Fogbow

SuzieC wrote: ↑Thu Oct 13, 2022 5:19 pm When is he going to stroke out after his near-daily shitfits?

He’s not wired like most actual humans. I think the outrage fuels him.

SuzieC wrote: ↑Thu Oct 13, 2022 5:19 pm When is he going to stroke out after his near-daily shitfits?

Many dictators, after thwarting a violent coup attempt, allow their opponent to then leave voluntarily to live in a mansion with free Secret Service, while raising hundreds of millions of dollars calling said dictator an illegitimate criminal, with absolutely zero consequences.

Yeah - the eight year old in a mans body

I'm going to have to find time to read that Secret Service book. I don't trust them.

Walt Tuttle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:14 pm

SuzieC wrote: ↑Thu Oct 13, 2022 5:19 pm When is he going to stroke out after his near-daily shitfits?

He’s not wired like most actual humans. I think the outrage fuels him.

Rage means that he does not have time to hear the voice in the back of his head whispering that he is a loser. Everything he does is to avoid people realizing that he is a loser and rather pathetic. Deep down they have a deep feeling of inadequacy and they work hard to make sure people cant see it. Shame and fear is what drives a narcissist fear that people will see it.

When they cant make up a reason why they are still a winner, a Narcissist collapses into a deep sense of pain.

pipistrelle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 13, 2022 10:29 pm I'm going to have to find time to read that Secret Service book. I don't trust them.

Which book?

Carol Leonnig’s book on the SS. A real eye opener. Elite corps? Meh.

Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:12 am Carol Leonnig’s book on the SS. A real eye opener. Elite corps? Meh.

Thank you! I'll take a look at it

Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:12 am Carol Leonnig’s book on the SS. A real eye opener. Elite corps? Meh.

Excellent book, I recommend it as well.

And Hillary Clinton said Trump didn’t have the temperament to be President…

And the grift goes on.

Trump is once again threatening to sue the Pulitzer Prize committee -

So in Trump’s letter he brags on True the Vote, pg 14.

Hours later, the Arizona AG weighs in.

TTV the nation's leading vote scamming operation

That AZ AG letter is a riot, do read. True The Vote has been very, very bad.

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Sat Oct 15, 2022 10:29 am That AZ AG letter is a riot, do read. True The Vote has been very, very bad.

Thank you for urging us to read the AZ AG letter. I had been meaning too, but hadn't done it, and probably never would have if you had not posted.

Essential reading, IMO, especially given TFG's 14 page doodle regarding the Jan 6 Committee's subpoena, in which he reference TrueTheVote.

The grift is all in the open now, everywhere you want to look. With no consequences to date, why not? With the overthrowing of the rule of law being the point, why not?

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Sat Oct 15, 2022 10:29 am That AZ AG letter is a riot, do read. True The Vote has been very, very bad.

I did read it (thanks ).

This part jumped out at me:

During those meetings, Ms. Engelbrecht and Mr. Phillips stated they obtained the unique invididual phone identifier/fingerprint and geolocation data from a private vendor who sells such information for marketing purposes. They report spending $2 million for the information. Prior to each meeting with TTV, Ms. Engelbrecht and Mr. Phillips stated they would provide us with the informationi to support their allegations. Despite repeated requests, TTV never did provide the information it purported to have in its possession.

It sounds like Mr Montgomery has found another outlet for his (vapor)wares.

Greatgrey wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 8:10 pmSo in Trump’s letter he brags on True the Vote, pg 14.

Hours later, the Arizona AG weighs in.

Wow. Sounds like TTV has take lessons from Dennis Montgomery in Bullshitting the Government for Fun and Profit.

ETA: Damn. Ninja'd!

My favorite is paragraph 3, second sentence:

Specifically, TTV alleges it has in its possession geolocation data from a number of mobile devices showing those mobile devices making several trips in which it is said people are walking to, from or past (sic) ballot drop boxes.

Followed by paragraph 3, sentence 3:

Information has not been provided as to the specific location, whether or not there is in fact a drop box at that location, nor is there any information on the person(s) who may be in possession of the mobile device.

Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Sat Oct 15, 2022 2:40 pm IMG_20221015_132310.jpg

My favorite is paragraph 3, second sentence:

Specifically, TTV alleges it has in its possession geolocation data from a number of mobile devices showing those mobile devices making several trips in which it is said people are walking to, from or past (sic) ballot drop boxes.

Followed by paragraph 3, sentence 3:

Information has not been provided as to the specific location, whether or not there is in fact a drop box at that location, nor is there any information on the person(s) who may be in possession of the mobile device.

He forgot to mention; Nor is there any information that said mobile phone user ever dropped something into a ballot drop box, nor information about the same user dropping any ballots into several drop boxes ...

Considering that ballot drop boxes are at much frequented locations it's not surprising that a phone number might be in the vincinity of a ballot drop box without even the intent on using (or even knowing about) the dropoff. If data came from marketing company as suggested, then the nearest location would likely be a block, a mall or such. It's very likely that the marketing company does not even know the individual, just the anonymized tracing for feeding assumed preferred advertisement content. Only police with a warrant would be able to get detailed location information from a telecomm provider to triangulate a position by the reception of several towers.