Fogbow

Greatgrey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:18 pm It means she’s gonna micromanage Dearie and second guess everything he does.

andersweinstein wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:08 pm

realist wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:50 pm

andersweinstein wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:53 pm Trump's team had sent Cannon their objections to the special master's plan. This was initially sealed, but unsealed after the DOJ's filed their response unsealed: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .123.1.pdf| I believe they also submitted a response to the DOJ's response.

But it was crying to Judge Cannon that prompted this.

I have perhaps missed something. The linked document was sent to Dearie. Where is anything Trump sent to Cannon before she changed her own timeline or was it just sua sponte?

Oh, sorry, my mistake. Apologies to Foggy, I had a misconception there. The recent ruling begins:

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Amended Case Management Plan (the “Plan”) [ECF No. 112], filed on September 23, 2022. The Court has reviewed the Plan, Plaintiff’s Objections [ECF No. 123-1], Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Objections and Motion to Modify and Adopt the Plan [ECF No. 121], and the full record. Upon review, the Court ACCEPTS IN PART AND REJECTS IN PART the Plan [ECF No. 112], as stated below:

So ... does that count as sua sponte or not?

AndyinPA wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:12 pmSnark?

chancery wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 5:57 pm Folks, these complaints of judicial misconduct against Judge Cannon have little more significance than GIL’s citizen grand juries, and are also mockable.

Disregard.

Chilidog wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:50 pm I saw something on a Twitter post somewhere that at least one of Trump'd lawyers (BOBB, I presume) had already been subpoenaed to testify to the GJ.

Anyone else see that?

Trump’s legal team divided over how to handle Mar-a-Lago case
New lawyer’s advice to seek an ‘off-ramp’ with Justice Department is not being heeded, people familiar with discussions say

After attorney Christopher Kise accepted $3 million to represent Donald Trump in the FBI’s investigation of government documents stored at Mar-a-Lago, the veteran litigator argued that Trump should adopt a new strategy.

Turn down the temperature with the Department of Justice, Kise — a former Florida solicitor general — counseled his famously combative client, people familiar with the deliberations said.

Federal authorities had searched Trump’s Florida residence and club because they badly wanted to retrieve the classified documents that remained there even after a federal subpoena, Kise argued, according to these people. With that material back in government hands, maybe prosecutors could be persuaded to resolve the whole issue quietly.

But quiet has never been Trump’s style — nor has harmony within his orbit.

Instead, just a few weeks after Kise was brought aboard, he finds himself in a battle, trying to persuade Trump to go along with his legal strategy and fighting with some other advisers who have counseled a more aggressive posture. The dispute has raged for at least a week, Trump advisers say, with the former president listening as various lawyers make their best arguments.

A Wednesday night court filing from Trump’s team was combative, with defense lawyers questioning the Justice Department’s truthfulness and motives. Kise, whose name was listed alongside other lawyers’ in previous filings over the past four weeks, did not sign that one — an absence that underscored the division among the lawyers. He remains part of the team and will continue assisting Trump in dealing with some of his other legal problems, said the people familiar with the conversations, who like others interviewed for this article spoke on the condition of anonymity to reveal private talks. But on the Mar-a-Lago issue, he is likely to have a less public role.