Re: Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows, doin' the Q on the phone
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2022 11:51 am
Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
https://thefogbow.com/forum/
Andy Biggs advances his new QAnon-ready conspiracy theory that the whole Ginny/Clarence Thomas J6 situation is a plot to impeach Thomas so he can’t vote to overturn Roe. Gaetz reaction: “That would be deeply sinister. But it shows the depths that the Left is willing to go to.”
I was able to read the article by opening a private window.“We all knew within minutes after Ginni left her meetings with the president, he would start yelling about firing people for being disloyal. When Ginni Thomas showed up, you knew your day was wrecked.”
As an example, Thomas’ wife was so unhappy about the results of the last election that she plotted with WH officials about how to overturn it.
Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the conservative activist and wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, pressed Arizona lawmakers after the 2020 election to set aside Joe Biden’s popular-vote victory and choose “a clean slate of Electors,” according to emails obtained by The Washington Post.
The emails, sent by Ginni Thomas to a pair of lawmakers on Nov. 9, 2020, argued that legislators needed to intervene because the vote had been marred by fraud. Though she did not mention either candidate by name, the context was clear.
Just days after media organizations called the race for Biden in Arizona and nationwide, Thomas urged the lawmakers to “stand strong in the face of political and media pressure.” She told the lawmakers the responsibility to choose electors was “yours and yours alone” and said they have “power to fight back against fraud.”
Thomas sent the messages via an online platform designed to make it easy to send pre-written form emails to multiple elected officials, according to a review of the emails obtained under the state’s public records law.
Hmm.. I wonder who he might have gotten word about a "heated fight" fromWASHINGTON — A lawyer advising President Donald Trump claimed in an email after Election Day 2020 to have insight into a “heated fight” among the Supreme Court justices over whether to hear arguments about the president’s efforts to overturn his defeat at the polls, two people briefed on the email said.
The lawyer, John Eastman, made the statement in a Dec. 24, 2020, exchange with a Wisconsin lawyer and Trump campaign officials over whether to file legal papers that they hoped might prompt four justices to agree to hear an election case from Wisconsin.
Thanks for the link. This is horrifying stuff. Worst of it is that Ginni and, of course, Clarence, are well-nigh untouchable. They’ll go on their merry grifting and crazy corrupt ways until they’re in their graves. No justice for the Justice, that’s for sure.