Which Trump will get indicted first?

#1

Taking bets now. Winners' names will be compiled and embroidered on decorative throw pillows*.

If multiple Trumps are indicted simultaneously, as long as you picked one of them you are a winner!

*if you are a winner and take it upon yourself to embroider your own name on a decorative throw pillow.

And what is with the decorative throw pillows? They are taking over my house.

W. Kevin Vicklund · #2

Do the decorative throw pillows come with little parachutes?

#3

Tough choice! In the same monologue on Jimmy Kimmel as a Mike Lindell bit, Jimmy talks about this and his vote seems to be for Eric

Cued up:

Dave from down under · #4

The fatuous four should be indicted..

But my bet is with none.. unfortunately

Maybenaut · #5

I also voted none.

#6

I went with none. Always a safe bet with that family.

Gene Kooper · #7

I voted for Jr only because at some point he will really fuck things up and get arrested and charged with cocaine possession. He'll end up in rehab and get probation at worst; definitely no jail time.

#8

Don Jr., but I wish it would be Trump himself.

#9

I voted for Jared just because no one else did

Slim Cognito · #10

I'm probably setting myself up for disappointment but I went with jr, if he doesn't OD first.

Reality Check · #11

I voted for Ivanka because if it happened first it just might give the OSG the big one.

#12

Reality Check wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 9:38 am I voted for Ivanka because if it happened first it just might give the OSG the big one.

Unassailable logic. I voted for Ivanka based on this sound and reasonable argument.

Frater I*I · #13

MsDaisy wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:53 am I voted for Jared just because no one else did

I did as well, if I was a prosecutor I'd lean on him first, because he'd no doubt buckle like a belt and give up the whole family to save his own ass...

#14

Tiredretiredlawyer wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 10:07 am
Reality Check wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 9:38 am I voted for Ivanka because if it happened first it just might give the OSG the big one.
Unassailable logic. I voted for Ivanka based on this sound and reasonable argument.

Ditto!

#15

I voted nobody.

I cannot see how indicting any of these a$$hats under Biden's administration would accomplish anything other than more RWNJ and certain Rethuglican politicians spinning the indictments out of control. You think the Kyle Rittenhouses of the country would stand for that?

TFG would be a virtual shoo-in for the '24 nomination if this were to happen.

Be careful what you wish for.

bob · #16

humblescribe wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 2:51 pmI cannot see how indicting any of these a$$hats under Biden's administration would accomplish anything other than more RWNJ and certain Rethuglican politicians spinning the indictments out of control.

Biden is not the only person with the power to indict. (Technically, even Biden can't indict, but his people can.)

So while your political analysis may be correct, there are more people (with actual authority) who may disagree.

Dave from down under · #17

Just think how the

If Biden mooted Pardoning any of the 4 if they underbussed the other three…

LM K · #18

I voted none.

But ....

If someone is indicted, please let it be Ivanka.

Chilidog · #19

A better question is... Which Trump is going to try to save themselves by throwing the others under the bus first...

My money is on Ivanka.

noblepa · #20

I suspect that all of us here would like to see them all indicted.

I am not confident that any of them will be, but if they are, TFG will not be the first.

First of all, indicting a former President is unprecedented, no matter how much he deserves it. So I think that prosecutors will tread carefully and make sure that all their ducks are in a row before taking such a step. Its a little like hunting a lion or grizzly bear; you'd better get him on the first shot.

Secondly, I think that the prosecutors will indict one of the kids first, hoping to get them to turn on dad.

John Thomas8 · #21

Nobody is getting indicted, they can't even keep prosecutors in place to make cases.

There is no justice.

Chilidog · #22

What yhe fuck is up with that?

#23

Democrats can't risk doing something that can be interpreted as political.

Off Topic

And we wonder why we can't successfully gain the upper hand in politics long enough to take a half step forward before the next election takes us two steps back. Even though we outnumber the right and most people actually prefer Democratic policies.

And here's the thing: when the party that has the most actual policy support can't stay in power for more than 2 short years at a time, followed by 6 or more years of obstruction or even complete shut-out, doesn't that suggest that depending on people to "notice policy and vote policy" isn't realistic?

Fogbow