CNN)Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Monday claimed election fraud is a threat to America, revealing in a forceful dissent some support for former President Donald Trump and Republicans who have refused to accept the result of the 2020 election.
A longtime conservative, Thomas' legal views naturally aligned with the Trump administration. But his dissent stands out for how much it subscribed to the Trump worldview of fraud, a notion debunked by election law experts and that has failed overwhelmingly in dozens of state and federal court challenges.
"We are fortunate that many of the cases we have seen alleged only improper rule changes, not fraud. But that observation provides only small comfort," Thomas said, dissenting as the court rejected a long-pending challenge to Pennsylvania mail-in voting procedures.
"An election free from strong evidence of systemic fraud is not alone sufficient for election confidence," Thomas wrote.
The Big Lie
The Big Lie
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/22/politics ... index.html
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
Re: The Big Lie, Voter Fraud
AndyinPA wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:12 pm https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/22/politics ... index.html
Thanks for the thread, Andy! But I'm wondering about the title? The issue of voter fraud is not really The Big Lie, which is the former guy & cos attempt to steal the 2020 election and stage a coup. Sort of quite specific! I'm thinking It's more a claim of election fraud -- rather than actual election fraud. So I think Voter Fraud should go. I'm actually thinking The Big LIe is a topic unto itself, and doesn't need anything more.CNN)Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Monday claimed election fraud is a threat to America, revealing in a forceful dissent some support for former President Donald Trump and Republicans who have refused to accept the result of the 2020 election.
Re: The Big Lie, Voter Fraud
He also spouted this nonsense in his dissents...
And he's a Supreme Court justice.
https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/l ... f-absence/
Lawyers Compare Justice Thomas’ Dissent on Pa. Election Cases to Rumsfeld’s ‘The Absence of Evidence Is Not the Evidence of Absence’
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was not happy that his colleagues on the high court chose to pass up the opportunity to weigh in on a slew of cases stemming from last year’s presidential elections, penning a highly critical dissent. Attorneys, on the other hand, pointed out that the stalwart conservative appeared to adopt the “argument from ignorance” fallacy with regards to voter irregularities, suggesting that a lack of proof is not enough to show fraud did not occur.
And he's a Supreme Court justice.
https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/l ... f-absence/
X 4
X 33
Re: The Big Lie, Voter Fraud
Yep, when John Danforth was on his "Josh Hawley was the Worst Mistake of My Life" media tour, I think he should've apologized for inflicting Clarence Thomas (and his evil wife) on the body politic.realist wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:03 am He also spouted this nonsense in his dissents...
Lawyers Compare Justice Thomas’ Dissent on Pa. Election Cases to Rumsfeld’s ‘The Absence of Evidence Is Not the Evidence of Absence’
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was not happy that his colleagues on the high court chose to pass up the opportunity to weigh in on a slew of cases stemming from last year’s presidential elections, penning a highly critical dissent. Attorneys, on the other hand, pointed out that the stalwart conservative appeared to adopt the “argument from ignorance” fallacy with regards to voter irregularities, suggesting that a lack of proof is not enough to show fraud did not occur.
And he's a Supreme Court justice.
https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/l ... f-absence/
Re: The Big Lie, Voter Fraud
p0rtia wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:00 amThat's true. I'll make the change.AndyinPA wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:12 pm https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/22/politics ... index.html
Thanks for the thread, Andy! But I'm wondering about the title? The issue of voter fraud is not really The Big Lie, which is the former guy & cos attempt to steal the 2020 election and stage a coup. Sort of quite specific! I'm thinking It's more a claim of election fraud -- rather than actual election fraud. So I think Voter Fraud should go. I'm actually thinking The Big LIe is a topic unto itself, and doesn't need anything more.CNN)Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Monday claimed election fraud is a threat to America, revealing in a forceful dissent some support for former President Donald Trump and Republicans who have refused to accept the result of the 2020 election.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
Re: The Big Lie, Voter Fraud
Thanks. I know how to do it and did it a couple of times. I don't know why it didn't stick.
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears… To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies." -Octavia E. Butler
- LM K
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:44 pm
- Location: Oregon
- Occupation: Professor Shrinky Lady, brainwashing young adults daily!
- Contact:
Re: The Big Lie
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/scot ... ion-gambit
SCOTUS refuses to hear Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission.
"The Supreme Court on Monday morning shot down ex-President Donald Trump’s legal team’s request to hear its lawsuit against the 2020 election results in Wisconsin, where Trump lost to now-President Joe Biden.
It was the final blow to Trump’s attempt to undo his defeat through flimsy lawsuits that consistently went down in flames."
SCOTUS refuses to hear Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission.
"The Supreme Court on Monday morning shot down ex-President Donald Trump’s legal team’s request to hear its lawsuit against the 2020 election results in Wisconsin, where Trump lost to now-President Joe Biden.
It was the final blow to Trump’s attempt to undo his defeat through flimsy lawsuits that consistently went down in flames."
"The jungle is no place for a cellist."
From "Take the Money and Run"
From "Take the Money and Run"
-
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:59 am
Re: The Big Lie, Voter Fraud
I always knew justice Thomas was an oxymoron.realist wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:03 am He also spouted this nonsense in his dissents...
Lawyers Compare Justice Thomas’ Dissent on Pa. Election Cases to Rumsfeld’s ‘The Absence of Evidence Is Not the Evidence of Absence’
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was not happy that his colleagues on the high court chose to pass up the opportunity to weigh in on a slew of cases stemming from last year’s presidential elections, penning a highly critical dissent. Attorneys, on the other hand, pointed out that the stalwart conservative appeared to adopt the “argument from ignorance” fallacy with regards to voter irregularities, suggesting that a lack of proof is not enough to show fraud did not occur.
And he's a Supreme Court justice.
https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/l ... f-absence/
You don't need religion to have morals. If you can't determine right from wrong then you lack empathy, not religion.
- noblepa
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
- Location: Bay Village, Ohio
- Occupation: Retired IT Nerd
Re: The Big Lie, Voter Fraud
Atticus Finch wrote: ↑Mon Mar 08, 2021 1:13 pmI always knew justice Thomas was an oxymoron.realist wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:03 am He also spouted this nonsense in his dissents...
Lawyers Compare Justice Thomas’ Dissent on Pa. Election Cases to Rumsfeld’s ‘The Absence of Evidence Is Not the Evidence of Absence’
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was not happy that his colleagues on the high court chose to pass up the opportunity to weigh in on a slew of cases stemming from last year’s presidential elections, penning a highly critical dissent. Attorneys, on the other hand, pointed out that the stalwart conservative appeared to adopt the “argument from ignorance” fallacy with regards to voter irregularities, suggesting that a lack of proof is not enough to show fraud did not occur.
And he's a Supreme Court justice.
https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/l ... f-absence/
The argument that "lack of proof is not enough to show fraud did not occur" is not wrong. But it is not a legal argument. Nor is it logical. The statement is inartfully worded. I would revise it to say "lack of proof of fraud is not proof that fraud did not occur". It is difficult to prove a negative.
In the law, the one making a claim about something, or making an accusation, has the burden of proving that the claim or accusation is true. We always (and IMHO, correctly) start from the premise that the accusation is false. It is then up to the accuser to provide evidence to prove their claim.
In the US legal system, judges and courts are not investigative bodies. Investigation and discovery of evidence is (and should be) done by the plaintiff and defendant, not the judge.
So, if a case somehow makes it to SCOTUS with no visible evidence, it is proper that the court decline to hear the case. If there is no evidence, there is nothing to hear. The only exception that this IANAL can think of is if one party or the other claims that there is, in fact, evidence, but a lower court erred in not allowing it to be introduced. However, in that case, the question becomes, not "is the claim true", but "did the lower court err". If SCOTUS found the latter, they would almost certainly do nothing more than remand the case back to the trial court for reconsideration.
For one thing, as I said, the court is not an investigator. This is especially true of the Supreme Court. While justices can and do ask questions during oral arguments, they are not asking witnesses. They are asking lawyers for the competing sides. SCOTUS does not usually address the merits of a case, only the relevant law and the procedures and decisions in the lower courts.
For another, were the court to agree to hear the case and hand down a ruling, only to have evidence actually turn up, the court is left with egg on its collective face. They are then faced with the difficult task of reversing their own decision.
- roadscholar
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:17 am
- Location: Baltimore
- Occupation: Renaissance Mechanic
- Contact:
Re: The Big Lie
Sure... and inductively, a lack of evidence of fraud when literally millions of people are intensely interested in finding said fraud, and after multiple professional, expert attempts to do so... that's an extremely reliable indication that it did not in fact occur.
The bitterest truth is more wholesome than the sweetest lie.
- LM K
- Posts: 3144
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:44 pm
- Location: Oregon
- Occupation: Professor Shrinky Lady, brainwashing young adults daily!
- Contact:
Re: The Big Lie
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/10/politics ... index.html
Wall Street Journal: Trump pressured Georgia investigator to find 'the right answer' in baseless fraud push
Wall Street Journal: Trump pressured Georgia investigator to find 'the right answer' in baseless fraud push
WSJ has the recording ... behind a paywall.In a phone call to the Georgia secretary of state's office in December, then-President Donald Trump urged a top investigator to find fraud in the 2020 presidential election, telling her that she would be "praised" for overturning results that were in favor of Joe Biden, according to newly reported audio of the call obtained by The Wall Street Journal.
The report is the latest example of Trump's extraordinary efforts to influence Georgia election officials as they certified the results, even though there is no evidence of widespread fraud in the election. Trump's actions have drawn the attention of Georgia's Republican secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, as well as a Fulton County prosecutor who has launched a criminal investigation.
"When the right answer comes out, you'll be praised," Trump tells Frances Watson, the chief investigator at the Georgia secretary of state's office, in a six-minute conversation on December 23, according to the Journal.
"The jungle is no place for a cellist."
From "Take the Money and Run"
From "Take the Money and Run"
- sugar magnolia
- Posts: 3898
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:54 pm
Re: The Big Lie
"Whatever you can do for us, Frances."
Re: The Big Lie
Not on the tape: "Bless your heart, Mr. President"
- Flatpoint High
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:58 am
- Location: Hotel California, PH523, Galaxy Central, M103
- Occupation: professional pain in the ass, voice actor & keeper of the straight face
- Verified: ✅
Re: The Big Lie
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/14/politics ... index.html
More at the linkCNN) — Officials in the Georgia Secretary of State's Office located a recently released recording of former President Donald Trump's call to a state investigator in a trash folder on her device, a state official familiar with the situation confirmed to CNN.
The discovery of the call comes after state officials originally told CNN that they did not think audio of the call existed. The call added to the examples of Trump's extraordinary efforts to push false claims of widespread voter fraud and influence Georgia election officials as they certified the state's election results.
The audio file of the December 23 call between the former President and investigator Frances Watson was discovered as the Georgia Secretary of State's Office responded to a public records request. The personal familiar spoke with CNN on the condition of anonymity to describe the internal process.
castigat ridendo mores.
VELOCIUS QUAM ASPARAGI COQUANTUR
VELOCIUS QUAM ASPARAGI COQUANTUR
- RTH10260
- Posts: 17166
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am
- Location: Switzerland, near the Alps
- Verified: ✔️ Eurobot
Re: The Big Lie
Texas AG Says Trump Would've 'Lost' State If It Hadn't Blocked Mail-in Ballots Applications Being Sent Out
BY JASON LEMON ON 6/5/21 AT 3:59 PM EDT
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, said former President Donald Trump would have lost in Texas in the 2020 election if his office had not successfully blocked counties from mailing out applications for mail-in ballots to all registered voters.
Harris County, home to the city of Houston, wanted to mail out applications for mail-in ballots to its approximately 2.4 million registered voters due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the conservative Texas Supreme Court blocked the county from doing so after it faced litigation from Paxton's office.
"If we'd lost Harris County—Trump won by 620,000 votes in Texas. Harris County mail-in ballots that they wanted to send out were 2.5 million, those were all illegal and we were able to stop every one of them," Paxton told former Trump adviser Steve Bannon during the latter's War Room podcast on Friday.
"Had we not done that, we would have been in the very same situation—we would've been on Election Day, I was watching on election night and I knew, when I saw what was happening in these other states, that that would've been Texas. We would've been in the same boat. We would've been one of those battleground states that they were counting votes in Harris County for three days and Donald Trump would've lost the election," the Republican official said.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, said Friday that former President Donald Trump would have lost in the southwestern state if his office hadn't blocked counties from sending mail-in ballot applications to registered voters. In this photo, Paxton speaks during a panel discussion during the Conservative Political Action Conference held in the Hyatt Regency on February 27 in Orlando, Florida.
Notably, the Texas attorney general conflated mail-in ballots with applications for mail-in ballots in his remarks to Bannon. Harris County did not attempt to mail actual ballots to registered voters—just applications to request them if the individual voter wanted one.
https://www.newsweek.com/texas-ag-says- ... ng-1597909
Re: The Big Lie
So, it's illegal in Texas for registered voters to...vote?
"It actually doesn't take much to be considered a difficult woman. That's why there are so many of us."
--Jane Goodall
--Jane Goodall
- Estiveo
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:50 am
- Location: Inland valley, Central Coast, CA
- Verified: ✅
Re: The Big Lie
Well, only if they're Democrats. Or Black. Or anyone else not loyal to the Great Orange Gasbag & His Elk.
Seriously, RV, what are ya, new?
- Frater I*I
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:52 am
- Location: City of Dis, Seventh Circle of Hell
- Occupation: Certificated A&P Mechanic
- Verified: ✅Verified Devilish Hyena
- Contact:
Re: The Big Lie
When your strategy to stay in power is to keep people from voting because they disagree with your platform....
You're not a Republican anymore....you're a Fascist.
You're not a Republican anymore....you're a Fascist.
"He sewed his eyes shut because he is afraid to see, He tries to tell me what I put inside of me
He's got the answers to ease my curiosity, He dreamed a god up and called it Christianity"
Trent Reznor
He's got the answers to ease my curiosity, He dreamed a god up and called it Christianity"
Trent Reznor
Re: The Big Lie
Trump has an elk?
Where's my elk?
Why can't I have an elk?
Re: The Big Lie
I always liked Moose better, especially Chocolate Moose.
- noblepa
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
- Location: Bay Village, Ohio
- Occupation: Retired IT Nerd
Re: The Big Lie
Well, he probably does use mousse on his hair.