Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
https://thefogbow.com/forum/
The third coming?Atticus Finch wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 1:37 pmI am taking Sun Tsu advice, I am waiting patiently on the river bank hoping the former guy show up.Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:42 pm I took the Rittenhouse verdict hard too. My Buddhist nature tells me I am causing my own suffering. Perhaps the former guy is causing his own too.
Rather more the final going, certainly not an over-sized Moses in a rush basket.zekeb wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 10:44 amThe third coming?Atticus Finch wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 1:37 pmI am taking Sun Tsu advice, I am waiting patiently on the river bank hoping the former guy show up.Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:42 pm I took the Rittenhouse verdict hard too. My Buddhist nature tells me I am causing my own suffering. Perhaps the former guy is causing his own too.
Read Sun Tsu and you understand. Google sun tsu river bank enemyzekeb wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 10:44 amThe third coming?Atticus Finch wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 1:37 pmI am taking Sun Tsu advice, I am waiting patiently on the river bank hoping the former guy show up.Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:42 pm I took the Rittenhouse verdict hard too. My Buddhist nature tells me I am causing my own suffering. Perhaps the former guy is causing his own too.
I think that was Steve McQueen in The Sand Pebbles. There is an old Chinese saying "You have to stand on a hill with your mouth open a long time before a duck flies in." Also, some Asian peoples used to throw their dead into rivers, which colors the saying somewhat.Atticus Finch wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 1:15 pmRead Sun Tsu and you understand. Google sun tsu river bank enemyzekeb wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 10:44 amThe third coming?Atticus Finch wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 1:37 pm
I am taking Sun Tsu advice, I am waiting patiently on the river bank hoping the former guy show up.
"You have to stand on a hill with your mouth open a long time before a duck flies in."
The Republican National Committee is paying some personal legal bills for former president Donald Trump, spending party funds to pay a lawyer representing Trump in investigations into his financial practices in New York, a party spokeswoman said Monday.
In October, the RNC made two payments totaling $121,670 to the law firm of Ronald Fischetti, a veteran defense attorney whom Trump hired in April. According to a person with direct knowledge of the payments, the requests came earlier this summer but were voted on by the party’s executive committee only in recent weeks.
Fischetti has been representing Trump as he faces investigations by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. (D) and New York Attorney General Letitia James (D). There has been no indication that either investigation involves Trump’s time as president or any of his political campaigns.
WTAF?The Republican National Committee is paying some personal legal bills for former president Donald Trump, spending party funds to pay a lawyer representing Trump in investigations into his financial practices in New York, a party spokeswoman said Monday.
FIFYTiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 7:31 am So if we form the Fogbow Party and Foggy is our chairperson chairroooster, will the party pay for the legal fees buffalo chicken wings incurred after our meetups?
I see as our party's logo a silhouette of a rooster a la Hitchcock.
Betrayal: The Final Act of the Trump Show by Jonathan Karl review – a tyrant’s last stand
The ABC News correspondent offers a sobering glimpse of a man unfit to govern and the chaos wreaked by an ego unable to grasp its own ineptitude
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/ ... last-stand
NO! NO! NO! 
it's DJT who is claiming executive prvileges 
THREAD: A wealth of new information about the intelligence briefings for Donald Trump and those around him as a presidential candidate in 2016, as president-elect in 2016-17, and as president has just hit the CIA’s public website.
Here are the most newsworthy details:
1/16
Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 9:57 am Does Biden have anything to do with approving or withholding Pentagon docs? It seems this would be something best decided by the (assumedly) nonpartisan DOD.
Reading the article, this has nothing to do with executive privilege but with the Pentegon review process. I suspect their process leans very heavily on the "when at all possible, redact" mentality. It does not matter what side of the aisle it involves. They are non-partisan in being overly restrictive.
