Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
https://thefogbow.com/forum/
He wasn't the only one who noticed.Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 20, 2021 3:45 pmChilidog wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:59 amYou went there.Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 12:42 am.... It’s not even a stretch to believe KY is in SOMEONE’S bag
So I did. I wouldn’t have noticed if not for you. Thanks, chili.
Bill Berry?Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 1:36 am For the longest time, because I lived in DC, I thought Marion Berries were some kind of made up insult to the mayor’s tenure, not real fruit.
What are bilberries?
Also known as European blueberries, in the same genus as blueberries.Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 1:36 am For the longest time, because I lived in DC, I thought Marion Berries were some kind of made up insult to the mayor’s tenure, not real fruit.
What are bilberries?
Yes, essentially European blueberries. Not quite the same, but very similar.W. Kevin Vicklund wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:43 amAlso known as European blueberries, in the same genus as blueberries.Phoenix520 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 1:36 am For the longest time, because I lived in DC, I thought Marion Berries were some kind of made up insult to the mayor’s tenure, not real fruit.
What are bilberries?
When we're talking about berries in this topic we know the AZ Audit has been a colossal #FAIL.
And they are pointing out the grift:@MAGATodayMAGA Today (US Audit Watch), [19.10.21 20:44]
[Forwarded from MAGA Today (US Audit Watch)]
The Stupid Money on the Right Rides the Grift Train
"We either change course as a movement—in our funding, in our priorities, and in our actions—or we will lose.
...The question I have for donors, but even generally those on the Right is this (and if you’ve been paying attention, you know this is simply a yes/no question): do you think that the “Conservative Movement” as currently constructed, can actually defeat the Left and save this country? I’ll give you a hint: The answer is no. As in, not even close."
Read the full article here:
https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/18/the- ... ift-train/
Recently on the America Moment podcast, Michael Anton named names regarding Conservatism, Inc. The wide-ranging interview goes on for over an hour and a half, but the best clip is here in which Anton says,
Now I’ll name names. If you’re at National Review, AEI or Heritage Foundation, your job is to pretend to oppose but really support; your whole business model as staff and management collapses if you don’t do that. It’s an open question why the donors donate to these places. I actually believe they’re deceiving their donors for the most part; that is I’d like to believe most donors to Conservatism, Inc. (NRO, AEI, Heritage) are writing checks because they believe these guys are fighting bad leftists, socialists, Communists, America-haters, critical race theory. They’re standing athwart yelling ‘Stop!’ They really think this. They don’t think, ‘I’m writing this check so that Rich Lowry, Ramesh Ponnoru, Jonah Goldberg and other fat useless grifters can have six-figure jobs to do nothing but sell out my country and pretend that they’re saving it.’ I don’t think they’re doing that, but to be completely clear, that’s what they’re doing.
There’s a lot to unpack just in that one 60-second statement, but Anton is absolutely correct: The overwhelming majority of “conservative” donors, knowingly or unknowingly, are getting played by Conservatism, Inc., which is really about 90 percent of the so-called “conservative” think tanks in D.C. but, quite frankly, it happens even in the smaller ones across the country. I’ve been observing this phenomenon for over a decade, wondering what on earth people think they’re investing in because it can’t be effective work. Nice buildings, yes. Six and seven-figure salaries, yes. Self-validating echo chamber meetings? Yes. But work that impacts, truly impacts the direction this country is going in a positive way? Not at all; their work is barely noticeable, like cow flatulence on a windy day. I’ve written about this numerous times, here and here, and even spoken with Tucker Carlson about it as well.
orlylicious wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 4:00 pm
US Audit Watch on Telegram changed their name to MAGA Today (US Audit Watch), which sure shows confidence. They're hardly even talking about the audit, it's the border, let's go brandon, where's the military etc. Not really even good audit porn.
@MAGATodayMAGA Today (US Audit Watch), [19.10.21 20:44]
[Forwarded from MAGA Today (US Audit Watch)]
The Stupid Money on the Right Rides the Grift Train
"We either change course as a movement—in our funding, in our priorities, and in our actions—or we will lose.
...The question I have for donors, but even generally those on the Right is this (and if you’ve been paying attention, you know this is simply a yes/no question): do you think that the “Conservative Movement” as currently constructed, can actually defeat the Left and save this country? I’ll give you a hint: The answer is no. As in, not even close."
Read the full article here:
It's a Ned Ryun special. From the link:
Recently on the America Moment podcast, Michael Anton named names regarding Conservatism, Inc. The wide-ranging interview goes on for over an hour and a half, but the best clip is here in which Anton says,
Now I’ll name names. If you’re at National Review, AEI or Heritage Foundation, your job is to pretend to oppose but really support; your whole business model as staff and management collapses if you don’t do that. It’s an open question why the donors donate to these places. I actually believe they’re deceiving their donors for the most part; that is I’d like to believe most donors to Conservatism, Inc. (NRO, AEI, Heritage) are writing checks because they believe these guys are fighting bad leftists, socialists, Communists, America-haters, critical race theory. They’re standing athwart yelling ‘Stop!’ They really think this. They don’t think, ‘I’m writing this check so that Rich Lowry, Ramesh Ponnoru, Jonah Goldberg and other fat useless grifters can have six-figure jobs to do nothing but sell out my country and pretend that they’re saving it.’ I don’t think they’re doing that, but to be completely clear, that’s what they’re doing.
There’s a lot to unpack just in that one 60-second statement, but Anton is absolutely correct: The overwhelming majority of “conservative” donors, knowingly or unknowingly, are getting played by Conservatism, Inc., which is really about 90 percent of the so-called “conservative” think tanks in D.C. but, quite frankly, it happens even in the smaller ones across the country. I’ve been observing this phenomenon for over a decade, wondering what on earth people think they’re investing in because it can’t be effective work. Nice buildings, yes. Six and seven-figure salaries, yes. Self-validating echo chamber meetings? Yes. But work that impacts, truly impacts the direction this country is going in a positive way? Not at all; their work is barely noticeable, like cow flatulence on a windy day. I’ve written about this numerous times, here and here, and even spoken with Tucker Carlson about it as well.
Let's just take an easy example. Say Suzy Jones has parents that divorced. Not totally uncommon these days. Suzy's mom, Dinah, reverts to her maiden name, Dinah Smith. Also not uncommon. Suzy Jones heads off to college and files a ChangeOfAddress to forward her mail. She's still eligible to vote in AZ. There is no one left at the address with the same last name. CyberNinja flags this as fraud. It isn't. There are more situations they just skip over.On Twitter, the County suggested that the largest of our findings associated with a change in address was inaccurate
because it didn’t take into account college students, snowbirds, or military personnel. The County did not read the
report very carefully if it believes that college students and snowbirds could significantly impact these numbers. The
finding very clearly states that the address was checked after the documented move date and if anyone was still at the
residence with the same last name the voter ID was removed from the list. This should account for almost all situations
with college student and snowbirds.
Only REPUBLICAN subpoenas,Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Fri Oct 22, 2021 12:38 pm Wait!! NOW defying a subpoena is a serious crime and there are criminal liabilities?
If TFB ever needs a slogan to replace or supplement "Falsehoods unchallenged..." I might suggest the following:
Criminal sanctions are always a last resort. Compliance can be (and usually is) coerced through less extreme measures, like monetary sanctions. So lesser penalties are usually exhausted before opting for the greater penalties.Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Fri Oct 22, 2021 12:38 pm Wait!! NOW defying a subpoena is a serious crime and there are criminal liabilities?
► Show Spoiler
That would be just 4 steps, SC. We have proof that at least 8 steps are Chinese Communist Party forgeries with evidence of bamboo fibers, change of fonts, inconsistent folding and traces of hoisin sauce.Slim Cognito wrote: ↑Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:47 pm I think I may need a 12 step program for my audit porn addiction.
No...you got it under controlSlim Cognito wrote: ↑Sat Oct 23, 2021 9:47 pm I think I may need a 12 step program for my audit porn addiction.
