Fogbow

Freedom Watch put Joe Biden before its Citizens Grand Jury [last week]. In previous sessions, evidence available in the public domain was presented to the grand jury and today he was indicted for Negligent Homicide, Involuntary Manslaughter, Reckless Endangerment and the Death of Vulnerable Children, Seditious Conspiracy, and Treason. [ . . . ] Now, we will convene a trial, where Biden will be called to answer for his deadly and reckless crimes that resulted in the deaths of seven Afghan children, 13 American servicemen and many others.

We the People, under the laws of nature and nature's God, as were invoked by our Founding Fathers in our Declaration of Independence on or about July 4, 1776, must reclaim our legal system, as the current compromised and corrupt systems in both Congress and the Courts will not mete out justice.

In sum, now that Biden is indicted, We the People will provide due process in the criminal prosecution of Joe Biden, seek his conviction before a Citizens' Court, and when successful — as the evidence against Biden is overwhelming -- seek a sentence of life imprisonment. We the People will then summon law enforcement and the military, all of which have also been harmed by Biden and his leftist allies, to enforce any sentence that will result from his criminal trial.

For information about the legitimacy of Citizens Grand Juries go to www.freedomwatchusa.org and order "It Takes a Revolution: Forget the Scandal Industry!" For instance, in the landmark case of United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), writing for the majority Justice Scalia held that the grand jury belongs to the American people, not the three branches of government. This is the way the law was administered before Congress enacted the Justice Department in 1870, but the pursuit of "justice" by way of this increasingly compromised corrupt department in the executive branch is not exclusive.

... the Death of Vulnerable Children

bob wrote: ↑Thu Sep 30, 2021 2:25 pm In one of Klayman's cases against the D.C. bar, his chaos strategy is working.

The procedural history is a mess, but the crux of the matter is that, because Klayman sued the D.D.C. judge assigned to this case, that judge recused and a new judge (a Dubya nominee) caught the case. The new judge put a pause on the pending motions (including a motion to have Klayman declared a vex lit), to hold a status conference, so the parties could sort the mess out.

This is a mistake. Klayman will take this action as a green light to dumptruck more motions on the court.

D.D.C. wrote:Plaintiff Larry Klayman, proceeding pro se, has sued—for the umpteenth time—Thomas J. Fitton, James F. Peterson, Paul Orfanedes, and Christopher Farrell.

[Yesterday], Larry Klayman, Esq, the Chairman and General Counsel of Freedom Watch, Inc., and the founder of both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, and a former Justice Department prosecutor, filed a complaint against Joseph Biden, General Mark Milley and General Kenneth McKenzie for crimes against humanity and war crimes perpetrated against civilians, including seven children, who they murdered in a drone attack after Afghanistan was surrendered to Taliban, Al Qaeda and ISIS terrorists.

* * *

In addition to holding Biden and his rogue generals to account before the International Criminal Court, Freedom Watch's Citizens Grand Jury has already indicted Biden for negligent homicide, manslaughter and treason, for which he will soon be tried before a Citizens Court in the United States. . . .

Larry Klayman had this to say with regard to these two actions which seek to hold Biden and his rogue military brass to account for their crimes against humanity:

Klayman wrote: It's time, as I write in my new book, 'It Takes a Revolution: Forget the Scandal Industry!', that the American people rise up and take back the corrupt legal system which allows persons like Biden and his generals to get off scot free. Here, they have committed heinous murderous crimes against innocent civilians including seven now dead children, all for public relations and other nefarious reasons after 13 brave American servicemen, and hundreds of Afghans were killed needlessly at Kabul Airport. Biden is not above the law, and he will and must pay legally for what he did!

bob wrote: ↑Fri Oct 01, 2021 2:31 pm Klayman can't stop losing: another dismissal in yet another Judicial Watch spite case.

D.D.C. wrote:Plaintiff Larry Klayman, proceeding pro se, has sued—for the umpteenth time—Thomas J. Fitton, James F. Peterson, Paul Orfanedes, and Christopher Farrell.

Despite Klayman's complaint being based on speculation and fantasy, the D.D.C. dismissed without prejudice -- so Klayman can throw more of the same of the court.

bob wrote: ↑Fri Oct 01, 2021 2:31 pm (Why D.D.C. judges are being so generous with leave to amend is ... curious.)

jcolvin2 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 1:22 pm The D.D.C. dismissed without prejudice, but DENIED leave to amend, as Klayman had not proffered an amended complaint or provided any suggestion about what additional detail might be supplied.

Given that D.C. has a one year statute of limitations on defamation (See D.C. Code 12-301(4)http://dccode.org/browser/#/12/12-301), I think the outcome is practically equivalent to a dismissal with prejudice.

bob wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 1:37 pm

jcolvin2 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 1:22 pm The D.D.C. dismissed without prejudice, but DENIED leave to amend, as Klayman had not proffered an amended complaint or provided any suggestion about what additional detail might be supplied.

Given that D.C. has a one year statute of limitations on defamation (See D.C. Code 12-301(4)http://dccode.org/browser/#/12/12-301), I think the outcome is practically equivalent to a dismissal with prejudice.

Thanks; that's what I meant. And, yes, the operative speech occurred outside the statute of limitations, so why not just dismiss with prejudice?

bob wrote: ↑Fri Oct 01, 2021 2:31 pm Klayman can't stop losing: another dismissal in yet another Judicial Watch spite case.

D.D.C. wrote:Plaintiff Larry Klayman, proceeding pro se, has sued—for the umpteenth time—Thomas J. Fitton, James F. Peterson, Paul Orfanedes, and Christopher Farrell.

Despite Klayman's complaint being based on speculation and fantasy, the D.D.C. dismissed without prejudice -- so Klayman can throw more of the same of the court.

(Why D.D.C. judges are being so generous with leave to amend is ... curious.)

northland10 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 01, 2021 3:37 pm Oh.... regarding the Fitton dismissal, if he files something else, I am betting it is a motion to reconsider with a motion for recusal on account that Chutkan is one of the judges he is suing in Klayman v Rao, which also deals with Judicial Watch and Fitton.

09/30/2021 17 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte examination of the record. On July 21, 2021, the Court entered a Pretrial Order 6 requiring the Parties to file a joint scheduling report within ten (10) days of their joint scheduling conference, which was to be held "within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint." 6 . The Order cautioned, "[f]ailure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs." Id. The deadline for filing a joint scheduling report has passed and no extension of time has been requested. Accordingly, based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE this case. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. The Parties may move to reopen this matter upon the Parties filing a joint scheduling report. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/30/2021. (tgr) Modified text/status per Chambers on 10/1/2021 (sk). (Entered: 09/30/2021)

Plaintiff LARRY KLAYMAN (“Mr. Klayman”) brings this action against HON. TIMOTHY J. KELLY, HON. TREVOR N. MCFADDEN and HON. DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH for injunctive, declaratory, and other equitable relief for egregious prima facie violations of his constitutional and other legal rights.

8. This case centers around the unconstitutional and other illegal actions of Defendants, each and every one of them, acting in concert, in not just violating their oath of office as federal judges but worse violating Mr. Klayman’s constitutional and other legal rights and discriminating and thus retaliating against him in In re Larry Klayman, Attorney Grievance Docket No. 21-07 (the “Federal Disciplinary Proceeding”) in this Court.

bob wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 1:41 pm
Obviously this petition won't do anything, but someone spent a lot of time on it.

bob wrote: ↑Sat Oct 09, 2021 2:46 pm
Klayman goes full Taitz[/url] and accuses the clerk of disabling his e-filing privileges.

And Klayman wants to move the case to a "neutral jurisdiction." Klayman filed this lawfare; he chose this venue. Heck, Klayman could just dismiss and forum shop.

MINUTE ORDER granting 3 Motion for CM/ECF Password. The Court expects all electronic filings by pro se litigants to comply with the Court's Local Rules. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 9/30/2021. (lccrc1)

northland10 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 14, 2021 9:28 pm So, GIL is supposedly going to file a class action in the Central District of California against the FBI and Christopher Wray for arrests stemming from an insurrection in DC where some folks have already pled guilty. Um, GIL is not a member of the bar in California and I would suspect getting PHV might be a bit tougher, though made easier by his failure to report his past suspension and his current interim suspension.

No, this has nothing to do with publicity-seeking and fundraising.

If he files it, I suspect one of his mouth-pieces in CA will be the attorney of record, and GIL, if he is even listed will be there as PHV pending and the application will never arrive. All filings will be his, including the multiple requests for extensions.