Fogbow

scirreeve wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 12:30 am Paul - Kenneth: House of Cromar weighs in. Loy says his case is stronger cuz Raland lost or something. Capture.JPG

RTH10260 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 6:50 am "held without action"

Rayland Brunson wrote:Plan D
In order for us to move our brother Loy's case to the Supreme Court, we need to move it to the appellate court. It was two years ago (April 1, 2021) that Loy first paid the filing fee to have his complaint filed in the Federal Court. Loy gave them the filing fee, but they didn't file it. They actually accepted the filing fee but held onto the complaint without filing it. I mean, what the heck? We kept asking the court to file it but were told they were busy and would get around to doing it when they can. Now, let me explain. When new cases are filed, the court files it the moment they accept the filing fee, or at least within a day or two, but not this case. They just refused to file it. So, we waited... a few months we waited. That's when we decided to go to a higher court asking them to tell the Federal Court to get on it! The higher court told us not to worry about it and that the Utah Federal Court would get around to it when they can. So we decided to have Loy go to his local district court and file a complaint against the Federal Court, hoping that this will compel the Federal Court to do their job. The Defendant (Federal Court), in response to this complaint told the judge that they aren't refusing to file it, but that they are simply just too busy and will get around to it when they can. The judge sided with them. In response, we filed a motion for reconsideration asking the judge to compel the Federal Court to file Loy's complaint! The judge refused. We did this four times, asking the judge to compel the Federal Court to file his case. 4 times the District Judge told Loy "no". Now, in the middle of wondering what to do about all of this, and feeling at a loss for strategy, low and behold to our amusement, amazement and profound baffling bewilderment, the Federal Court, out-of-the-blue, decided to finally file Loy's case (which they ordered to have dismissed just recently). So, yesterday we had Loy file a "Notice of Appeal" to the Federal Court, letting them know that we are going to move Loy's case to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (the Appellate Court). The plan is that as soon as it's filed in the appellate court, we are going to do a Rule 11 and move it to the Supreme Court. It will take several days, up to a couple of weeks for this to be officially filed in the Court of Appeals.

Now let me address the subject of the 2.9 billion dollars that we are asking for. I want to address this because there have been so many people wondering what this is all about. So let me be clear. First of all the whole idea of us getting any of that is not going to happen. Even if we do get a hearing, and we prevail, and the Justices actually sign the order, we are still not going to see a dime of that. We knew this from the beginning. Why? The members of congress (especially the president) currently have solid asset protection plans which are designed to make it impossible for anyone to collect anything for any reason (Obama, for example, when he created this odd multi trillion dollar stimulation plan, and threw money at corporations, which caused so many of us to wonder how much of that he ended up with). Anyway, we put in the 2.9 billion dollar relief for damages in order to show the seriousness of these allegations which are listed in the complaint. Our goal and intention of this lawsuit is to have all the defendants be removed from office, and that the words "under penalty of perjury" be added at the end of the Oath of Office, making it binding, making the penalty (as outlined in 18 USC) enforceable. Do you think this will happen? Maybe not, maybe so, but in the meanwhile, the US Supreme Court is getting more and more letters and affidavits letting them know that this is about "We The People" and not just about 4 brothers who want their freedom protected, because the Justices at any time can still decide to grant my petition for a hearing. I will post any new developments.

The Office of Legal Counsel is getting a ton of letters. They know all about us.

Rule 11. Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals Before Judgment

A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U. S. C.
§ 2101(e).

northland10 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:21 pmIf it were to actually happen, it would shorten the grifting time.

bob wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:26 pm

northland10 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:21 pmIf it were to actually happen, it would shorten the grifting time.

Yes, but many of their marks get excited by SCOTUS, as if throwing paper at it is an accomplishment or indication.

So it would be a volume versus duration grift.

bob wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 7:21 pm

Rayland Brunson wrote:Plan D
In order for us to move our brother Loy's case to the Supreme Court, we need to move it to the appellate court.

scirreeve wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 1:22 am Checked the Brunson Bros fan page and nothing about this but no posts since April Fool's Day. Something about rupees vs. $ there. I am sure it is stupid but I didn't read the whole stoopid post. Capture.JPG

orlylicious wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:07 pm
Hoaxium, I like it too also!