties all prior causes of action together, bringing all Defendants, dismissed and current, before this Court for adjudication of liability”

R.I.C.O.!!!


If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
poplove
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Location: Las Vegas NV

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#189

Post by poplove »

Thanks, Uninformed! I was taking a nap when the update dropped. That'll teach me to snooze on a busy Friday afternoon.
Anyway, here's the 69 page amended complaint that I just pulled up. (It was a bargain, only 30 pages are billable and I still have lots of my free PACER bucks left.)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .200.1.pdf


User avatar
northland10
Posts: 3430
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation:: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#190

Post by northland10 »

Wait, what? They are adding a new action against defendants who are no longer a party? Is this even a thing?
Edit: Oh, and they already filed a third amended complaint in October. Is this possibly abuse of process?


Uninformed
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#191

Post by Uninformed »

poplove wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:48 pm Thanks, Uninformed! I was taking a nap when the update dropped. That'll teach me to snooze on a busy Friday afternoon.
Anyway, here's the 69 page amended complaint that I just pulled up. (It was a bargain, only 30 pages are billable and I still have lots of my free PACER bucks left.)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .200.1.pdf
And thanks to you.


If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 5653
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#192

Post by Kendra »

poplove wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:48 pm Thanks, Uninformed! I was taking a nap when the update dropped. That'll teach me to snooze on a busy Friday afternoon.
Anyway, here's the 69 page amended complaint that I just pulled up. (It was a bargain, only 30 pages are billable and I still have lots of my free PACER bucks left.)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .200.1.pdf
FYI, I have a Pacer account that I rarely use. If anyone is short on Pacer bucks, just drop me a line. Login and password are kept at the office, so not instant if it's the weekend.


User avatar
scirreeve
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:56 pm

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#193

Post by scirreeve »

Thanks BV and Poppy. I skipped through it and looks similar to the several other complaints (North Korea etc.) but Philpoot just added RICO this time. IANAL but I guess this won't make Judge Mosman happy.


User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 2910
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#194

Post by Suranis »

I'm wondering how long the widow can keep the grift up. The Husband's corpse has really lost its freshness and chewability at this point, so I doubt that the money is coming in as much. Especially with fresh dangling grifters demanding attention and money from the masses.


Hic sunt dracones
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 5064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: TOP SECRET Fogbow HQ
Occupation:: muttering and puttering

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#195

Post by Foggy »

Yeah, but sales of Finicum's book are probably generating a lot ... :nope:


We are NOT going back! - Nancy Pelosi
Mood: circular
woodworker
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:58 am

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#196

Post by woodworker »

Foggy wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 7:20 am Yeah, but sales of Finicum's book are probably generating a lot ... :nope:
Why, if I didn't know better, I would think you are mocking the deceased POS.


User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 6050
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#197

Post by RTH10260 »

I miss the Oldbow, that quoate about "palping his revolver" or something alike :lol:


User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 5064
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: TOP SECRET Fogbow HQ
Occupation:: muttering and puttering

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#198

Post by Foggy »

spalming?


We are NOT going back! - Nancy Pelosi
Mood: circular
User avatar
Azastan
Posts: 1345
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:48 pm

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#199

Post by Azastan »

RTH10260 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 11:29 am I miss the Oldbow, that quoate about "palping his revolver" or something alike :lol:

Urban Dictionary defines 'spalming' as:
To apply ointment or lubricant to the undercarriage of ones self to prevent chafing and or sores.


User avatar
northland10
Posts: 3430
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation:: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

#200

Post by northland10 »

Azastan wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 12:01 pm
RTH10260 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 11:29 am I miss the Oldbow, that quoate about "palping his revolver" or something alike :lol:

Urban Dictionary defines 'spalming' as:
To apply ointment or lubricant to the undercarriage of ones self to prevent chafing and or sores.
Actually, I have never heard that term but the urban definition is basically what I thought it could be.


Post Reply

Return to “Bundys and their elk”