Page 8 of 65

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 5:54 pm
by New Turtle
CNN cut away from Cruz's portion, for the most part.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 5:56 pm
by Lani
I can only watch for a few minutes. Then I take breaks to :brickwallsmall: and eat chocolate (not Nestle).

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 6:01 pm
by raison de arizona
New Turtle wrote: Tue Mar 22, 2022 5:54 pm CNN cut away from Cruz's portion, for the most part.
God bless them, Hawley is pretty trash too also.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 6:59 pm
by W. Kevin Vicklund
I heard part of Hawley's harangue. I hope his cleaning crew is wearing gloves when they clean up the mess of tissues he's left scattered around his desk. :sick:

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 7:00 pm
by sad-cafe
anyone have vidoe of lady g running his hissy fit?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 7:06 pm
by raison de arizona
sad-cafe wrote: Tue Mar 22, 2022 7:00 pm anyone have vidoe of lady g running his hissy fit?
This is a good one:


"Rate your faith on a scale of one to ten." Bonus butthurt over Barrett.
► Show Spoiler
I don't even know what this is:
► Show Spoiler
Now it's Tom Cotton's turn to act like an a-hole.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 7:16 pm
by filly
Props to any of you with the stomach to watch this stuff. I've been dipping in and out, much on the radio. The GQP Senators beclowning themselves is so ridiculous and transparent.

No idea if this is true, but on Lawrence O'Donnell's show last night he said there were no hearings on Supreme Court nominees until Louis Brandeis was nominated. Wonder why?

It's just disgusting. /fini

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 7:21 pm
by Tiredretiredlawyer
I can't watch either. :talktothehand:

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 8:26 pm
by AndyinPA
Going in and out, too, and didn't see Graham.

:explode:

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 10:11 pm
by Lani
AndyinPA wrote: Tue Mar 22, 2022 8:26 pm Going in and out, too, and didn't see Graham.

:explode:
I'm just checking in, watching briefly. Scream at tv. Lots of racist questions and complaints.

:explode:

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 1:55 am
by poplove
I watched some of the questioning. I love Cory Booker and how he treated her.



The highlights if you don't watch the video: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/2 ... g-00019507

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 9:22 am
by Dr. Ken
What century are we in?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 9:31 am
by Kriselda Gray
raison de arizona wrote: Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:28 pm
Asked of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson:
Blackburn: Is it your personal hidden agenda to incorporate CRT into our legal system?
What a stupid question. First, it's extremely insulting, but then there's the issue of asking someone what their "HIDDEN" agenda is. Do you really think a smart candidate is going to say "Ooops, ya caught me. Yep, I have a hidden agenda!" FFS! She could have just asked "Do you believe CRT should be incorporated into our legal system?" but the she wouldn't get points for owning a lib, and getting to spread a nasty accusation, would she?

I really, really hate Republicans.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:02 am
by AndyinPA
It wouldn't make it as good a soundbite for faux noise, etc.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:54 am
by Suranis
Ya, if you just view the questions as elbowing one another and auditioning for tonight's 20 second highlight spot on FOX News, the questions are perfectly logical.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:51 pm
by filly
I would dislike being a Supreme Court Justice. I would hate being a Justice on *this* Court. Here you have a beyond exemplary nominee and they put her through all of this bullshit because she’s a black woman and for purposes of political theater.

I guess there will be good people who still aspire to this but how many good people won’t?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 1:03 pm
by MN-Skeptic
filly wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:51 pm I would dislike being a Supreme Court Justice. I would hate being a Justice on *this* Court. Here you have a beyond exemplary nominee and they put her through all of this bullshit because she’s a black woman and for purposes of political theater.

I guess there will be good people who still aspire to this but how many good people won’t?
Thankfully there will always be a slew of excellent candidates available. Moreover, just because the court is royally screwed up when you are nominated does not mean that the balance won't change during your tenure to one that better reflects your opinions. Hopefully Judge Jackson will be a Supreme Court Justice for decades.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 1:22 pm
by Atticus Finch
Dr. Ken wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 9:22 am What century are we in?
Reporter: Youu would be okay with the Supreme Court leaving the issue of segregation in public schools to the states?


SEN. MIKE BRAUN (R-IN): "Yes. If you are not wanting the Supreme Court to weigh in on issues like that, you are not going to be able to have your cake and eat it too."

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 1:58 pm
by Phoenix520
I know she dare not talk back to any of the slugs who have insulted her, but I’d love to hear someone say, on her behalf

“Senator Qruz, all these Questions about my views on pedophilia…is it your hidden agenda to brand all Democrats with a scarlet P, as red meat to your base base?”

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:47 pm
by filly

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:51 pm
by filly
MN-Skeptic wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 1:03 pm
filly wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:51 pm I would dislike being a Supreme Court Justice. I would hate being a Justice on *this* Court. Here you have a beyond exemplary nominee and they put her through all of this bullshit because she’s a black woman and for purposes of political theater.

I guess there will be good people who still aspire to this but how many good people won’t?
Thankfully there will always be a slew of excellent candidates available. Moreover, just because the court is royally screwed up when you are nominated does not mean that the balance won't change during your tenure to one that better reflects your opinions. Hopefully Judge Jackson will be a Supreme Court Justice for decades.
Decades will not be enough to see this Court change because voting rights are being gutted and gerrymandering continues. See what the Court pulled just today on the shadow docket re: Wisconsin. As long as the GQP controls those levers of power there will be more Alitos Kavenaughs, Gorsuchs etc.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:52 pm
by raison de arizona
JFC just cut his mike.


Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 5:06 pm
by Volkonski
Cruz says he is Hispanic but would it be OK if he identified himself as Asian.

Actually yes. He can convert to Buddhism, eat Asian cuisine, learn Asian languages, read Asian literature, attend Asian cultural events. He can be as Asian as he likes.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 5:12 pm
by sugar magnolia
Image

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 5:13 pm
by raison de arizona
:rotflmao: