Page 7 of 116
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 11:44 am
by Suranis
It took them HOW LONG to think of that???
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 12:47 pm
by Suranis
Actually, I have had an inspired thought about what happened.
"Nunes: But boss you have to Post on Truth if we are to be a success!
Drump: Ya ya did you see the hole in one I made...
Nunes: But most excellent and brainy one, if you post on Truth we can copy it to Twitter and everyone will love you again...
Drump: Brilliant, I'm so glad I thought of that!"
Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 12:48 pm
by RTH10260
How long until Twitter blocks this fresh account, "made in the name of the former guy"?
How many copycats will pop up and claim to post in the name of someone else, like a person with initials DJT
Re: Twitter
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 11:47 am
by Estiveo
Estiveoshot_20220518_084554.jpg
Re: Twitter
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 11:50 am
by AndyinPA
That didn't last long.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 3:19 pm
by RTH10260
Re: Twitter
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 5:22 pm
by MN-Skeptic
As a reminder, Elon Musk's purchase price for each Twitter share is $54.20.
Twitter stock closed at $36.85 today.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 6:22 pm
by Volkonski
Twitter investors think that Musk will weasel out of his offer.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 6:23 pm
by Volkonski
Re: Twitter
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 6:32 pm
by keith
sugar magnolia wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 8:58 am
TX doesn't seem to mind making IG shut out TX users, though.
If you’re from Texas or Illinois and love to apply Instagram filters to the photos of your travels or any other event, this may be bad news for you. After being sued by Texas for violating the state’s privacy protection for personal biometric data in February, Meta, the parent organization of Facebook and Instagram, started on Wednesday (May 11) to disable the use of certain Instagram filters in Texas. The lawsuit was filed by Attorney General Ken Paxton. Meta is doing the same procedures in the state of Illinois.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/meta-no-more ... 07015.html
In Australia, facebook, now meta, shut down Government pages on health care and other vital services over access to news content legislation.
They said it was an accident, but internal documentationshows it was policy.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 11:58 am
by Chilidog
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 1:53 pm
by Slim Cognito
change approved.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 6:48 pm
by Estiveo
For those expecting something negative about Elon to drop any day now...
Re: Twitter
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 7:35 pm
by raison de arizona
The bird site was right! Now he can just blame it on those dirty Dems.
Edit:
Ah, right on cue!
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 6:58 am
by tek
"a lot more to this story"
Uh huh. That sounds like "what I did was perfectly fine."
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 12:01 pm
by raison de arizona
Musk publicly challenged his accuser to describe his junk. Yep, you read that right.
Also, there are a number of articles floating around quoting Twitter as saying putting a deal "on hold" isn't a thing, and that they have a committed deal with an agreed upon price and that they are holding Musk to it and he better get his financing house in order.
This whole mess may end costing Musk billions in Tesla stock, his reputation, AND a billion dollar breakup fee to get out of the Twitter deal.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 5:59 pm
by bob
Bonus:
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 6:08 pm
by raison de arizona
I find it hard to believe that Tesla doesn't already have a legal department with all the times they have been sued.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 6:16 pm
by bob
raison de arizona wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 6:08 pm
I find it hard to believe that Tesla doesn't already have a legal department with all the times they have been sued.
Musk is assembling a
hardcore litigation department;
in addition to its easy-mode department.
For
his Tesla's litigation-as-combat needs.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 6:19 pm
by raison de arizona
bob wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 6:16 pm
raison de arizona wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 6:08 pm
I find it hard to believe that Tesla doesn't already have a legal department with all the times they have been sued.
Musk is assembling a
hardcore litigation department;
in addition to its easy-mode department.
For
his Tesla's litigation-as-combat needs.
I'm sure all his current lawyers are quite thrilled to find out he needs to supplement them with a
hardcore litigation department!
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 6:52 pm
by raison de arizona
It will be bad if this man-child gets control of Twitter.
- Screen Shot 2022-05-20 at 3.50.52 PM.png (142.66 KiB) Viewed 1097 times
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1527757119239380993
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 6:54 pm
by sugar magnolia
Do grown men actually call it a wiener?
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 7:40 pm
by raison de arizona
sugar magnolia wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 6:54 pm
Do grown men actually call it a wiener?
No. Also:
Gabe Sanchez @iamgabesanchez wrote:
Elon Musk's net worth has fallen over $49B since he first offered to buy Twitter for $44B.
That is all.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 7:49 pm
by pipistrelle
bob wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 6:16 pm
raison de arizona wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 6:08 pm
I find it hard to believe that Tesla doesn't already have a legal department with all the times they have been sued.
Musk is assembling a
hardcore litigation department;
in addition to its easy-mode department.
For
his Tesla's litigation-as-combat needs.
I think this legal department is à la Mike Lindell.
Re: Twitter
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 7:58 pm
by raison de arizona
pipistrelle wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 7:49 pm
bob wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 6:16 pm
raison de arizona wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 6:08 pm
I find it hard to believe that Tesla doesn't already have a legal department with all the times they have been sued.
Musk is assembling a
hardcore litigation department;
in addition to its easy-mode department.
For
his Tesla's litigation-as-combat needs.
I think this legal department is à la Mike Lindell.
You may be on to something. I've seen speculation that Musk shopped his plans around to real lawyer firms and was roundly turned down, thus rolling his own.
