Falsehoods Unchallenged Only Fester and Grow
https://thefogbow.com/forum/
I kind of want "Suing for Treason" to be the name of Orly's biography, tho.
Even this IANAL knows that one.
Any human with two brain cells to rub together knows that Orly isn't a competant anything.
Hardly any posts about her. She, Orly Taitz, the Queen of the Birthers, America's Sweetheart, the Joan of Arc of Eligibility. Foggy used to make a fortune on all the ads and sponsorships placed around Orly's name. 
Now she's reduced to state-paid dental work and cleanings for migrants who may not even understand the long, long stories she tells them about Obama and Bournel while they're in the dental chair.FIFYhumblescribe wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 3:52 pm Orly,
Repeat after me: Attorneys General. Attorneys General.
This is a good example of the postpositive. While rare in English, it does occur. Other examples include:
Court-martial (plural courts-martial.)
Battle royal (plural battles royal.)
Solicitor general
Matters important (used in this sense as anastrophe for effect.)
Damn those pesky hyphens! (I knew that but forgot when I was typing!)Maybenaut wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 10:01 amFIFYhumblescribe wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 3:52 pm Orly,
Repeat after me: Attorneys General. Attorneys General.
This is a good example of the postpositive. While rare in English, it does occur. Other examples include:
Court-martial (plural courts-martial.)
Battle royal (plural battles royal.)
Solicitor general
Matters important (used in this sense as anastrophe for effect.)
If I didn’t type it every damn day since 2003 I probably wouldn’t have remembered either.humblescribe wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 4:24 pm
Damn those pesky hyphens! (I knew that but forgot when I was typing!)
Don't know truthfully. Common sense would say no, however, particularly with speech. It would be ambiguous to say attorney's [attorneys] general massive lawsuit against the former president and not know if it is the possessive or plural postpositive. So, the adjective gets the inflectional morpheme by default.Reddog wrote: ↑Fri Sep 23, 2022 2:18 pm That all makes sense, now. I admit I never really noticed before, but was reading through news this morning and noticed in the lede to the article talking about the
“… New York Attorney General's massive lawsuit against the former president. “
The postpositive applies to possessive as well as plural, correct?
No, for Jan, it's Court Marcia Marcia Marcia.
Notice to McConnell of a possible legal action for fraud due to diversion of funds from GOP candidates battling Democrats in favor of Murkowski battling fellow Republican
Notice of a possible legal action for fraud and misrepresentation to be brought by the donors of the Republican Senate Leadership Fund whose donations were taken from Republican candidates Blake Masters in Arizona and Don Bolduc in New Hampshire who are challenging Democrats, and were wrongfully given to Lisa Murkowski running against a fellow Republican in Alaska
Recently, it was reported by Breitbart.com, New York Times as well as Sunday Futures with Maria Bartiromo on Fox News that you have withdrawn some $6 million in funds from Senate Leadership Fund, that were earmarked for advertising for Blake Masters in Arizona and some $4.5 million from Don Bolduc in New Hampshire and gave these funds to Lisa Murkowski, who is currently running against a fellow Republican in Alaska.
Please be advised, Republican donors have given donations to the Senate Leadership fund so that those funds will be used to fight Democrats, not fellow Republicans. The state of Alaska has a peculiar rule where the top two primary candidates regardless of party affiliation spare off in the general election. Lisa Murkowski is currently facing a fellow Republican, an amazing candidate, Kelly Tshibaka. Regardless of which one of them wins, GOP will have the Alaska senate seat. Ms. Tshibaka is a reliable Republican, seeking to improve the economy, secure the borders, fight crime, all of the goals and principles of the Republican party. Ms. Tshibaka is a brilliant Yale Law graduate, held high level positions in the Department of Justice and in the state of Alaska, she is married to a fellow Yale Law graduate, an accomplished African-American man and has five beautiful children. It is unconscionable, immoral and likely fraudulent, to take over 9 million dollars earmarked for other Republican candidates fighting Democrats in other states and give them to Murkowski to fight this amazing Republican candidate.
You might have had some justification in supporting some Republican candidates fighting fellow Republicans in the primaries, claiming that they might be stronger candidates in general election, however you have no justification in giving money to one Republican to fight another Republican in the general election. It appears , you are not following the will of the donors and are engaged in self dealing, seeking to support the candidates who support you personally as the Republican senate leader.
Mr. McConnell, the donors sought to benefit the Republican party, not you personally, further, at the age of 80, nearly 81, you might consider transferring your position of the senate Republican leader to a younger Republican senator, who is more in tune with the voters and donors. Regardless, you have a duty to follow the will of the donors, not to defraud them, not to engage in self dealing, not to support the candidates based on their allegiance to you personally, but based on their party affiliation, and in order to secure the Republican majority.
Both Blake Masters in Arizona and Brigadier General Don Bolduc in New Hampshire are amazing candidates with a real chance of becoming US senators. Masters is a strong Republican, Stanford educated attorney, successful High Tech executive, a husband and a father of three beautiful children. Recent polls show him tied or in a statistical tie with Mark Kelly in Arizona. Republican candidate for governor in Arizona is currently ahead and her lead will help Masters to secure the lead. Masters needs those funds in the last two and a half weeks of the election cycle to secure the victory.
General Bolduc is a strong Republican, he is a decorated US Army general and an amazing candidate. Recent Fabrizio poll show him only 2% behind in a poll with 4% margin of error, which means he is in a statistical tie. This is consistent with a prior Trafalgar poll showing him in a statistical tie. Republican governor of New Hampshire is leading, which will help him. Bolduc desperately needs those funds to win the election. Currently, according to the New York Times, Democrat Maggie Hassan started October with $4.8 million, while Bolduc has only $800,000. He is $4 million short to be to par with the Democrat in the advertising funding. The money that was originally ear marked and taken to benefit Murkowski, need to be returned to him.
Mr. McConnell, I strongly urge you to return to Bolduc and Masters the funds and avoid a potential legal action by the donors for fraud, misrepresentation and self dealing.
Further, I strongly urge to check whether there are shenanigans going on with WinRed.com, to see whether there is a sabotage in credit card acceptance platform, specifically in relation to donations to General Bolduc.
Due to the fact that you took the funds from Bolduc, I decided to give the maximum allowable donation to his campaign. Since I previously gave $100 and the maximum is $2,900, I decided to donate $2,800. I got a message that my card was declined, even though the card was not declined before, I checked it and the card was fine. I entered another card and got a message that the donation could not go through because the zip code was “insufficient”. I clearly know my zip code and it was correct and sufficient. So, in spite of that message, I clicked the button to donate and it went through. I am greatly concerned that there might be a sabotage of the credit card donations platform, to prevent General Bolduc from getting donations only because he does not support you personally to continue as the Republican senate leader.
I urge you to check the platform to make sure that this amazing Republican candidate is not sabotaged and his campaign is not starved by lack of donations.
In summary, it is your moral obligation and legal duty to comply with the will of the donors and not to defraud them and return the funds taken from Republican Candidates Bolduc in New Hampshire and Masters in Arizona and stop financing the attacks by Murkowski against the fellow Republican Kelly Tshibaka in Alaska.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/notice-to-m ... epublican/ DrConspiracy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 3:42 am Orly donates to candidate Don Bolduc in New Hampshire.
https://americanindependent.com/don-bol ... orly-taitz
americanindependent.com wrote: Don Bolduc accepted a large donation on Saturday from Orly Taitz, a fellow conspiracy theorist
Abortion rights stopped the red wave. It is imperative that GOP runs candidates that allow women to terminate pregnancies early on, in the first trimester or GOP will be crushed in the future elections, De Santis will not become the president in the future if he passes 6 weeks ban
This year was the best opportunity for the GOP to gain large number of seats in the House and the senate. The inflation is rampant, high crime, millions of illegals invaded the country, fentanyl deaths, yet GOP barely gained enough for the majority in the House and it is a big question mark whether it can take the senate. What happened? Reversal of Roe v Wade and the fight for Abortion rights. Most people in this country believe that women should have a right to terminate an unplanned pregnancy in the first trimester, or first 13 weeks or up to 15 weeks. 69% of unmarried women voted for the Democrats. 63% of young people, 18-30 years old voted for the Democrats. As time goes by, these young people will get older and would still support those abortion rights with some limitations, such as 13-15 weeks.
It is time for the GOP leadership to face this reality and support the candidates who support limited rights for abortion, up to 15 weeks.
If GOP continues running candidates who support complete bans on abortion or very harsh 6 weeks bans, these candidates would have a very hard time winning future races and particularly the most important race for presidency.
Ron De Santis is considered to be a rising star in the GOP. Currently, Florida has a reasonable limitation on abortion, 15 weeks and 6 days. However, De Santis is said to contemplate a 6 week ban on abortion in Florida. If he does that, he will have an extremely hard time getting elected the US president, probably will get defeated, as women consider this ban to be too harsh. If De Santis passes 6 weeks abortion ban in Florida and runs for president, he will have an extremely hard time winning swing states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan. It is time for the GOP to wake up and respond to the will of the voters on this issue. In the future economy might not be that bad, inflation will go down, it will be harder for the GOP to win, and if GOP does not run candidates who support some limited abortions, they will be crushed in future elections.Edward wrote:So principles be damned and just change them to get elected?Taitz wrote:people have different principles. Some have principles that in the first trimester the fetus is the size of a bean, not formed yet and a woman should have a right to terminate this pregnancy
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/abortion-ri ... -election/ withAbortion rights stopped the red wave. It is imperative that GOP runs candidates that allow women to terminate pregnancies early on, in the first trimester or GOP will be crushed in the future elections, De Santis will not become the president in the future if he passes 6 weeks ban
Something is very wrong. There was a shift of 12 million votes from Dem winning margin in 2020 to GOP winning margin in 2022, yet GOP lost a senate seat and barely added 10 seats in the House. I hope every losing swing state candidate for senate and House files legal challenges and demands an audit of authenticity and chain of custody of ballots. We don’t know from where many of the ballots came from
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/something-i ... se-i-hope/ You sure that was her? I didn't see the eyelashes.jemcanada2 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 10, 2022 6:17 pm Does anyone remember when Orly went shopping at Ikea?
It’s been ten years since the intrepid esquire was spotted shopping at Ikea in Toronto.
https://apple.news/AlqHrImpDSg6b55hB3inHJQ
Have to have 2 million potential buyers before we can get one. One store, Haul2HI, has an Ikea showroom and catalogs, and it arranges for shipping and delivering items on Oahu. 