bob wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2024 5:46 pm
Ben-Prime wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2024 5:36 pm
But what if they appeal to the Intergalactic Space Court?
:
Raland wrote:2nd Petition for a Hearing DENIED.
I'm only allowed two petitions, so my case against the 3 Justices is now in the hands of their possible future considerations (all cases in the U.S. Supreme Court that have been denied can be recalled by the Justices at any time).
It's been a four and a half year battle and we want to thank all of you for your amazing and diligent support during that time.
God bless all of you.
Maybe Brunson read the first and maybe paragraph or so of this article.
https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/view ... ular_media
It ain’t over till it’s over.
Truer words were never spoken, and yet the question remains: When, exactly, is it over? Perhaps the safest answer, when it comes to
litigation, is “never.” Even a years-old judgment could, in unusual circumstances, be reopened.1 Nonetheless, it is usually safe to say that a case
has run its course – that the advocate has exhausted the possibilities for further review – once the United States Supreme Court has
denied a petition for certiorari. But it’s not always over yet, even once the Supreme Court has denied a petition for certiorari.
Reading further, they would have realized it was about petitions for rehearing.
They would have to skip this part:
To close, a note of caution: The petition for rehearing after denial of certiorari should not be a routine part of your practice.
It is part of Klayman's routine practice.
While, in theory, I suppose it could be possible SCOTUS could re-open, Raland did not give a specific case where this actually happened, so, I will assume he is just making things up (not my job to "do my own research" to figure out if his claim holds water). It would be easier to go the Rule 60 route, but the result would be the exact same.