#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

Abandon reality, all ye who enter here. *Democracy*Under*Threat*
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#576

Post by realist »

Estiveo wrote: Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:35 pm
bob wrote: Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:08 pm Facebook comments:
Rob Morton wrote:Funny, I saw you were under a NDA.
:roll: :callonme: :yankyank:
Left my comment there, awaiting a response.
Estiveo_20240711_123349.jpg
Saw that one. I left a few there as well. All factual. Today I clicked on notifications that people had responded to some of my responses. I went ther and made an additional response to a nutjob. Shortly after that I received another notification of a response to one of my comments and discovered when I clicked on the link I've been blocked. On any and all Brunson Facebook pages. :lol:

Like birthers, they can't handle the truth. Gotta keep the grift going.
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
Estiveo
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:50 am
Location: Inland valley, Central Coast, CA
Verified:

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#577

Post by Estiveo »

They didn't block me, but my comment has mysteriously disappeared.
Image Image Image Image
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#578

Post by realist »

Estiveo wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 2:42 pm They didn't block me, but my comment has mysteriously disappeared.
I'm SHOCKED!!
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#579

Post by bob »

Bleacher Report: Jalen Brunson, Knicks Reach $157M Contract Extension; Was Eligible for $269M in 2025.

Brunson news that I can actually use! :towel:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#580

Post by realist »

bob wrote: Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:28 pm Bleacher Report: Jalen Brunson, Knicks Reach $157M Contract Extension; Was Eligible for $269M in 2025.

Brunson news that I can actually use! :towel:
:lol:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#581

Post by bob »

Christmas The December holidays came a little earlier than expected:

Brunson rehearing DENNIED.

There are (finally!) officially no more Brunson cases pending.

2020 is SAFE. :smoking:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Ben-Prime
Posts: 3030
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:29 pm
Location: Worldwide Availability
Occupation: Managing People Who Manage Machines
Verified: ✅MamaSaysI'mBonaFide

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#582

Post by Ben-Prime »

bob wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 4:27 pm Christmas The December holidays came a little earlier than expected:

Brunson rehearing DENNIED.

There are (finally!) officially no more Brunson cases pending.

2020 is SAFE. :smoking:
But what if they appeal to the Intergalactic Space Court?
But the sunshine aye shall light the sky,
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.

- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#583

Post by bob »

Ben-Prime wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 5:36 pm But what if they appeal to the Intergalactic Space Court?
:fingerwag: :
Raland wrote:2nd Petition for a Hearing DENIED.

I'm only allowed two petitions, so my case against the 3 Justices is now in the hands of their possible future considerations (all cases in the U.S. Supreme Court that have been denied can be recalled by the Justices at any time).

It's been a four and a half year battle and we want to thank all of you for your amazing and diligent support during that time.

God bless all of you.
:brickwallsmall:
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Ben-Prime
Posts: 3030
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:29 pm
Location: Worldwide Availability
Occupation: Managing People Who Manage Machines
Verified: ✅MamaSaysI'mBonaFide

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#584

Post by Ben-Prime »

Are we sure he even wrote that? I don't see a plea for money at the end.
But the sunshine aye shall light the sky,
As round and round we run;
And the truth shall ever come uppermost,
And justice shall be done.

- Charles Mackay, "Eternal Justice"
User avatar
Frater I*I
Posts: 3454
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:52 am
Location: City of Dis, Seventh Circle of Hell
Occupation: Certificated A&P Mechanic
Verified: ✅Verified Devilish Hyena
Contact:

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#585

Post by Frater I*I »

bob wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 4:27 pm Christmas The December holidays came a little earlier than expected:

Brunson rehearing DENNIED.

There are (finally!) officially no more Brunson cases pending.

2020 is SAFE. :smoking:
Finally a stake hammered through the heart of the horse [expletive deleted].....
"He sewed his eyes shut because he is afraid to see, He tries to tell me what I put inside of me
He's got the answers to ease my curiosity, He dreamed a god up and called it Christianity"

Trent Reznor
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6310
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#586

Post by northland10 »

bob wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 5:46 pm
Ben-Prime wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 5:36 pm But what if they appeal to the Intergalactic Space Court?
:fingerwag: :
Raland wrote:2nd Petition for a Hearing DENIED.

I'm only allowed two petitions, so my case against the 3 Justices is now in the hands of their possible future considerations (all cases in the U.S. Supreme Court that have been denied can be recalled by the Justices at any time).

It's been a four and a half year battle and we want to thank all of you for your amazing and diligent support during that time.

God bless all of you.
:brickwallsmall:
Maybe Brunson read the first and maybe paragraph or so of this article.
https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/view ... ular_media
It ain’t over till it’s over.

Truer words were never spoken, and yet the question remains: When, exactly, is it over? Perhaps the safest answer, when it comes to
litigation, is “never.” Even a years-old judgment could, in unusual circumstances, be reopened.1 Nonetheless, it is usually safe to say that a case
has run its course – that the advocate has exhausted the possibilities for further review – once the United States Supreme Court has
denied a petition for certiorari. But it’s not always over yet, even once the Supreme Court has denied a petition for certiorari.
Reading further, they would have realized it was about petitions for rehearing.

They would have to skip this part:
To close, a note of caution: The petition for rehearing after denial of certiorari should not be a routine part of your practice.
It is part of Klayman's routine practice.

While, in theory, I suppose it could be possible SCOTUS could re-open, Raland did not give a specific case where this actually happened, so, I will assume he is just making things up (not my job to "do my own research" to figure out if his claim holds water). It would be easier to go the Rule 60 route, but the result would be the exact same.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#587

Post by bob »

northland10 wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 7:58 pm While, in theory, I suppose it could be possible SCOTUS could re-open, Raland did not give a specific case where this actually happened, so, I will assume he is just making things up (not my job to "do my own research" to figure out if his claim holds water).
Yeah; that's not a thing.

I mean, sure, yeah, the conservative six could call an impromptu conference, vote to amend the rules, vote to reopen Wong Kim Ark, vote to vacate the original ruling, and vote in a new ruling. Sure; yeah; in theory. That never has happened, and it would upend much of how the world expects courts to work.

* * *

Facebook comments:
Donna Patrick wrote:You ran a good Grift. Maybe the Cult will send you more $$$ if you cry Rigged. 😆 🤣 😂
Raland Brunson wrote:The donations we received helped me pay off some of the expenses that were incurred during this legal battle, as well as property damages that came about by people such as yourselves.
I did not see any other comment by any of the Brunsons.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
Sam the Centipede
Posts: 2156
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:19 pm

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#588

Post by Sam the Centipede »

bob wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 10:57 pm That never has happened, and it would upend much of how the world expects courts to work.
I like your optimism bob! This Supreme Court? Don't give them ideas!
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#589

Post by pipistrelle »

Are they claiming they were vandalized?
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#590

Post by bob »

pipistrelle wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 7:38 am Are they claiming they were vandalized?
Not expressly!

It was vaguely worded, which the Brunsons often do when churning their grift.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#591

Post by bob »


"Roy Munson"? :eek:


► Show Spoiler
Image ImageImage
User avatar
pipistrelle
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:27 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#592

Post by pipistrelle »

bob wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 1:30 am
► Show Spoiler
You know when two accounts are mostly numbers they are Real People.
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#593

Post by bob »

pipistrelle wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 8:06 am You know when two accounts are mostly numbers they are Real People.
I considered whether that account was fake. But there many photos of the same guy in the feed.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#594

Post by bob »

So despite Raland's (mostly) acknowledging it is over, and Loy's moving on to new giftts, this zombie won't die; e.g.:

Nb.: The conspiracy has expanded to now include a sekrit ruling (from a sekrit location :roll: ).
Image ImageImage
User avatar
northland10
Posts: 6310
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:47 pm
Location: Northeast Illinois
Occupation: Organist/Choir Director/Fundraising Data Analyst
Verified: ✅ I'm me.

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#595

Post by northland10 »

Troll account.
101010 :towel:
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#596

Post by realist »

Went to his page. :shock: :crazy:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
Luke
Posts: 6051
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:21 pm
Location: @orly_licious With Pete Buttigieg and the other "open and defiant homosexuals" --Bryan Fischer AFA

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#597

Post by Luke »

Couldn't help it, I'm overtired :lol: I replied to Andromeda11711:

Luke Johnson 🇺🇸 @Orly_licious Now
That's great news! My uncle is having a big birthday and loves President Trump. Could you please get some autographed presidential swag for him? It would mean the world to him.

Lt Root Beer of the Mighty 699th. Fogbow 💙s titular Mama June in Fogbow's Favourite Show™ Mama June: From Not To Hot! Fogbow's Theme Song™ Edith Massey's "I Got The Evidence!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5jDHZd0JAg
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#598

Post by realist »

:rotflmao:
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
User avatar
bob
Posts: 6386
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:07 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#599

Post by bob »


SCOG (Supreme Court of Grok) has spoken. :smoking:

It is hi-larious the dO-YOuR-oWN-reSEArch!!!1! "researches" by just GIGO'ing chatbots.
Image ImageImage
User avatar
realist
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:25 am

#Brunson v. Adams - MAGAts Version of Birthers Hopium / ReVote2017 SCOTUS Case

#600

Post by realist »

Brooke is quite a piece of work.
Image
Image X 4
Image X 32
Post Reply

Return to “The Big Lie & Aftermath of The Former Guy”