Re: Jacob Wohl
Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 5:35 pm
![Dance :dance:](./images/smilies/eusa_dance.gif)
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
And they are seeking $2.5 Million from Jacob and Jack.Uninformed wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 8:17 pm @NewYorkStateAG
A judge has granted our motion to intervene in a lawsuit against Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman for harassing and intimidating Black communities from voting by mail in the 2020 elections.
We will work to hold these individuals accountable.
Maybe they should start charging for the Donuts at the 1599 Project pressers.neonzx wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 8:21 pmAnd they are seeking $2.5 Million from Jacob and Jack.Uninformed wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 8:17 pm @NewYorkStateAG
A judge has granted our motion to intervene in a lawsuit against Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman for harassing and intimidating Black communities from voting by mail in the 2020 elections.
We will work to hold these individuals accountable.![]()
![]()
JACOB WOHL, [23.06.21 14:16]
Who wants to hang around Mar A Lago (a sleepy retiree venue infested with sleazy con-men) all day long for $150K/year.
Do you? Possibly. That’s fine.
But the smartest, most capable people in the world do not.
That’s why Trump’s current batch of advisors are such dumb, incapable, unremarkable losers.
Zachary Petrizzo @ZTPetrizzo 9h
Blundering right-wing operatives Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman are slated to reveal a 12-foot Ashli Babbitt statue tomorrow morning, but now they claim to know little about the event they planned - as Wohl appears this morning for a criminal hearing in California.
StayAtHomeBrad @brad_stay 9h
Lots to unpack.. did they make the statue themselves? Will it look anything like her? Is the macaroni going to survive the elements?
Zachary Petrizzo @ZTPetrizzo 9h
apparently, it's been in the works for three weeks -- but now it seems like the big reveal has been put on ice! unclear what the statue is (??) made out of or if there is even a statue!
Media Contact:
MediaRelations@fcc.gov
For Immediate Release
FCC PROPOSES $5 MILLION ROBOCALLING FINE AGAINST JACOB WOHL AND JOHN BURKMAN
In First Case Under TRACED Act’s TCPA Revisions, Parties Apparently Made Unlawful Robocalls to Voters’ Wireless Phones Without Prior Consent
--
WASHINGTON, August 24, 2021—The Federal Communications Commission today proposed a $5,134,500 fine against John M. Burkman, Jacob Alexander Wohl, and J.M. Burkman & Associates LLC for apparently making 1,141 unlawful robocalls to wireless phones without prior express consent in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. This is the largest TCPA robocall fine ever proposed by the Commission. It is also the first action where the FCC was not required to warn robocallers before robocall violations could be counted toward a proposed fine, per Congress’s recent amendment of the TCPA.
The FCC’s Enforcement Bureau investigation found that the calls in this case were apparently prerecorded and made to consumers’ wireless phones without the required prior consent.
Subject to narrow exceptions, the TCPA prohibits making prerecorded voice calls to wireless phones without the consent of those receiving the calls – regardless of the content of the calls. The robocalls in this case, made on August 26 and September 14, 2020, used messages telling potential voters that, if they vote by mail, their “personal information will be part of a public database that will be used by police departments to track down old warrants and be used by credit card companies to collect outstanding debts.” The Commission began its investigation following consumer complaints and concerns raised by a non-profit organization.
The Enforcement Bureau worked with the Ohio Attorney General’s Office to identify two dialing service providers that provided subpoena responses confirming the robocall campaigns and identifying the clients who had hired them for this service. The Bureau used the subpoenaed call records and recordings of the calls to determine that the calls apparently went to wireless phones and the message was prerecorded. The consumers who agreed to speak with the Bureau about the calls confirmed they had not provided prior consent to the callers.
The subpoenas also produced email exchanges between the dialing service vendors and Wohl and Burkman about the call campaigns – including choosing which zip codes to target and “the tape we want to go out.”
The calls themselves identified Wohl and Burkman by name and used Burkman’s wireless phone number as the caller ID. Wohl and Burkman also both admitted under oath to their involvement in the creation and distribution of the robocalls, with Burkman stating in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, “That is our call, yes, yes” with confirmation from Wohl.
The Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence (TRACED) Act of 2019 amended the TCPA so as to make inapplicable a provision of the law that previously had required the Commission to issue citations to non-FCC-regulated parties that apparently violated the TCPA. These citation requirements did not apply to the Truth in Caller ID Act, which established caller ID spoofing limits and under which the agency has issued numerous, large fines.
The proposed action, formally called a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, or NAL, contains only allegations that advise a party on how it has apparently violated the law and may set forth a proposed monetary penalty. The Commission may not impose a greater monetary penalty in this case than the amount proposed in the NAL. Neither the allegations nor the proposed sanctions in the NAL are final Commission actions. The parties will be given an opportunity to respond and the Commission will consider the party’s submission of evidence and legal arguments before acting further to resolve the matter.
The Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture is available at: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-21-97A1.pdf
###
Media Relations: (202) 418-0500 / ASL: (844) 432-2275 / Twitter: @FCC / www.fcc.gov
This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC, 515 F.2d 385 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
THANK YOU. I was just coming to this thread to ask the usage of the word "Proposes" and where it goes now before it becomes FINAL!orlylicious wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 6:58 pm But wait, there's more!
There's a full FCC press release -- converted it to Word.
orlylicious wrote: ↑Tue Aug 24, 2021 9:09 pm Sure Neon! And posted another tweet with that legal link to the 11 page Notice -- it's $4,500 per call. Looks like the new Act passed in 2019, the Notice explains it -- they're going to make an example of Jakey and Jack to warn others not to do it. Rough luck for them.
![]()
Apparently not looking for THAT much national attention if they are ignoring a journalist's calls.notorial dissent wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 3:18 am Well, Jakey and the Burke finally got what they wanted, national attention, they made one of the national feeds I watch, just not the kind I think they wanted.![]()
![]()
Zachary Petrizzo@ZTPetrizzo
Gave blundering right-wing activists Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman both a ring regarding the FCC recommending a $5 million fine be imposed on the duo over their illegal robocall scheme - Burkman hung up on me, and Wohl didn't respond.
5:27 PM · Aug 24, 2021·Twitter for iPhone
WATCH NOW: Episode 1 of PredatorDC is available now at PredatorDC.com/pilot. Wohl and Burkman have busted dozens of DC-area sexual predators in their sting operation. Season 1 of PredatorDC has 6 episodes that will air weekly at PredatorDC.com.
ALL SUBJECTS ARE PRESUMED INNOCENT UNLESS AND UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW.