Fogbow

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:24 pm**

He put a rapist on the Supreme Court, too.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:25 pm**

Kendra wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:21 pm Nothing on Fox website yet. Might take them a while to spin it.

Edit: I turned on Fox channel and they're reporting it live. Didn't listen, I've got the tablet tuned into CNN. Nicolle Wallace should be fun today

They announced it live on air FWIW as soon the $2M was out, before the rest of the verdict.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:26 pm**

chancery wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:21 pm So, at the margin I would have preferred "yes" on the first question, but the fact that it was "no" makes it harder to argue credibly that this was a politicized, knee-jerk jury.

Edit: I too strongly suspect that this was a compromise verdict.

Agree, but Ms. Carroll testified that she was not certain that Trump penetrated her with his penis, in part because she could not see it. She was certain about other details of the assault, though.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:26 pm**

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:26 pm**

Volkonski wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:16 pm Good.

Of course he will appeal this verdict for years.

Sure. But appealing the verdict costs money. How many lawyers has he gone through? How much can he grift from the base?

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:27 pm**

Azastan wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:26 pm
Volkonski wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:16 pm Good.

Of course he will appeal this verdict for years.
Sure. But appealing the verdict costs money. How many lawyers has he gone through? How much can he grift from the base?

Unlimited. They would march through fire for him. Turning over their SocSec checks means nothing.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:29 pm**

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:25 pm
Kendra wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:21 pm Nothing on Fox website yet. Might take them a while to spin it.

Edit: I turned on Fox channel and they're reporting it live. Didn't listen, I've got the tablet tuned into CNN. Nicolle Wallace should be fun today

They announced it live on air FWIW as soon the $2M was out, before the rest of the verdict.

Aaron Rupar @atrupar has a bunch of clips of their coverage if you are interested.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:29 pm**

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:27 pm
Unlimited. They would march through fire for him. Turning over their SocSec checks means nothing.

Which means all the other 'good causes', such as 'election integrity' etc., won't have money coming their way.

There's only so many ways to split that money pie.

And he still has to find a lawyer to keep it going.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:32 pm**

I think now might be a good time to remind people that Monica Lewinsky was a willing participant, and that therefore this is, without question, the worst thing any president is on record for doing.

Well, except George Bush made the worst foreign policy decision in our nation's history (the invasion and occupation of a country that hadn't committed any offense against the US).

And Obama wore the worst tan suit.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:32 pm**

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:27 pm
Azastan wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:26 pm
Volkonski wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:16 pm Good.

Of course he will appeal this verdict for years.
Sure. But appealing the verdict costs money. How many lawyers has he gone through? How much can he grift from the base?
Unlimited. They would march through fire for him. Turning over their SocSec checks means nothing.

Good, keep this on the front burner through the 2024 election cycle. Watch pubs support a convicted sexual deviant while passing all these anti-abortion laws against women's health and let's see another blue wave.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:34 pm**

Yeah, he's still gonna be the Republican nominee for President of the United States of America.

Debates could be fun.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:34 pm**

tfg responds, in all caps.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:38 pm**

He's probably screaming blue ketchup. He will have his flunkies twittering all night on his account

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:40 pm**

"I could shoot a man sexually assault a woman at Bergdorf Goodman on Fifth Avenue and not lose any votes."

I bet Melania is thrilled.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:40 pm**

So, how do we feel about CNN giving someone convicted of sexual battery a Town Hall forum to spout his lies? I know how I feel.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:40 pm**

@atrupar
i wonder how CNN will handle news of Trump's guilty verdict for sexual abuse during tomorrow night's town hall

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:42 pm**

Alas, his cultists won't believe it, and he'll never pay up.

I'd like to see her place a lien on his assets though

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:43 pm**

We know Trump won’t willingly pay up. Plus, appeal, appeal, appeal. Could she put a lien on his property like all the contractors he stiffed?

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:44 pm**

patgund wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:42 pm Alas, his cultists won't believe it, and he'll never pay up.

I'd like to see her place a lien on his assets though

Ninja’d

Great minds, Pat. Amirite?

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:45 pm**

Its possible that rape was found not guilty as She wasn't 100% certain he penetrated her with his micro-peen. It was too small to be certain. The assault was digital penetration (ie his fingers) which she was certain of.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:45 pm**

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:34 pm tfg responds, in all caps.

Oh he has no idea who she is and not his type... but identified a photograph with E. Jean Carroll as Marla Maples, his second wife.

Pay the bill. Donald. There are more train cars coming down the line to get ready for.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:46 pm**

raison de arizona wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:40 pm So, how do we feel about CNN giving someone convicted of sexual battery a Town Hall forum to spout his lies? I know how I feel.

3-1 they hold Trump's feet to the fire and Trump walks out like the chicken he truly is.
2-1 his staff talks him into cancelling.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:47 pm**

Foggy wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:11 pm Okay, now I owe a huge apology to Maybenaut for not improving the poll.

I'm sorry, Maybenaut.

To further explain, she suggested that I add "not liable for rape, but liable for sexual assault/battery" as options in the poll, with the various monetary amounts. But I was being lazy, and I wanted the jury to find him liable for rape, and it only would have taken a minute or two to get the poll done correctly.

It shoulda been:

1. Liable for rape, award > $1 million
2. Liable for rape, award < $1 million
3. Liable for sexual battery, award > $1 million
4. Liable for sexual battery, award < $1 million
5. Defense verdict

... maybe some others, you can have 10 options in a poll.

I repeat, sorry, Maybenaut.

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:48 pm**

They will most likely ignore it at the so-called town hall.

On the verdict--

(First time I got a message that I was using too many smilies.

)

Posted: **Tue May 09, 2023 3:50 pm**

AndyinPA wrote: ↑Tue May 09, 2023 3:48 pm They will most likely ignore it at the so-called town hall.

On the verdict--

(First time I got a message that I was using too many smilies. )

I thought in a town hall that the audience got to ask questions? You think the audience will ignore it?

Fogbow

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump and United States of America (poll added!)