Alina Habba
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2024 1:21 pm
She's a moron. ![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
It's actually so easy I can do it; it doesn't surprise me that she can't.northland10 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 1:48 pm![]()
I don't have much avocado cutting experience so I would likely mess it up. The big difference?
I WOULDN'T RECORD IT AND PUT IT ONLINE!!!
The advantage to not being a narcissist and having some sense of shame.
I wonder if she misspoke and there would be 81 law suites, but just for what at this point during primaries time?bill_g wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 12:41 pm Alina misstating the States.
Or!
She's telegraphing a massive colonization program if T returns to office.
https://twitter.com/DNCWarRoom/status/1 ... 4638226519DNC War Room@DNCWarRoom
RNC co-Chair Lara Trump: We have lawsuits in 81 states right now
0:09 / 0:09
4:19 PM · Apr 24, 2024
To openly suggest to their base that they are mounting not just a defense, but a vigorous and energetic offense. They want to appear to be a steamroller pushing back as relentlessly as they have characterized all the charges brought against him.
Crush of lawsuits over voting in multiple states creates a shadow war for the 2024 election
by: CHRISTINE FERNANDO, Associated Press
Posted: Apr 21, 2024 / 09:48 AM EDT Updated: Apr 21, 2024 / 09:51 AM EDT
CHICAGO (AP) — As President Joe Biden and Donald Trump step up their campaigning in swing states, a quieter battle is taking place in the shadows of their White House rematch.
The Republican National Committee, newly reconstituted under Trump, has filed election-related lawsuits in nearly half the states. Recent lawsuits over voter roll maintenance in Michigan and Nevada are part of a larger strategy targeting various aspects of voting and election administration.
It’s not a new strategy. But with recent internal changes at the RNC and added pressure from the former president, the legal maneuvering is expected to play an increasingly significant role for the party as Election Day in November approaches. The lawsuits are useful for campaign messaging, fundraising and raising doubts about the validity of the election.
Danielle Alvarez, a senior adviser to the RNC and the Trump campaign, said the lawsuits were one of the organization’s main priorities this year.
“This is something that’s very important to President Trump,” she said. “He has said that this is something the RNC should do year-round.”
Democrats and legal experts are warning about how the lawsuits might overwhelm election officials and undermine voter confidence in the the results of the balloting.
https://www.localsyr.com/news/your-loca ... -election/
You know, by removing the avocado from that toast, you could have sent a kid to college, or something. I stop listening to social media budgeting coaches the moment the word avocado becomes part of the discourse, so I could be wrong on my grasp of their theory.
This may be one reason why I am resistant to watching videos. It becomes too much about the host and not enough about the actual subject.
The other one that drives me nuts is the dude with the huge Buddy Holly glasses who does a lot of the SovCit videos. I have given up on watching his stuff for the same reason. Lots of words but no value added.northland10 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:12 pmThis may be one reason why I am resistant to watching videos. It becomes too much about the host and not enough about the actual subject.
YouTube videos, unlike actual television productions, don't have to consider how to create a usable narrative in a specific timeframe, so they go on or add way more commentary than is needed.
It's like church announcements where folks go on and on and on, and you have forgotten the original announcement. Announcements should never be longer than the sermon (and yet, I have seen it).
Yeah that guy is annoying, he thinks he needs to stop the video and dunk on them. Unfortunately, he will keep doing this because he has an audience who likes that stuff. I don't mind the ones like Law Talk With Mike because his are more like a streaming format and he actually gives good perspective about court procedures.Ben-Prime wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:19 amThe other one that drives me nuts is the dude with the huge Buddy Holly glasses who does a lot of the SovCit videos. I have given up on watching his stuff for the same reason. Lots of words but no value added.northland10 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:12 pmThis may be one reason why I am resistant to watching videos. It becomes too much about the host and not enough about the actual subject.
YouTube videos, unlike actual television productions, don't have to consider how to create a usable narrative in a specific timeframe, so they go on or add way more commentary than is needed.
It's like church announcements where folks go on and on and on, and you have forgotten the original announcement. Announcements should never be longer than the sermon (and yet, I have seen it).
Acyn @Acyn wrote: Habba: Somehow, Judge Merchan randomly gets Donald Trump. That's not the way that the system works. You assign a case randomly, that's the way it’s supposed to work.
Too also: judgeships are political in nature. Almost every judge has some degree of partisanship in their background. Because that's how they became judges.pipistrelle wrote: ↑Wed May 22, 2024 1:46 pm He got Merchan randomly, but was supposed to get a judge randomly?