2020 Election Lawsuits

[Luke]

Back in May, tweeted about Fielder's failure. Shameless they raised $95K from 2100 people on that stupid https://www.dominionclassaction.com/ site.





Here's Mike's full thread, a great read.






They are STILL begging for "contributions", pop up on their site:

Grifting Fielder.JPG (104.56 KiB) Viewed 3395 times

[Uninformed]

[Dave from down under]

Any chance of costs being awarded?

Can there be sanctions?

[humblescribe]

So, besides offering up the voluntary dismissal, the lawyer throws in some op-ed paragraphs as a bonus?

What does the author's opinion have to do with the motion to dismiss?

[northland10]

Any chance of costs being awarded?

Can there be sanctions?

It is hard to tell who is left and was served as he dismissed a boatload of defendants earlier. It looks like the likely remaining parties who were served, made an appearance, and filed stuff are the various Democratic Committees and the GA gov and SOS.

[p0rtia]

So, besides offering up the voluntary dismissal, the lawyer throws in some op-ed paragraphs as a bonus?

What does the author's opinion have to do with the motion to dismiss?

That got me too. Taking two bites at that apple there. They didn't have the funds to go on (they give as their reason for withdrawal); but if they'd had the funds, their case would have been a valid and important one, like so many other (which they could have won, they imply).

In the fantasy world where I am Judge p0rtia, I wouldn't let that pass.

*edited three times, because travel fog. No doubt I missed a few other booboos.

[chancery]

City of Detroit's Supplemental Brief in support of sanctions. David Fink has brought some receipts.

detroit supplemental brief re sanctions, king v whiitmer.pdf

(238.47 KiB) Downloaded 212 times

[raison de arizona]

Holy crap! The intro is blistering!

[much ado]

Holy crap! The intro is blistering!

A joy to read.

[Lani]

[fierceredpanda]

Unlike the plaintiffs' attorneys' filings, Fink's brief actually addresses the issue the judge seemed most interested in; namely, the apparent lack of due diligence on the part of the lawyers in filing affidavits making outlandish claims about the election.

It's a good idea when the judge clearly wants to focus on one particular aspect of a case to at least try to be responsive in any subsequent filings. Not doing so is an...interesting choice?

[chancery]

Yes.

Although interestingly, Fink did not focus on the pre-filing investigation that should have been performed by plaintiffs’ counsel (perhaps he'll address that on reply, in light of the plaintiffs' lawyers failure to defend their efforts in this round of briefing), but instead on their Rule 11 violation at the July 12 hearing.

Yet, on July 12, 2021, all nine of these attorneys and the attorneys representing them were prepared to foist yet another misrepresentation on this Court without the slightest bit of objective inquiry. This false representation to this Court is particularly troubling when it comes fully six months after the issue of the factual basis for Ramsland’s affidavit was highlighted in the City’s Motion for Sanctions and more than seven months after Ramsland’s significant factual error was raised in the City’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion.

[Tiredretiredlawyer]

Fink puts "blister" in the word "blistering".

Agree with FRP that the judge told the Krakenites what would be on the final exam and they ignored it.

ETA: Krakenites or Krakenoids?

[Slim Cognito]

krakenoid means looks like a kraken so I'd go with krakenite (associated with)

[p0rtia]

Krackenistas

[p0rtia]

Krackistani

Krackpots

[Estiveo]

Duh, Krakheads.

[Dr. Ken]

Nutty Krakers

[SuzieC]

Wow, David Fink brings the hammer down on Powell and Wood. A joy to read.

[raison de arizona]

If you haven’t read this, go read it. Here are a couple words on one of my favorite people, Lin Wood.

Lin2liner

58301424-ACB5-4CB6-993D-A6311C564525.jpeg (183.17 KiB) Viewed 2886 times

And they were all up in his shit:

Cmon Lin, really?

0D9C13FB-9413-444A-82F3-61154A0CF211.png (443.28 KiB) Viewed 2886 times

And finally, for everyone involved:

You all suck and I award you no points

766E97F0-B0AE-49B9-B354-C8F502492E7C.jpeg (202.03 KiB) Viewed 2886 times

[Tiredretiredlawyer]

What great suggestions for what to call the Plaintiffs' lawyers!

p0rtia and estiveo win the interwebs for Krackpots and krakheads.

[Reality Check]

Krakpoots?

Great response by Mr. Fink.

[Jim]

The choice of the Kracken was probably more accurate than they thought and for all the the wrong reasons...the Kracken loses at the end. Like they are.

[Slim Cognito]

Krakpoots?

change approved.png (39.68 KiB) Viewed 2823 times

[Tiredretiredlawyer]