Page 10 of 13

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 2:24 am
by Gregg
George Harrison, you're up.

(noted uke fanatic, and played it better than most)

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:53 pm
by humblescribe
Gregg wrote: Sat Feb 19, 2022 2:24 am George Harrison, you're up.

(noted uke fanatic, and played it better than most)
Yep.

One of my favorites:


Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 4:31 pm
by realist

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 5:21 pm
by Reality Check
Jerry Mander wrote: Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:49 pm The widow Finicum has announced to the Bundy cult that her wrongful death suit has been FULLY tossed out by the court. The judge said to ‘put a fork in it’. :rotflmao:

Of course, everyone except the Bundy cult saw this coming.

In spite of this fact, the widow has grown accustomed to her poot-financed lifestyle and would like people to keep sending her money.

Enjoy:

That was upchuck worthy. Sounds like the poot attorneys are lying to her to give her false hope for the appeal or she is hearing what she want to hear.

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 5:25 pm
by curmudgeon
Cést fini? (Entendre double) ;)

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 6:52 pm
by Gregg
The judge said to ‘put a fork in it’. :rotflmao:
Image

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sun May 22, 2022 1:04 pm
by Dr. Ken

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sun May 22, 2022 1:39 pm
by raison de arizona
The LaVoy Finicum memorial brick shithouse.

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sun May 22, 2022 1:47 pm
by poplove
raison de arizona wrote: Sun May 22, 2022 1:39 pm The LaVoy Finicum memorial brick shithouse.
A perfect tribute for a real shithead. :shit:

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sun May 22, 2022 2:27 pm
by Uninformed
After pointlessly trying to work out what the pictured “memorial” was meant to represent or signify I decided it made as much sense as the ventilated tarpman did. I wonder what anybody driving past will make of it, if they notice it at all.

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sun May 22, 2022 3:20 pm
by Suranis
That does not look newly built. Any chance the Widder is just taking a photo of an existing stopover or picnic area and claiming that its a monument to the rapidly being forgotten Tarp?

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sun May 22, 2022 6:43 pm
by Volkonski
The brick items don't look like they are at the site of Finicum's death.

If they are going to move them there I wonder if they have obtained permission from the authorities.

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Sun May 22, 2022 8:17 pm
by Dave from down under
Volkonski wrote: Sun May 22, 2022 6:43 pm The brick items don't look like they are at the site of Finicum's death.

If they are going to move them there I wonder if they have obtained permission from the authorities.
They claim it is on private land and they had permission..

but being the thieves they are it is probably not..

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 12:44 am
by scirreeve
It is on private land not far from the suicide spot.
► Show Spoiler

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 1:35 am
by poplove
I just checked PACER and there’s nothing new on the widder’s appeal.

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 3:12 am
by Dave from down under
Insert Norwegian Blue skit ;)

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 4:13 am
by Uninformed
Is there a time limit for submitting a brief after filing a notice of appeal? Asking for a grifting friend.

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 8:34 am
by northland10
The brief is filed (last week). Here is the docket from the 9th Circuit.
01/24/2022 1
31 pg, 1.65 MB DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Brittney Beck, Arianna Brown, Tierra Collier, Tawny Crane, Estate of Robert LaVoy Finicum, Challice Finch, D. Jeanette Finicum, Danielle Finicum, James Finicum, Mitch Finicum, Robert Finicum, Tean Finicum, Thomas Kinne and Thara Tenney Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/31/2022. Transcript ordered by 02/24/2022. Transcript due 03/24/2022. Appellants Brittney Beck, Arianna Brown, Tierra Collier, Tawny Crane, Estate of Robert LaVoy Finicum, Challice Finch, D. Jeanette Finicum, Danielle Finicum, James Finicum, Mitch Finicum, Robert Finicum, Tean Finicum, Thomas Kinne and Thara Tenney opening brief due 05/03/2022. Appellees Katherine Brown, Harney County, Oregon State Police and State of Oregon answering brief due 06/03/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12349267] -- (RT) [Entered: 01/24/2022 03:04 PM]

01/27/2022 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Denise G. Fjordbeck (Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301) for Appellees Katherine Brown, Oregon State Police and State of Oregon. Substitution for Craig M. Johnson for Appellees Katherine Brown, Oregon State Police and State of Oregon and James S. Smith, Esquire for Appellees Katherine Brown, Oregon State Police and State of Oregon. Date of service: 01/27/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12353869] [22-35064] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 01/27/2022 04:35 PM]

01/27/2022 3 Attorneys Craig M. Johnson and James S. Smith substituted by Attorney Denise Gale Fjordbeck. [12353873] (RL) [Entered: 01/27/2022 04:37 PM]

01/31/2022 4
2 pg, 146.4 KB Filed (ECF) Appellants Thara Tenney, Thomas Kinne, Tean Finicum, Robert Finicum, Mitch Finicum, James Finicum, Danielle Finicum, Challice Finch, Tawny Crane, Tierra Collier, Arianna Brown and Brittney Beck Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/31/2022. [12355725] [22-35064] (Pierce, John) [Entered: 01/31/2022 10:13 AM]

01/31/2022 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/31/2022.
To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following link.
Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12355984]. [22-35064] (AD) [Entered: 01/31/2022 12:44 PM]

02/02/2022 6
9 pg, 216.36 KB Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12359094] (TSP) [Entered: 02/02/2022 02:58 PM]

02/03/2022 7
3 pg, 4.29 MB Filed (ECF) Appellants Brittney Beck, Arianna Brown, Tierra Collier, Tawny Crane, Estate of Robert LaVoy Finicum, Challice Finch, D. Jeanette Finicum, Danielle Finicum, James Finicum, Mitch Finicum, Robert Finicum, Tean Finicum, Thomas Kinne and Thara Tenney response to Court order dated 02/02/2022. Date of service: 02/03/2022. [12360510] [22-35064] (Pierce, John) [Entered: 02/03/2022 04:37 PM]

02/04/2022 8 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-35064: Paid] ). [12361276] (TSP) [Entered: 02/04/2022 02:24 PM]

02/17/2022 9 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 02/16/2022. [12373176] (RT) [Entered: 02/17/2022 10:36 AM]

05/02/2022 10
6 pg, 177.03 KB Filed (ECF) Appellants Brittney Beck, Arianna Brown, Tawny Crane, Estate of Robert LaVoy Finicum, Challice Finch, D. Jeanette Finicum, Danielle Finicum, James Finicum, Mitch Finicum, Thara Tenney, Thomas Kinne, Tean Finicum, Robert Finicum and Tierra Collier Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 05/17/2022. Date of service: 05/02/2022. [12436409] [22-35064] (Pierce, John) [Entered: 05/02/2022 04:49 PM]

05/02/2022 11
6 pg, 194.09 KB Filed (ECF) Appellants Brittney Beck, Arianna Brown, Tierra Collier, Tawny Crane, Estate of Robert LaVoy Finicum, Challice Finch, D. Jeanette Finicum, Danielle Finicum, James Finicum, Mitch Finicum, Robert Finicum, Tean Finicum, Thomas Kinne and Thara Tenney Corrected Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 05/17/2022. Date of service: 05/02/2022. [12436467] [22-35064] (Pierce, John) [Entered: 05/02/2022 05:38 PM]

05/05/2022 12
1 pg, 100.47 KB Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LK): Appellants’ motions (Docket Entry Nos. [10] and [11]) for an extension of time to file the opening brief are granted. The opening brief is due May 17, 2022. The answering briefs are due June 16, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the last-served answering brief. [12439293] (ABT) [Entered: 05/05/2022 02:27 PM]

05/17/2022 13
43 pg, 546.31 KB Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Brittney Beck, Arianna Brown, Tierra Collier, Tawny Crane, Estate of Robert LaVoy Finicum, Challice Finch, D. Jeanette Finicum, Danielle Finicum, James Finicum, Mitch Finicum, Tean Finicum, Robert Finicum, Thomas Kinne and Thara Tenney. Date of service: 05/17/2022. [12449533] [22-35064] (Pierce, John) [Entered: 05/17/2022 05:45 PM]

05/17/2022 14
51 pg, 1.66 MB Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Brittney Beck, Arianna Brown, Tierra Collier, Tawny Crane, Estate of Robert LaVoy Finicum, Challice Finch, D. Jeanette Finicum, Danielle Finicum, James Finicum, Mitch Finicum, Robert Finicum, Tean Finicum, Thomas Kinne and Thara Tenney. Date of service: 05/17/2022. [12449534] [22-35064] (Pierce, John) [Entered: 05/17/2022 05:48 PM]

05/19/2022 15 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Peenesh H. Shah (Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301) for Appellees Katherine Brown, Oregon State Police and State of Oregon. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Denise Gale Fjordbeck for Appellees Katherine Brown, Oregon State Police and State of Oregon. Date of service: 05/19/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12451212] [22-35064] (Shah, Peenesh) [Entered: 05/19/2022 10:55 AM]

05/19/2022 16 Attorney Denise Gale Fjordbeck substituted by Attorney Peenesh Shah. [12451221] (RL) [Entered: 05/19/2022 10:58 AM]

05/19/2022 17
2 pg, 95.43 KB Filed clerk order: The opening brief [13] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [14] submitted by appellants are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12451253] (SML) [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:16 AM]

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 10:26 am
by Uninformed
Thanks muchly.

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 1:25 pm
by poplove
Thanks, Northland! I have been looking at the original case number and not the appeal case number. :doh:

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 1:47 pm
by pipistrelle
The one brick thing looks like a lectern, but the brick benches are turned in away as though you weren't expected to look at the speaker (who would be speaking?). I have no idea what's going on there. Brick doesn't seem appropriate for whatever it is but maybe that's all the grift could get. Where's the legendary Finicum logo?

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 2:13 pm
by RTH10260
pipistrelle wrote: Tue May 24, 2022 1:47 pm The one brick thing looks like a lectern, but the brick benches are turned in away as though you weren't expected to look at the speaker (who would be speaking?). I have no idea what's going on there. Brick doesn't seem appropriate for whatever it is but maybe that's all the grift could get. Where's the legendary Finicum logo?
The shed at the back, the outhouse structure?

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Thu May 26, 2022 8:15 am
by Baidn
Dr. Ken wrote: Sun May 22, 2022 1:04 pm
I think the lectern looking thing is supposed to be the housing for an "eternal flame" judging from the shoddy pipework that seems to be jutting out of it. All in all it honestly just looks like a pile of crap thrown together by people who didn't have an idea what they were doing or even going for. I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out it's scammers being scammed and the property owner is expecting rent for allowing that eyesore to be erected. Also wouldn't rule out whoever it is going "nope, nevermind" and having it torn down to use the fencing for something else

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Thu May 26, 2022 10:41 am
by LtDansLegs
That's what I was thinking, especially with a big steel beam down the center. I doubt there's a gas line handy and they're definitely not smart enough to know you can drill your own well, which means somebuddy is gonna have to change that propane tank a lot. :lol: I'll expect a fundraiser for that any day now. Maybe they think they can put plaques or signage on those taller brickworks, they're much too tall to be benches like the others.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Re: Finicum Lawsuit

Posted: Thu May 26, 2022 11:47 am
by RTH10260
Whatever will be on that pedestal, my guess it will be used for target practice..