Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
https://thefogbow.com/forum/
I concur, Tayler's appearance on Deadline WH was reupped this afternoon on MSNCBHe’s referring to Taylor, not Kelly, in that whine.
Are we sure he wrote the former? He spelled 'stolen' correctly.raison de arizona wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 1:17 am Someone had himself a wee little meltdown.
On election interference.On Alvin Bragg.► Show Spoiler► Show Spoiler
Residents push for renaming of Trump Plaza to disassociate from ex-president
Tenants of the high-rise in New Rochelle, New York, want to abandon the name which has at times affected real estate value
Adam Gabbatt
Sun 21 Apr 2024 12.00 CEST
While Donald Trump endures the ignominy of being the first former US president to face criminal trial, there is further humiliation brewing, with a movement to strip the Trump name from a building in his home state.
Residents at Trump Plaza, a 40-story high-rise in the suburban New York city of New Rochelle, are pushing for the building to be renamed and to escape a near-two decade association with the legally-troubled ex-president and real estate mogul.
It would follow the slew of buildings in New York City and elsewhere that have abandoned the Trump name since he entered politics, as Trump has become a divisive, much-loathed figure by liberals even as he is loved by his fans.
Donald Trump outside court
Trump’s criminal hush-money trial concludes jury selection after difficulties
Read more
Owners of Trump Plaza apartments – there are 194 units – are in the middle of a vote which would further erase Trump’s name – something which would not just have implications for the people who live in the building.
Trump Plaza is located in the center of New Rochelle, a couple of blocks from restaurants and the local movie theater. Renaming the building would spare residents and workers in this racially diverse city of 80,000 people from encountering, at least visually, the Trump name.
Some people would be pleased with that.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... tate-value
What, you expect him to actually read the things he posts?Acyn @Acyn wrote: Trump complains he can’t read his printouts of articles
Njet, but the articles mentioning his name that his aid would forward to him on that bluetooth connected mobile printerraison de arizona wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 2:22 pm And the worst part is, I never learned to read!
https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1782836752320983526What, you expect him to actually read the things he posts?Acyn @Acyn wrote: Trump complains he can’t read his printouts of articles
Mike Sington @MikeSington wrote: Donald Trump welcomes Japan’s former Prime Minister Taro Aso to Trump Tower, and presents him with what appears to be a “key” to the White House. Not sure what gives him the right to do this. Probably Citizen Trump once again pretending to be President.
Donald Trump‘s inner circle doesn’t expect the Supreme Court to go along with his extreme arguments about executive power in the immunity case before the justices. But what the high court does now is almost beside the point: Trump already won.
Three people with direct knowledge of the matter tell Rolling Stone that many of the former president’s lawyers and political advisers have already accepted that the justices will likely rule against him, and reject his claims to expansive presidential immunity in perpetuity. Bringing the case before the court — after a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., shut down their arguments on executive power — was a delaying tactic designed to push Trump’s criminal election subversion trial past Election Day this fall. The strategy paid off so much more than MAGAworld anticipated.
“We already pulled off the heist,” says a source close to Trump, noting it doesn’t matter to them what the Supreme Court decides now.
Matthew Gertz @MattGertz wrote: Donald Trump's lawyer is effectively arguing before the Supreme Court that there is no legal recourse if Joe Biden orders the military to kill his client.
Except the conservatives don't seem to believe that anything a President does as long as (s)he is in office could possibly BE private conduct.Rolodex wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:27 pm As I saw Joyce Vance argue, the justices need to be presented with a hypothetical where a president decides he doesn't like the decision of certain Supreme Court Justices and orders them to be arrested - or even assassinated because they are "enemies of America." Bring it home for them.
I listening and they are getting deep in the weeds and seems like the justices are looking for a narrow ruling. A lot of talk about distinguishing between "official acts" and "private conduct."