GIL: Klayman

[bob]

He'd prosecute you if he knew who you were, bob.

BUT I ACCEPTED HIS BUSINESS CARD!

[johnpcapitalist]

It appears that Klayman is a legal juggernaut, where the mere threat of legal proceedings might unleash his vast armies of followers to pressure those he intends to target. Larry's post has attracted around 120 views in more than a day since he posted it. Could it be that Larry's irrelevant, a fate worse than death for someone like him? That was the fate of Capt Karl on Twitter -- thousands of posts which netted him only a few dozen likes.

[bob]

Larry's post has attracted around 120 views in more than a day since he posted it. Could it be that Larry's irrelevant, a fate worse than death for someone like him? That was the fate of Capt Karl on Twitter -- thousands of posts which netted him only a few dozen likes.

Yes.

IIRC, Santilli said Klayman was functionally computer illiterate. (I would believe that.)

Computer literacy aside, Klayman is just bad at social media generally (and too also life).

[Ben-Prime]

He'd prosecute you if he knew who you were, bob.

BUT I ACCEPTED HIS BUSINESS CARD!

To GIL, that practically makes you a client. On the other hand, to GIL, that's no protection from being sued and/or defamed by him.

[sad-cafe]

Not the flex Klayman believes it to be.

Where the f did anyone think this was a tampon

[noblepa]

"For completeness," in the past four years, Klayman has announced or initiated "proceedings" against Bidens (Joe [multiple times], Jill, Hunter, and James); Judges Howell, Marchan, and Metha; Bragg; Garland; Wray; Gerstein (Politico reporter); Fauci; Obama; Clinton; Brennan; Soros; "all J6 committee members"; Omar; Tlaib; Baldwin; Harris; Swalwell; Kerry; McConnell; Burr; and Rosenstein.

As if we needed it, this is simply more proof of his grifting.

As one who graduated law school and passed the bar exam, he HAS to know that Grand Juries do not try or convict ANYONE. A GJ only determines whether or not there is sufficient evidence to hold a trial before a Petite jury, which CAN convict someone.

Furthermore, as a law-school graduate, he also must know that Citizen's Grand Juries are nothing more than live-action role playing by crazy people who think that they can make their own laws.

[bob]

As one who graduated law school and passed the bar exam, he HAS to know that Grand Juries do not try or convict ANYONE. A GJ only determines whether or not there is sufficient evidence to hold a trial before a Petite jury, which CAN convict someone.

Klayman often is sloppy in his writing. But the few times that he's gone beyond his inditements, there were fake judges and a fake trials. No jury because the defendants were deemed to have waived the right to a jury.

Furthermore, as a law-school graduate, he also must know that Citizen's Grand Juries are nothing more than live-action role playing by crazy people who think that they can make their own laws.

Klayman plays along, and cites the usual textproofing that SovCits use to justify their fake proceedings. But Klayman's tell that he actually knows the law is that the fake verdicts and fake sentences just sit in a drawer, accumulating dust. Klayman is smarter than those who present their fake documents to real courts.

Because, ultimately, there is a First Amendment right to cosplay.

[northland10]

p.s. send money