Missouri v. New York

Trying to make sense of a crazy world, with limited success mostly
Post Reply
User avatar
raison de arizona
Posts: 20219
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Nothing, Arizona
Occupation: bit twiddler
Verified: ✔️ he/him/his

Missouri v. New York

#1

Post by raison de arizona »

Filed. Haven't read yet, but have at it.
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT: https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/M ... -v.-NY.pdf
Press release: https://ago.mo.gov/missouri-attorney-ge ... erference/
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” —John Adams
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6441
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Missouri v. New York

#2

Post by bob »

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT: https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/M ... -v.-NY.pdf
The only issues are:
(1) Whether SCOTUS will deny this over the summer or wait until the long conference in the fall; and
(2) Whether the denial will be 9-0 or 7-2.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
noblepa
Posts: 2609
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:55 pm
Location: Bay Village, Ohio
Occupation: Retired IT Nerd

Missouri v. New York

#3

Post by noblepa »

bob wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:06 pm
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT: https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/M ... -v.-NY.pdf
The only issues are:
(1) Whether SCOTUS will deny this over the summer or wait until the long conference in the fall; and
(2) Whether the denial will be 9-0 or 7-2.
I realize that SCOTUS has original jurisdiction in lawsuits involving one state suing another, but I fail to see how the state of Missouri has standing to sue New York over a New York court case.

The complaint states that they are asking SCOTUS for " a stay of New York’s gag order and impending sentence against Donald J. Trump during the 2024 Presidential election season so Missourians can participate in the selection free from New York’s exercise of coercive power limiting the ability of Trump to campaign."

That seems to me to be a stretch. I assume that, even when one state sues another, there must be some actual damage, not just a potential, in order to confer standing on the plaintiff.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6441
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Missouri v. New York

#4

Post by bob »

noblepa wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 2:05 pmI realize that SCOTUS has original jurisdiction in lawsuits involving one state suing another, but I fail to see how the state of Missouri has standing to sue New York over a New York court case.
Exactly; it is 2020's Texas v. Pennsylvania redux.

It is just lawfare to prop up a political campaign.

And a waste of judicial resources that likely will draw a bar complaint. Counsel of record is Missouri's Solicitor General, Joshua Devine. (YLS '16 and a Thomas SCOTUS clerk, natch.)
I assume that, even when one state sues another, there must be some actual damage, not just a potential, in order to confer standing on the plaintiff.
Not in the Calvinball 5th Circuit. :towel:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Ben-Prime
Posts: 3101
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:29 pm
Location: Worldwide Availability
Occupation: Managing People Who Manage Machines
Verified: ✅MamaSaysI'mBonaFide

Missouri v. New York

#5

Post by Ben-Prime »

bob wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:34 pm Not in the Calvinball 5th Circuit. :towel:
Now I want to distract myself from the horrors of the daily news by coming up with cartoon counterparts for each of the 'Big Name' courts and circuits (*). Just another accidental service provided by the great minds here at The 'bow.

(*) - this may also be because I have just woken up and rolled out of bed and am still hazy. But Imma credit Bob for the idea anyway.
But the sunshine aye shall light the sky,
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.

- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6441
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Missouri v. New York

#6

Post by bob »

"For completeness," New York filed its opposition, and Missouri filed its reply.

Because there's a motion for a preliminary injunction, SCOTUS could issue a ruling at any time (and not wait until October).
Image ImageImage
User avatar
John Thomas8
Posts: 6124
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:42 pm
Location: Central NC
Occupation: Tech Support

Missouri v. New York

#7

Post by John Thomas8 »

What's wrong with Missouri's AG? From filing stupid cases like this to actively trying to get innocent people executed, there doesn't seem to be many redeeming qualities he possesses.
User avatar
Rolodex
Posts: 1715
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2023 12:06 pm

Missouri v. New York

#8

Post by Rolodex »

John Thomas8 wrote: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:57 pm What's wrong with Missouri's AG? From filing stupid cases like this to actively trying to get innocent people executed, there doesn't seem to be many redeeming qualities he possesses.
He must be good buddies with our AG here in Alabama. He's a real piece of shit.
Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6531
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

Missouri v. New York

#9

Post by northland10 »

John Thomas8 wrote: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:57 pm What's wrong with Missouri's AG? From filing stupid cases like this to actively trying to get innocent people executed, there doesn't seem to be many redeeming qualities he possesses.
What's wrong with him? He's up for election and the primary is next week.

Looking at the endorsements, it is a race to the bottom for thr GOP nomination.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
John Thomas8
Posts: 6124
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:42 pm
Location: Central NC
Occupation: Tech Support

Missouri v. New York

#10

Post by John Thomas8 »

northland10 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 7:36 pm
John Thomas8 wrote: Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:57 pm What's wrong with Missouri's AG? From filing stupid cases like this to actively trying to get innocent people executed, there doesn't seem to be many redeeming qualities he possesses.
What's wrong with him? He's up for election and the primary is next week.

Looking at the endorsements, it is a race to the bottom for thr GOP nomination.
His opponent appears to be only millimeters better.
User avatar
Slim Cognito
Posts: 7356
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:15 am
Location: The eff away from trump.
Occupation: Hats. I do hats.
Verified:

Missouri v. New York

#11

Post by Slim Cognito »

I ran screaming from Missouri in 2012. Then I ran screaming from Florida in 2024. Hopefully, I will die here in New Mexico, just not too soon.
May the bridges I burn light my way.

ImageImageImage x5
User avatar
Foggy
Dick Tater
Posts: 11193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:45 am
Location: Fogbow HQ
Occupation: Dick Tater/Space Cadet
Verified: grumpy ol' geezer

Missouri v. New York

#12

Post by Foggy »

Off Topic
Slim, I'm so glad you're doing well in NM. ❤️
I'm Foggy and I forget if I approved this message.
chancery
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:24 pm
Verified:

Missouri v. New York

#13

Post by chancery »

Off Topic
:yeahthat:
User avatar
MN-Skeptic
Posts: 3891
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:03 pm
Location: Twin Cities

Missouri v. New York

#14

Post by MN-Skeptic »


Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney

JUST IN: The Supreme Court has denied Missouri's lawsuit against NY seeking to block DA Alvin Bragg's prosecution of Donald Trump
Tim Walz’ Golden Rule: Mind your own damn business!
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6441
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

Missouri v. New York

#15

Post by bob »

bob wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2024 3:06 pm The only issues are:
(1) Whether SCOTUS will deny this over the summer or wait until the long conference in the fall; and
(2) Whether the denial will be 9-0 or 7-2.
:towel:

I appreciate the two dissenters made an effort to (somewhat) explain that they believe that SCOTUS has jurisdiction but the claim is unmeritorious.

And now we wait to see if a bar complaint surfaces. :popcorn:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Rolodex
Posts: 1715
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2023 12:06 pm

Missouri v. New York

#16

Post by Rolodex »

LOL AL AG had joined or written an amicus in this. Just Alabama being loserville again.
Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain
User avatar
neeneko
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:32 am

Missouri v. New York

#17

Post by neeneko »

So... Missouri really feels it is critical to the election that their voters know who to harass in another state?
Reddog
Posts: 409
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:29 pm

Missouri v. New York

#18

Post by Reddog »

:bag:
Post Reply

Return to “Current Politics”