Spring forward.
To delete this message, click the X at top right.

US v Peter Navarro

Post Reply
User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 11592
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
Verified:

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#126

Post by Volkonski »

“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10497
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#127

Post by Kendra »


Peter Navarro's defense attorney is openly questioning in court why Navarro is being prosecuted, yet Mark Meadows and Dan Scavino are not

Defense alleges feds have animosity toward Navarro
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 5502
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation: We build cars

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#128

Post by Gregg »

Doesn't look like Pete is gonna be legally allowed to own firearms pretty soon.

:guntootin:
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
Suranis
Posts: 5830
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#129

Post by Suranis »

Some people just want to watch themselves burn.
Hic sunt dracones
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 5502
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation: We build cars

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#130

Post by Gregg »

and I am so totally here for that.

Go ahead, Pete, jump.

Image
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9554
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#131

Post by Foggy »

Suranis wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 10:49 am Some people just want to watch themselves burn.
I enjoy watching bad people burn :blackeye: so I'm down with that.
Out from under. :thumbsup:
User avatar
roadscholar
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:17 am
Location: Baltimore
Occupation: Renaissance Mechanic
Contact:

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#132

Post by roadscholar »

Simple retort to that allegation:

“Why yes, Mr.Navarro, you are correct. We do have animosity toward people we believe broke the laws of the United States.”

:boxing:
The bitterest truth is more wholesome than the sweetest lie.
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10497
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#133

Post by Kendra »


Peter Navarro has rejected the government’s plea offer that he serve no more than 30 days in jail if he agrees to honor his subpoena. Let’s see what he says after his best pal Steve Bannon goes to trial next week.
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9554
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#134

Post by Foggy »

Hahaha, 30 days, he's looking at an unbelievable nightmare. Sadly (hahaha) he's just not tough enough for jail. They don't feed you great food in jail. The maid doesn't put a chocolate on your pillow at bedtime. They order you around and make you wear bad clothes. They treat you with no respect whatsoever. They're mean to you, and there isn't a goddamned thing you can do about it.

Jail isn't for spoiled babies, pal.

THIRTY DAYS. :twisted:
Out from under. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10497
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#135

Post by Kendra »



I didn't originally post this link here, since in theory it wasn't about the Navarro contempt charges, but for anyone who might have missed this, I think Petey's might have more troubles coming down the pike. Unless maybe he didn't know what his aide was doing? :liar:
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10497
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#136

Post by Kendra »

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 8e41324172
NEW YORK (AP) — The Justice Department filed suit Wednesday against Peter Navarro, claiming the former adviser to Donald Trump used an unofficial email account while working in the White House and wrongfully retained presidential records.

The lawsuit in federal court in Washington claims Navarro used at least one “non-official" email account — a ProtonMail account — to send and receive emails. The legal action comes just weeks after Navarro was indicted on criminal charges after refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

The civil cases alleges that by using the unofficial email account, Navarro failed to turn over presidential records to the National Archives and Records Administration.

The Justice Department is asking a federal judge for an order “authorizing the recovery of any Presidential records in the possession, custody, and/or control of Mr. Navarro.” The suit also seeks unspecified damages.

“Mr. Navarro is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration,” the suit states.
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 5502
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation: We build cars

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#137

Post by Gregg »

"I accidently wiped my phone... honest, Your Honor."
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10497
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#138

Post by Kendra »

I so hope one of the news stations can find some old video of Navarro complaining about Hillary's emails :whistle:

So much cray-cray this week and it's only Wednesday. Lots of material of Acosta's block on CNN Saturday afternoon, but how will the prime time lineup on Fox spin all this stuff?
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 5598
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#139

Post by northland10 »

After all the Hilary screaming, you'd think these folks would have been more careful about things like email and records.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
Phoenix520
Posts: 4149
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Verified:

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#140

Post by Phoenix520 »

Kendra wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:35 pm I so hope one of the news stations can find some old video of Navarro complaining about Hillary's emails :whistle:

So much cray-cray this week and it's only Wednesday. Lots of material of Acosta's block on CNN Saturday afternoon, but how will the prime time lineup on Fox spin all this stuff?
It feels like Karma has reached our sector on her millennial rounds. Here’s hoping she hangs around for a while. ;)
User avatar
Tiredretiredlawyer
Posts: 7541
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:07 pm
Location: Rescue Pets Land
Occupation: 21st Century Suffragist
Verified: ✅🐴🐎🦄🌻5000 posts and counting

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#141

Post by Tiredretiredlawyer »

northland10 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 pm After all the Hilary screaming, you'd think these folks would have been more careful about things like email and records.
The rules don't apply to them, only to everyone else.
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 17656
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#142

Post by raison de arizona »

Peter Navarro trashes Jared Kushner, saying he is lying about thyroid cancer in his book for sympathy, and cost Trump re-election: “Mismanagement of the campaign .. the pandemic .. the guy was just a one-man wrecking crew. His only qualification was he was the boss’s son-in-law.”
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
Gregg
Posts: 5502
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 1:54 am
Location: Cincinnati, Gettysburg
Occupation: We build cars

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#143

Post by Gregg »

Well, he hired you, so that tends to support your thesis.
Supreme Commander, Imperial Illuminati Air Force
:dog:

You don't have to consent, but I'm gonna tase you anyway.
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 9554
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: as seen on qvc zombie apocalypse

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#144

Post by Foggy »

"Daddy? Jared says ..."
:rotflmao:
Out from under. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10497
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#145

Post by Kendra »

User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 14353
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#146

Post by RTH10260 »

Back to jail 5pm :?: :twisted:
User avatar
Ben-Prime
Posts: 2599
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:29 pm
Location: Worldwide Availability
Occupation: Managing People Who Manage Machines
Verified: ✅MamaSaysI'mBonaFide

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#147

Post by Ben-Prime »

Kendra wrote: Thu Aug 11, 2022 10:27 am
Any news yet?
But the sunshine aye shall light the sky,
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.

- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10497
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#148

Post by Kendra »

Not here, I haven't found anyone live tweeting, dangit.
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 5588
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#149

Post by Luke »

Here's what Petey filed on August 4th now that he has counsel (44 pages). He had plenty of money for lawyers, it was his choice to not be represented. Lots of whining, "I didn't knows" & complaining. Sample footnote:
3 / Dr. Navarro, a layman who at the time was not represented by counsel, understood President
Trump’s instructions to be equivalent to an assertion of testimonial immunity. He advised the
Coronavirus Subcommittee that he could not comply with its subpoena and suggested that it
resolve the privilege issues directly with President Trump. The Subcommittee did not pursue the
matter, which confirmed to Dr. Navarro his understanding that, in the absence of agreement
between the Executive and Legislative branches, he was not obligated to comply with the
subpoena.

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... compel.pdf
Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
Kendra
Posts: 10497
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:17 am

Re: US v Peter Navarro

#150

Post by Kendra »


Peter Navarro claims that he has “circumstantial evidence” that Liz Cheney is going to try and steal her election tomorrow with fraudulent absentee ballots.
Post Reply

Return to “The January 6 Insurrection, including Criminal Cases”