INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2024 7:45 pm
by MN-Skeptic
Reality Check wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 7:18 pm
It really irks me that even an organization like Meidas Touch Network does not know that the proper phrasing is "DemocratIC appointees". Of course the author is only 24 years old and probably doesn't know any better.
Republicans started doing that in order to irk Democrats. Of course, a lot of folks are too ignorant to realize that the word should be Democratic. So I’ve made the decision to assume that they are all too stupid to know better. And that just reflects poorly on them.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2024 8:14 pm
by Reality Check
MN-Skeptic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 7:45 pm
Republicans started doing that in order to irk Democrats. Of course, a lot of folks are too ignorant to realize that the word should be Democratic. So I’ve made the decision to assume that they are all too stupid to know better. And that just reflects poorly on them.
I seem to recall that I researched this and it went back much longer than I would have guessed. There is actually a wiki page on it.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 10:21 am
by MN-Skeptic
Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney
BREAKING: Chief Justice Roberts gives Jack Smith until Tuesday 2/20 at 4 pm to respond to Trump's call to stay the immunity ruling that would restart his D.C. trial.
I would be surprised if Smith's response filing isn't already drafted, so the question will be when he actually files it (almost certainly before the deadline)
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 5:25 pm
by Flatpoint High
Whoop THERE IT IS
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:39 pm
by chancery
Fourteen minutes of a slow talking host to report a briefing schedule order?
In fairness, I should disclose that I couldn't listen to more than 5 seconds of it.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:18 pm
by MN-Skeptic
Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney
JUST IN: Jack Smith files his response to Trump's stay request at the Supreme Court.
It's 40 pages and urges the justices to reject Trump's stay request or, if they don't, to set an expedited schedule so Trump's trial gets back on track.
Docket SCOTUS Trumo.JPG (158.54 KiB) Viewed 923 times
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 7:26 pm
by p0rtia
Sterling presentation, here. Clear, tells the story, establishes the need for speed by providing the time-line to date. Haven't finished reading yet, so I don't know if they bring up the obvious.
Fun fact: They never use fuckhead's name in the response, other than in the title; when they are citing cases in which his name occurs, and on one or two occasions when they are quoting the remarks of others. He is "applicant" throughout. Every sentence, drilling it in that he is just a meat sack. It's even somewhat dehumanizing. I like it.
I mean, I don't call him fuckhead for nothing.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 7:35 pm
by Suranis
I've taken to calling him Turnip. Everyone can misread it as his name, it's clear who I am talking about, but it wont count as a mention of his name in google counts. Heh heh.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 7:58 pm
by W. Kevin Vicklund
Ooooh, it URGENT urgent
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 8:03 pm
by keith
Suranis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 7:35 pm
I've taken to calling him Turnip. Everyone can misread it as his name, it's clear who I am talking about, but it wont count as a mention of his name in google counts. Heh heh.
I noticed that and I like it and I'm stealing it
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:03 pm
by Flatpoint High
Suranis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 7:35 pm
I've taken to calling him Turnip. Everyone can misread it as his name, it's clear who I am talking about, but it wont count as a mention of his name in google counts. Heh heh.
I've been calling him "donnie dookiepans" for a while.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith
p0rtia wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2024 7:26 pm
I mean, I don't call him fuckhead for nothing.
My daughters and I call him fuckface, as in fuckface von clownstick which is what Jon Stewart accurately called him years ago.
Did you catch the new one? Nice seeing Jon back in the chair. But…
New York Times Pitchbot @DougJBalloon wrote:
A Trump victory in November would end American democracy. Here’s why I’m going to spend the next nine months making lame jokes about Biden’s age.
by Jon Stewart
Accurate, I’m afraid.
INDICTED (INDICATED) #3 USA v Donald Trump - Judge Tanya Chutkan - #J6 Election Interference, Fake Electors - Jack Smith