TX Anti-Abortion Law

Uninformed
Posts: 2278
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:13 pm
Location: England

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#251

Post by Uninformed »

“‘Anonymous’ hackers have a message for Texas abortion ‘snitch’ sites: We’re coming for you“:
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/anonymou ... tion-jane/
If you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?
User avatar
Dr. Ken
Posts: 3890
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:12 pm
Contact:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#252

Post by Dr. Ken »

Here's the way back machine link it was glorious
https://web.archive.org/web/20210911101 ... asgop.org/
ImageImagePhilly Boondoggle
User avatar
MN-Skeptic
Posts: 3957
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
Location: Twin Cities

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#253

Post by MN-Skeptic »

Akiva Cohen - one of the good lawyers that I follow on twitter - tweeted the following:



Enlightenment of what he's doing was provided in reply tweets -



And a reference to Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt
Tim Walz’ Golden Rule: Mind your own damn business!
User avatar
Lani
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:42 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#254

Post by Lani »

Texas.png
Texas.png (258.84 KiB) Viewed 2569 times
Image You can't wait until life isn't hard anymore before you decide to be happy.
User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 12484
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#255

Post by Volkonski »

“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 12484
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#256

Post by Volkonski »



“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 12484
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#257

Post by Volkonski »

“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6489
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#258

Post by bob »


The complaint is ... uhhh ... "interesting": The plaintiff, Oscar Stilley, is from Arkansas and a federal felon "tax protester."

To state the obvious: the doctor wrote about violating the Texas law to attract this kind of lawsuit.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
neeneko
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:32 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#259

Post by neeneko »

bob wrote: Mon Sep 20, 2021 6:16 pm The complaint is ... uhhh ... "interesting."

The plaintiff, Oscar Stilley, is from Arkansas and a federal felon "tax protester."

To state the obvious: the doctor wrote about violating the Texas law to attract this kind of lawsuit.
I am guessing someone hoping to become famous by filing the lawsuit and using that to bring attention to their grievance.
jcolvin2
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:56 am
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#260

Post by jcolvin2 »

Oscar Stilley has a page on Quatloos!
Link to Quatloos
User avatar
Phoenix520
Posts: 4151
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:20 pm
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#261

Post by Phoenix520 »

Thus, I assume, is about the quality expected from all future suits, yes? A chance to wax eloquent on the perfidies of wayward women and surgeons while at the same time picking up a quick 10K? Or 100K, if you’re lucky/ask nicely. This is a most unChristian thing, all of it.

These hateful people can take their hats and their cattle and skedaddle, for all I care. Wtf do Texans think is going to happen if their secession succeeds? Can’t hardly pick Texas up by her corners and carry her off. Do they think they’ll just lurk there in the corner of the country, no allegiance any longer to the United States, the perfect training ground for terrorists? :bag:
User avatar
Frater I*I
Posts: 3637
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:52 am
Location: City of Dis, Seventh Circle of Hell
Occupation: Certificated A&P Mechanic
Verified: ✅Verified Devilish Hyena
Contact:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#262

Post by Frater I*I »

Phoenix520 wrote: Mon Sep 20, 2021 9:54 pm Thus, I assume, is about the quality expected from all future suits, yes? A chance to wax eloquent on the perfidies of wayward women and surgeons while at the same time picking up a quick 10K? Or 100K, if you’re lucky/ask nicely. This is a most unChristian thing, all of it.

These hateful people can take their hats and their cattle and skedaddle, for all I care. Wtf do Texans think is going to happen if their secession succeeds? Can’t hardly pick Texas up by her corners and carry her off. Do they think they’ll just lurk there in the corner of the country, no allegiance any longer to the United States, the perfect training ground for terrorists? :bag:
It already is....
"He sewed his eyes shut because he is afraid to see, He tries to tell me what I put inside of me
He's got the answers to ease my curiosity, He dreamed a god up and called it Christianity"

Trent Reznor
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6672
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#263

Post by northland10 »

jcolvin2 wrote: Mon Sep 20, 2021 8:47 pm Oscar Stilley has a page on Quatloos!
Link to Quatloos
This was a fun little bit there from wserra:
Post by wserra » Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:57 pm

And Stilley opens his defense of his law license by taking the Fifth.

Most people would not see this as a promising development for his prospects of remaining in the profession.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6672
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#264

Post by northland10 »

neeneko wrote: Mon Sep 20, 2021 6:30 pm
bob wrote: Mon Sep 20, 2021 6:16 pm The complaint is ... uhhh ... "interesting."

The plaintiff, Oscar Stilley, is from Arkansas and a federal felon "tax protester."

To state the obvious: the doctor wrote about violating the Texas law to attract this kind of lawsuit.
I am guessing someone hoping to become famous by filing the lawsuit and using that to bring attention to their grievance.
He is under supervision by the Bureau of Prison's Residential Reentry Management office in Dallas, so that is probably how he is deciding he can be in Texas. I am not sure if he is in some facility there or in-home confinement somewhere. His full release date is not till August 2023. It may make it tough to attend hearings.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 20219
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#265

Post by raison de arizona »

The lawsuit states that he is on home confinement in Cedarville, AR.
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6489
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#266

Post by bob »

And the Texas law doesn't say you have to be a citizen of Texas, or even be in Texas, to sue.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 11421
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: grumpy ol' geezer

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#267

Post by Foggy »

They'd like having a longer border. :roll:
User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 12484
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#268

Post by Volkonski »

“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
User avatar
slq
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:18 am

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#269

Post by slq »

Stephen Miller. :vomit: :vomit: :vomit:
"Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try."
--Yoda
User avatar
Volkonski
Posts: 12484
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:06 am
Location: Texoma and North Fork of Long Island
Occupation: Retired mechanical engineer
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#270

Post by Volkonski »

“If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war.” ― Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace
User avatar
neonzx
Posts: 7548
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:01 am
Location: FloriDUH Hell
Verified: 🤩✅✅✅✅✅🤩

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#271

Post by neonzx »

:shrug: sucks to be them.
User avatar
AndyinPA
Posts: 10872
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:42 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#272

Post by AndyinPA »

https://apnews.com/article/abortion-hea ... 218b268bbe
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — An abortion bill similar to one signed into law in Texas was filed in Florida on Wednesday that would ban most abortions in the state and would allow lawsuits against doctors who violate it.

The legislation filed by Republican Rep. Webster Barnaby immediately met with opposition from Democrats who want to preserve the right to legal abortions. Barnaby’s office said he wasn’t ready to comment on it.

“This bill is dangerous, radical, and unconstitutional. The hypocrisy of this attempt by Governor (Ron) DeSantis and Republicans in the state legislature to take away our rights while at the same time preaching ’my body, my choice’ when it comes to wearing masks is absolutely disgusting,” Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried said in a statement. Fried is a Democratic candidate to challenge DeSantis next year.

While similar bills have died in the Florida Legislature in past sessions, the debate has heated up since the U.S. Supreme Court chose not to block the Texas law that bans abortion when a so-called “fetal heartbeat” is detected, or about six weeks into pregnancy, before many women realize they are expecting.
I'll cross post this if I can find a better spot for Florida.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
User avatar
RTH10260
Posts: 17323
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
Verified: ✔️ Eurobot

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#273

Post by RTH10260 »

Two disbarred lawyers sued a Texas doctor who performed an abortion. Flustered ‘pro-lifers’ are backpedaling
Anti-choice groups are embarrassed that their draconian law is being enforced the way it was designed

Moira Donegan
Sun 26 Sep 2021 11.27 BST

Dr Alan Braid, an OBGYN based in San Antonio, broke the law on purpose. In an essay published in the Washington Post last Saturday, the doctor announced that he performed an abortion on a woman who was past six weeks of gestation, the limit imposed by Texas’s new abortion ban, SB8. The doctor wrote that he felt morally obliged to perform the procedure, his worldview shaped by his years in obstetric practice having conversations with patients who revealed that they were terminating their pregnancies because they couldn’t afford more kids, because they had been raped, because they were with abusive partners, or because they wanted to pursue other dreams.

He wrote, too, of beginning his practice in 1972, the year before Roe v Wade, the last time an outright ban on abortion was in effect in his state. “At the hospital that year, I saw three teenagers die from illegal abortions,” Dr Braid wrote. “One I will never forget. When she came into the ER, her vaginal cavity was packed with rags. She died a few days later from massive organ failure, caused by a septic infection.” Dr Braid reasoned that to avoid such needless deaths, he had a “duty of care” to the woman whose newly illegal abortion he performed.

He was promptly sued. Two complaints – both from men living out of state – were filed against Dr Braid on Monday morning. One, a rambling, weird document, comes from a convicted felon and disbarred former attorney named Oscar Stilley, who is serving a prison term on house arrest in Arkansas. That complaint, which Stilley seems to have written himself, makes multiple references to Dr Braid’s conduct regarding “bastards” and his supposed belief in a god referred to by the Hebrew name “Elohim.” Stilley, who has said he does not personally oppose abortion, feels strongly that “if there’s money to be had, it’s going to go in Oscar’s pocket.”

The second lawsuit is from a man named Felipe Gomez of Illinois, another disbarred lawyer, who labels himself “pro-choice plaintiff”, and whose complaint asks only that SB8 be overturned. These test cases, strange and off-putting as they are, now represent the best chance for SB8 to be vacated, and for abortion rights to be returned to Texans – at least for now.

It didn’t have to be this way. When a conservative state passes an abortion ban – as they do with some regularity – state employees are usually tasked with enforcing the law, those employees are named as defendants in lawsuits brought by pro-choice groups, and the law is blocked from going into effect by courts that declare it unconstitutional before any real patients are denied abortion care. But Texas’s SB8 was designed to elide this normal process of judicial review, with a novel enforcement mechanism that bars state agents from acting to enforce the law. Instead, the law can only be enforced by private civil suits against people suspected of facilitating abortions – lawsuits, that is, like the ones filed by Stilley and Gomez.

This private enforcement mechanism is like a legal Rube Goldberg machine built into SB8, creating a clever way to evade courts recognizing the bill’s abortion ban as unconstitutional. Created by an insidious conservative lawyer named Jonathan Mitchell, the loophole was designed to confound lawsuits against the law’s constitutionality with procedural, rather than substantive, questions, and to guarantee that SB8 would go into effect. The device is transparent bid to circumvent the authority of the federal courts. But those same federal courts, by now warped by decades of anti-choice influence on the judicial nominations process, let it slide anyway. Judges on the fifth circuit court of appeals, and later on the supreme court, found that the procedural questions that were engineered by SB8 provided them a sufficient pretext to do what they wanted to do anyway: allow a state to outlaw abortion within its borders, and effectively end Roe.

And so, when the supreme court allowed SB8 to go into effect, it left the pro-choice movement with no choice. Pre-enforcement litigation failed on flimsy and artificial procedural grounds; what was needed was an illegal abortion, performed by someone willing to take on enormous personal risk, to create a test case. Only a deliberate legal violation would allow SB8 could be reviewed on the merits. This is where Dr Braid comes in. In addition to the enormous service he gave to the patient whose abortion he performed, he also did a service to the pro-choice movement, and to women statewide. He took on enormous personal liability so that the question of their right to an abortion could get a fair hearing.


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ckpedaling
User avatar
Tiredretiredlawyer
Posts: 8176
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:07 pm
Location: Rescue Pets Land
Occupation: 21st Century Suffragist
Verified: ✅🐴🐎🦄🌻5000 posts and counting

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#274

Post by Tiredretiredlawyer »

Good for Dr. Braid!!!!!!!!
"Mickey Mouse and I grew up together." - Ruthie Tompson, Disney animation checker and scene planner and one of the first women to become a member of the International Photographers Union in 1952.
User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 7531
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
Location: The eff away from trump.
Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
Verified:

Re: TX Anti-Abortion Law

#275

Post by Slim Cognito »

Indeed. I wonder if he'd made prior arrangements with the ACLU or another civil liberties legal org.
May the bridges I burn light my way.

ImageImageImage x5
Post Reply

Return to “Law and Lawsuits”